LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 70

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for GLM-5 Turbo and GPT-5.4, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 2 to 4.

Evidence depth

70 data points

Includes 3 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 10 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with GPT-5.4

The charts below split 13 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

GLM-5 Turbo vs GPT-5.4

glm-5-turbo-vs-gpt-5-4

Model A

ChatGLM

GLM-5 Turbo

Model B

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

Overall leaderContenderLeading
Verified metric wins2 wins4 wins
Where it leadsCheapest input price, Average speedFirst-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests
Model metadataGLM-5 Turbo exposes 262.1K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, JSON mode.GPT-5.4 exposes 1.1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.
DeveloperZhipu AIOpenAI
Context window262.1K tokens1.1M tokens
Max output131.1K tokens128K tokens
ReleasedMar 2026Mar 2026
Modalities

Input

Text

Output

Text

Input

TextImageFile

Output

Text
Features
Text inputText outputTool callingJSON modeReasoning
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerOtherGPT
Knowledge cutoffNo dataNo data
OpenRouter IDz-ai/glm-5-turboopenai/gpt-5.4
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
ChatGLMGLM-5 Turbo
OpenAIGPT-5.4
GPQA
84.7%#34
92.0%#3
SciCode
43.6%#27
56.6%#3
HLE
25.4%#28
41.6%#4

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
ChatGLMGLM-5 Turbo
OpenAIGPT-5.4
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
ChatGLMGLM-5 Turbo
OpenAIGPT-5.4
Mars HK125 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-5 Turbo

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

49 tok/s / 6084ms

input / output

No data

Mars HK100 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-5 Turbo

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

57 tok/s / 3556ms

input / output

No data

星见雅 API20 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-5 Turbo

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

49 tok/s / 5435ms

input / output

No data

6i2 API5 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-5 Turbo

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

428 tok/s / 4171ms

input / output

No data

Chlink API5 tests
ChatGLM

GLM-5 Turbo

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

50 tok/s / 5476ms

input / output

No data

VSLLM
ChatGLM

GLM-5 Turbo

glm-5-turbo

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0073/M / $0.0073/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

gpt-5.4-openai-compact

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.365/M / $0.365/M

Zero API
ChatGLM

GLM-5 Turbo

glm-5-turbo

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.082/M / $0.274/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

gpt-5.4

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.171/M / $1.03/M

17NAS API
ChatGLM

GLM-5 Turbo

glm-5-turbo

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.274/M / $1.21/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

gpt-5.4

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.132/M / $0.789/M

WONG公益站
ChatGLM

GLM-5 Turbo

GLM-5-Turbo

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.274/M / $1.10/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

gpt-5.4-openai-compact

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$10.27/M / $61.64/M

Compute Token
ChatGLM

GLM-5 Turbo

glm-5-turbo

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.288/M / $0.959/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

gpt-5.4

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.599/M / $3.60/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-5 Turbo and GPT-5.4: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
ChatGLMGLM-5 Turbo
OpenAIGPT-5.4
When to choose each model

GLM-5 Turbo

GLM-5 Turbo is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed.

GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4 is stronger when you prioritize First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests.

FAQ

TL;DR: GPT-5.4 leads across 70 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from GLM-5 Turbo vs GPT-5.4 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GLM-5 Turbo6 verified data pointsChatGLMGLM-5 Turbo vs GPT-56 verified data pointsChatGLMGLM-5 Turbo vs GPT-5.26 verified data pointsGeminiGemini 2.5 Pro vs GLM-5 Turbo6 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 04:37 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.