Data points: 72
Model compare
The readout for GLM-5.1 and Phi 4 Multimodal Instruct, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: GLM-5.1. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
GLM-5.1
GLM-5.1 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 88 to 12.
Evidence depth
72 data points
Includes 3 benchmark rows, 2 audit samples, and 8 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GLM-5.1
The charts below split 13 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-5.1 and Phi 4 Multimodal Instruct: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | GLM-5.1 | Phi 4 Multimodal Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 88.0 pts | 12.0 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 3 categories | 0 categories |
| Operational advantages | Cheapest input price, Provider coverage | Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers |
| Context window | 204.8K tokens | No data |
| Max output | 128K tokens | No data |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | No data |
| Features |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | GLM-5.1 | Phi 4 Multimodal Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Z.ai | No data |
| Released | Apr 2026 | No data |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Other | No data |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | z-ai/glm-5.1 | No data |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-5.1 and Phi 4 Multimodal Instruct: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
GLM-5.1
GLM-5.1 is stronger in benchmark categories (Coding, Reasoning, Math) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, Provider coverage).
Phi 4 Multimodal Instruct
Phi 4 Multimodal Instruct has these operational advantages: Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers.
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
GLM-5.1
54.4
Avg. score
Phi 4 Multimodal Instruct
35.9
GLM-5.1
GLM-5.1 leads by 26.4
GLM-5.1 leads by 19.1
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
GLM-5.1
winner86.8%
Rank #35/188 · confidence 4
Phi 4 Multimodal Instruct
31.5%
Rank #186/188 · confidence 4
GLM-5.1
winner28.0%
Rank #35/187 · confidence 4
Phi 4 Multimodal Instruct
4.4%
Rank #147/187 · confidence 4
GLM-5.1
winner43.8%
Rank #39/185 · confidence 4
Phi 4 Multimodal Instruct
11.0%
Rank #183/185 · confidence 4
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GLM-5.1 | Phi 4 Multimodal Instruct |
|---|---|---|
Winner: GLM-5.1 | GLM-5.1 glm-5.1 Audit score 97 10010086100 | Phi 4 Multimodal Instruct microsoft/phi-4-multimodal-instruct No audit yet |
Winner: GLM-5.1 | GLM-5.1 z-ai/glm-5.1 Audit score 78 70728088 | Phi 4 Multimodal Instruct microsoft/phi-4-multimodal-instruct No audit yet |
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GLM-5.1 | Phi 4 Multimodal Instruct |
|---|---|---|
20 tests | GLM-5.1 speed / latency 82 tok/s / 9309ms input / output No data | Phi 4 Multimodal Instruct speed / latency 83 tok/s / 393ms input / output No data |
5 tests | GLM-5.1 speed / latency 148 tok/s / 5296ms input / output No data | Phi 4 Multimodal Instruct speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
5 tests | GLM-5.1 glm-5.1 speed / latency 57 tok/s / 1182ms input / output $6.00/M/$24.00/M | Phi 4 Multimodal Instruct microsoft/phi-4-multimodal-instruct speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0/M |
5 tests | GLM-5.1 speed / latency 66 tok/s / 4538ms input / output No data | Phi 4 Multimodal Instruct speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
5 tests | GLM-5.1 speed / latency 37 tok/s / 20151ms input / output No data | Phi 4 Multimodal Instruct speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
GLM-5.1 glm-5.1 speed / latency No data input / output $6.00/M/$24.00/M | Phi 4 Multimodal Instruct microsoft/phi-4-multimodal-instruct speed / latency No data input / output $0/M | |
GLM-5.1 glm-5.1-free speed / latency No data input / output $749250.00/M/$749250.00/M | Phi 4 Multimodal Instruct microsoft/phi-4-multimodal-instruct speed / latency No data input / output $0/M | |
GLM-5.1 glm-5.1 speed / latency No data input / output $0.010/request | Phi 4 Multimodal Instruct microsoft/phi-4-multimodal-instruct speed / latency No data input / output $0.010/request |
Weighted outcome: GLM-5.1. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
| None listed |
GLM-5.1
GLM-5.1 leads by 7.5
No data
No data
GLM-5.1
