Data points: 93
Model compare
The readout for GLM-5.1 and Mistral Large 3, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: GLM-5.1. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
GLM-5.1
GLM-5.1 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 95 to 5.
Evidence depth
93 data points
Includes 29 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 5 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GLM-5.1
The charts below split 34 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-5.1 and Mistral Large 3: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | GLM-5.1 | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 95.0 pts | 5.0 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 6 categories | 0 categories |
| Operational advantages | Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage | First-token latency |
| Context window | 202.8K tokens | No data |
| Max output | 128K tokens | No data |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | No data |
| Features |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | GLM-5.1 | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Z.ai | No data |
| Released | Apr 2026 | No data |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Other | No data |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | z-ai/glm-5.1 | No data |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-5.1 and Mistral Large 3: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
GLM-5.1
GLM-5.1 is stronger in benchmark categories (Agents, Coding, Reasoning, Knowledge, Math) and operational dimensions (Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage).
Mistral Large 3
Mistral Large 3 has these operational advantages: First-token latency.
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
GLM-5.1
55.1
Avg. score
Mistral Large 3
45.9
GLM-5.1 leads by 14.0
GLM-5.1 leads by 10.0
GLM-5.1 leads by 9.0
GLM-5.1 leads by 15.9
GLM-5.1 leads by 8.6
Mistral Large 3
Mistral Large 3
GLM-5.1 leads by 13.2
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
GLM-5.1
winner67.0
Rank #39/127 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-07
Mistral Large 3
47.0
Rank #75/127 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-12-02
GLM-5.1
58.62 s
Rank #125/139 · confidence 4
Mistral Large 3
winner0.65 s
Rank #21/139 · confidence 4
GLM-5.1
0.93 s
Rank #48/139 · confidence 4
Mistral Large 3
winner0.65 s
Rank #29/139 · confidence 4
GLM-5.1
winner65.7 tok/s
Rank #88/139 · confidence 4
Mistral Large 3
58.2 tok/s
Rank #101/139 · confidence 4
GLM-5.1
$4.40/M
Rank #99/163 · confidence 4
Mistral Large 3
winner$1.50/M
Rank #54/163 · confidence 4
GLM-5.1
$2.15/M
Rank #105/163 · confidence 4
Mistral Large 3
winner$0.750/M
Rank #60/163 · confidence 4
GLM-5.1
$1.40/M
Rank #118/163 · confidence 4
Mistral Large 3
winner$0.500/M
Rank #70/163 · confidence 4
GLM-5.1
winner56.2
Rank #30/70 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-07
Mistral Large 3
49.0
Rank #42/70 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-12-02
GLM-5.1
winner86.8%
Rank #34/187 · confidence 4
Mistral Large 3
68.0%
Rank #118/187 · confidence 4
GLM-5.1
winner28.0%
Rank #34/186 · confidence 4
Mistral Large 3
4.1%
Rank #156/186 · confidence 4
GLM-5.1
winner62.3
Rank #55/89 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-07
Mistral Large 3
34.7
Rank #77/89 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-12-02
GLM-5.1
winner43.2
Rank #24/85 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-07
Mistral Large 3
15.9
Rank #68/85 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-12-02
GLM-5.1
winner55.8
Rank #26/58 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-07
Mistral Large 3
20.1
Rank #53/58 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-12-02
GLM-5.1
winner73.5
Rank #29/100 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-07
Mistral Large 3
33.7
Rank #82/100 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-12-02
GLM-5.1
winner43.8%
Rank #38/184 · confidence 4
Mistral Large 3
36.2%
Rank #101/184 · confidence 4
GLM-5.1
winner43.8
Rank #42/96 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-07
Mistral Large 3
36.2
Rank #73/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-12-02
GLM-5.1
winner83.7
Rank #12/92 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-07
Mistral Large 3
44.3
Rank #70/92 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-12-02
GLM-5.1
winner40.2
Rank #27/99 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-07
Mistral Large 3
15.9
Rank #81/99 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-12-02
GLM-5.1
29.4
Rank #83/90 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-07
Mistral Large 3
winner83.7
Rank #31/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-12-02
GLM-5.1
winner28.0
Rank #35/96 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-07
Mistral Large 3
4.1
Rank #87/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-12-02
GLM-5.1
winner86.8
Rank #38/96 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-07
Mistral Large 3
68.0
Rank #78/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-12-02
GLM-5.1
winner24.2
Rank #62/90 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-07
Mistral Large 3
24.1
Rank #65/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-12-02
GLM-5.1
winner85.9
Rank #12/75 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-07
Mistral Large 3
59.9
Rank #52/75 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-12-02
GLM-5.1
winner76.3
Rank #13/86 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-07
Mistral Large 3
36.2
Rank #79/86 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-12-02
GLM-5.1
winner97.7
Rank #7/84 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-07
Mistral Large 3
24.6
Rank #76/84 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-12-02
GLM-5.1
winner37.8
Rank #17/50 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-07
Mistral Large 3
6.6
Rank #46/50 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-12-02
GLM-5.1
winner1257.0
Rank #17/54 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-07
Mistral Large 3
633.0
Rank #46/54 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-12-02
GLM-5.1
winner29.9
Rank #21/54 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-07
Mistral Large 3
5.5
Rank #46/54 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-12-02
GLM-5.1
winner60.2
Rank #39/95 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-04-07
Mistral Large 3
38.7
Rank #68/95 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-12-02
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GLM-5.1 | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GLM-5.1 | Mistral Large 3 |
|---|---|---|
15 tests | GLM-5.1 speed / latency 62 tok/s / 25980ms input / output No data | Mistral Large 3 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
5 tests | GLM-5.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Mistral Large 3 speed / latency 29 tok/s / 3003ms input / output No data |
0 tests | GLM-5.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Mistral Large 3 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | GLM-5.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Mistral Large 3 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | GLM-5.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Mistral Large 3 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Weighted outcome: GLM-5.1. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
| None listed |
