LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
  1. Home
  2. Compare
  3. Models
  4. Glm 5.1 vs Glm 5.2
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 67

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for GLM-5.1 and GLM-5.2, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

GLM-5.1

GLM-5.1 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 5 to 1.

Evidence depth

67 data points

Includes 0 benchmark rows, 1 audit samples, and 8 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with GLM-5.1

The charts below split 9 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Change comparison

Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.

Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.

Model compare

GLM-5.1 vs GLM-5.2

glm-5-1-vs-glm-5-2

Model A

ChatGLM

GLM-5.1

Model B

ChatGLM

GLM-5.2

Overall leaderLeadingContender
Verified metric wins5 wins1 wins
Where it leadsCheapest input price, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent testsAverage speed
Model metadataNo OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model.GLM-5.2 exposes 1.0M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs.
DeveloperZhipu AIZhipu AI
Context windowNo data1.0M tokens
Max outputNo data262.1K tokens
ReleasedNo dataJun 2026
ModalitiesNo data

Input

Text

Output

Text
FeaturesNone listed
Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerNo dataOther
Knowledge cutoffNo dataNo data
OpenRouter IDNo dataz-ai/glm-5.2
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Category performance

Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.

Model A coverage
7 / 8
Model B coverage
0 / 8
Shared
0 shared categories
GLM-5.1GLM-5.2
Category performanceCompare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.AgentsCodingReasoningKnowledgeMathMultilingualMultimodalInstruction following

Avg. score

GLM-5.1

67

Avg. score

GLM-5.2

-

Selected category

Agents

GLM-5.1

Professional benchmark details

Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.

No shared professional benchmark scores are available yet.

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
ChatGLMGLM-5.1
ChatGLMGLM-5.2
VSLLMWinner: GLM-5.1
ChatGLM

GLM-5.1

glm-5.1-free

Audit score

81

View report
727280100
ChatGLM

GLM-5.2

glm-5.2

Audit score

79

View report
698463100

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
ChatGLMGLM-5.1
ChatGLMGLM-5.2
OpenRouter15 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-5.1

speed / latency

58 tok/s / 14051ms

input / output

No data

ChatGLM

GLM-5.2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

天云港模型开放平台15 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-5.1

speed / latency

40 tok/s / 17425ms

input / output

No data

ChatGLM

GLM-5.2

speed / latency

47 tok/s / 15698ms

input / output

No data

SiliconFlow10 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-5.1

speed / latency

50 tok/s / 9040ms

input / output

No data

ChatGLM

GLM-5.2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Tokeness10 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-5.1

speed / latency

74 tok/s / 6761ms

input / output

No data

ChatGLM

GLM-5.2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

ChooseC API5 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-5.1

speed / latency

57 tok/s / 1182ms

input / output

No data

ChatGLM

GLM-5.2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

小水管 API
ChatGLM

GLM-5.1

glm-5.1-chat

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

ChatGLM

GLM-5.2

glm-5.2

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

VSLLM
ChatGLM

GLM-5.1

glm-5.1

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.036/M / $0.036/M

ChatGLM

GLM-5.2

glm-5.2

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.036/M / $0.036/M

Moyanjdc API
ChatGLM

GLM-5.1

glm-5.1

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.058/M

ChatGLM

GLM-5.2

glm-5.2

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.027/M / $0.027/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-5.1 and GLM-5.2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
ChatGLMGLM-5.1
ChatGLMGLM-5.2
When to choose each model

GLM-5.1

GLM-5.1 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests.

GLM-5.2

GLM-5.2 is stronger when you prioritize Average speed.

FAQ

TL;DR: GLM-5.1 leads across 67 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from GLM-5.1 vs GLM-5.2 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

ChatGLMGLM-5.1 vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-5.16 verified data pointsChatGLMGLM-5.1 vs GPT-56 verified data pointsGeminiGemini 2.5 Pro vs GLM-5.16 verified data points

Data as of Jun 18, 2026, 10:26 AM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.