Data points: 142
Model compare
The readout for GLM-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: GLM-5.1. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
GLM-5.1
GLM-5.1 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 68 to 32.
Evidence depth
142 data points
Includes 33 benchmark rows, 2 audit samples, and 10 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GLM-5.1
The charts below split 45 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | GLM-5.1 | MiniMax M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 68.0 pts | 32.0 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 4 categories | 1 categories |
| Operational advantages | Provider coverage | Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers |
| Context window | 204.8K tokens | 204.8K tokens |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 131.1K tokens |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | Input Text |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | GLM-5.1 | MiniMax M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Z.ai | MiniMax |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Mar 2026 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Other | Other |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | z-ai/glm-5.1 | minimax/minimax-m2.7 |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-5.1 and MiniMax M2.7: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
GLM-5.1
GLM-5.1 is stronger in benchmark categories (Agents, Coding, Knowledge, Instruction following) and operational dimensions (Provider coverage).
MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax M2.7 is stronger in benchmark categories (Reasoning) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers).
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
GLM-5.1
54.4
Avg. score
MiniMax M2.7
51
GLM-5.1 leads by 8.9
GLM-5.1 leads by 7.5
MiniMax M2.7 leads by 0.5
GLM-5.1 leads by 3.8
GLM-5.1
No data
No data
GLM-5.1 leads by 0.3
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
GLM-5.1
winner63.0
Rank #28/90 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
51.0
Rank #62/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GLM-5.1
$2.13/M
Rank #107/169 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.7
winner$0.525/M
Rank #42/169 · confidence 4
GLM-5.1
$4.40/M
Rank #101/169 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.7
winner$1.20/M
Rank #44/169 · confidence 4
GLM-5.1
$1.38/M
Rank #120/169 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.7
winner$0.300/M
Rank #47/169 · confidence 4
GLM-5.1
62.3
Rank #59/94 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
winner68.7
Rank #29/94 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GLM-5.1
86.8%
Rank #39/194 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.7
winner87.4%
Rank #35/194 · confidence 4
GLM-5.1
28.0%
Rank #40/193 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.7
winner28.1%
Rank #39/193 · confidence 4
GLM-5.1
winner4.6
Rank #41/77 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
0.6
Rank #69/77 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GLM-5.1
winner62.7
Rank #3/11 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
51.9
Rank #11/11 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GLM-5.1
winner42.7
Rank #5/10 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
39.8
Rank #8/10 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GLM-5.1
winner62.7
Rank #13/71 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
41.4
Rank #59/71 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GLM-5.1
winner31.5
Rank #14/33 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
27.0
Rank #15/33 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GLM-5.1
winner58.4
Rank #17/42 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
56.2
Rank #26/42 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GLM-5.1
43.8%
Rank #43/191 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.7
winner47.0%
Rank #28/191 · confidence 4
GLM-5.1
winner55.8
Rank #30/64 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
52.6
Rank #33/64 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GLM-5.1
43.8
Rank #46/101 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
winner47.0
Rank #34/101 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GLM-5.1
86.2
Rank #23/25 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
winner87.0
Rank #22/25 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GLM-5.1
winner1.9
Rank #32/34 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
0.7
Rank #34/34 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GLM-5.1
winner40.2
Rank #32/104 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
38.1
Rank #41/104 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GLM-5.1
86.8
Rank #42/101 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
winner87.4
Rank #38/101 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GLM-5.1
28.0
Rank #39/101 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
winner28.1
Rank #38/101 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GLM-5.1
24.2
Rank #67/95 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
winner26.1
Rank #58/95 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GLM-5.1
29.4
Rank #88/95 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
winner34.4
Rank #83/95 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GLM-5.1
winner1299.0
Rank #16/69 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
1271.0
Rank #28/69 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GLM-5.1
winner76.3
Rank #13/86 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
75.7
Rank #18/86 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GLM-5.1
winner97.7
Rank #9/84 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
84.8
Rank #47/84 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GLM-5.1
winner62.3
Rank #10/28 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
48.7
Rank #26/28 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GLM-5.1
winner60.1
Rank #12/50 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
40.4
Rank #36/50 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GLM-5.1
winner37.8
Rank #21/55 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
32.9
Rank #30/55 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GLM-5.1
winner1256.0
Rank #21/60 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
1159.0
Rank #30/60 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GLM-5.1
winner29.9
Rank #26/60 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
25.6
Rank #34/60 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GLM-5.1
winner63.5
Rank #27/50 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
57.0
Rank #34/50 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GLM-5.1
winner48.9
Rank #40/59 · confidence 2 · eval date 2026-04-07
MiniMax M2.7
45.1
Rank #44/59 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GLM-5.1 | MiniMax M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
Winner: GLM-5.1 | GLM-5.1 glm-5.1 Audit score 97 10010086100 | MiniMax M2.7 MiniMax-M2.7 No audit yet |
Winner: GLM-5.1 | GLM-5.1 z-ai/glm-5.1 Audit score 78 70728088 | MiniMax M2.7 minimaxai/minimax-m2.7 No audit yet |
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GLM-5.1 | MiniMax M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
115 tests | GLM-5.1 speed / latency 148 tok/s / 5296ms input / output No data | MiniMax M2.7 speed / latency 430 tok/s / 2481ms input / output No data |
55 tests | GLM-5.1 speed / latency 82 tok/s / 9309ms input / output No data | MiniMax M2.7 speed / latency 31 tok/s / 16785ms input / output No data |
25 tests | GLM-5.1 speed / latency 62 tok/s / 25980ms input / output No data | MiniMax M2.7 speed / latency 33 tok/s / 12037ms input / output No data |
15 tests | GLM-5.1 speed / latency 58 tok/s / 14051ms input / output No data | MiniMax M2.7 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
15 tests | GLM-5.1 speed / latency 74 tok/s / 6761ms input / output No data | MiniMax M2.7 speed / latency 147 tok/s / 22518ms input / output No data |
GLM-5.1 glm-5.1 speed / latency No data input / output $0/M/$0/M | MiniMax M2.7 minimax-m2.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0/M | |
GLM-5.1 glm-5.1 speed / latency No data input / output $0/M/$0/M | MiniMax M2.7 minimax-m2.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0/M | |
GLM-5.1 glm-5.1 speed / latency No data input / output $0/M/$0/M | MiniMax M2.7 minimax-m2.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.021/M | |
GLM-5.1 daipai/glm-5.1 speed / latency No data input / output $0.0020/request | MiniMax M2.7 daipai/minimax-m2.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0.0010/request | |
GLM-5.1 GLM-5.1-免费 speed / latency No data input / output $0.0030/request | MiniMax M2.7 MiniMax-M2.7-免费 speed / latency No data input / output $0.0030/request |
Weighted outcome: GLM-5.1. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Output
| Features | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
|---|
