Data points: 93
Model compare
The readout for GLM-5V Turbo and GPT-5, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: GPT-5. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
GPT-5
GPT-5 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 32 to 68.
Evidence depth
93 data points
Includes 15 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 8 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GPT-5
The charts below split 23 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-5V Turbo and GPT-5: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | GLM-5V Turbo | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Contender | Leading |
| Weighted overall score | 32.0 pts | 68.0 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 2 categories | 3 categories |
| Operational advantages | No data | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage |
| Context window | 202.8K tokens | 400K tokens |
| Max output | 131.1K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Modalities | Input ImageTextvideo Output Text |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | GLM-5V Turbo | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Z.ai | OpenAI |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Aug 2025 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Other | GPT |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | 2024-09-30 |
| OpenRouter ID | z-ai/glm-5v-turbo | openai/gpt-5 |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-5V Turbo and GPT-5: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
GLM-5V Turbo
GLM-5V Turbo leads these benchmark categories: Agents, Coding.
GPT-5
GPT-5 is stronger in benchmark categories (Reasoning, Knowledge, Instruction following) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage).
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
GLM-5V Turbo
50.3
Avg. score
GPT-5
51.9
GLM-5V Turbo leads by 1.6
GLM-5V Turbo leads by 6.5
GPT-5 leads by 0.9
GPT-5 leads by 2.3
GPT-5
No data
No data
GPT-5 leads by 3.2
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
GLM-5V Turbo
61.0
Rank #56/89 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-01
GPT-5
winner75.6
Rank #2/89 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-08-07
GLM-5V Turbo
0.6
Rank #65/73 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-01
GPT-5
winner5.7
Rank #30/73 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-08-07
GLM-5V Turbo
winner15.8%
Rank #69/187 · confidence 4
GPT-5
5.4%
Rank #132/187 · confidence 4
GLM-5V Turbo
winner80.9%
Rank #74/188 · confidence 4
GPT-5
67.3%
Rank #121/188 · confidence 4
GLM-5V Turbo
winner43.5%
Rank #41/185 · confidence 4
GPT-5
38.8%
Rank #83/185 · confidence 4
GLM-5V Turbo
winner43.5
Rank #44/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-01
GPT-5
42.9
Rank #46/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-08-07
GLM-5V Turbo
29.1
Rank #45/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-01
GPT-5
winner40.7
Rank #20/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-08-07
GLM-5V Turbo
67.9
Rank #55/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-01
GPT-5
winner82.1
Rank #31/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-08-07
GLM-5V Turbo
15.8
Rank #59/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-01
GPT-5
winner26.5
Rank #39/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-08-07
GLM-5V Turbo
80.9
Rank #61/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-01
GPT-5
winner85.4
Rank #45/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-08-07
GLM-5V Turbo
34.5
Rank #50/99 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-01
GPT-5
winner34.7
Rank #48/99 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-08-07
GLM-5V Turbo
winner1255.0
Rank #29/66 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-01
GPT-5
1209.0
Rank #40/66 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-08-07
GLM-5V Turbo
72.8
Rank #34/57 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-01
GPT-5
winner74.2
Rank #32/57 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-08-07
GLM-5V Turbo
61.1
Rank #52/86 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-01
GPT-5
winner73.1
Rank #29/86 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-08-07
GLM-5V Turbo
winner98.5
Rank #2/84 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-01
GPT-5
84.8
Rank #44/84 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-08-07
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GLM-5V Turbo | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GLM-5V Turbo | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
20 tests | GLM-5V Turbo speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5 speed / latency 95 tok/s / 1234ms input / output No data |
0 tests | GLM-5V Turbo speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | GLM-5V Turbo speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | GLM-5V Turbo speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | GLM-5V Turbo speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
GLM-5V Turbo glm-5v-turbo speed / latency No data input / output $0.082/M/$0.274/M | GPT-5 gpt-5 speed / latency No data input / output $0.086/M | |
GLM-5V Turbo glm-5v-turbo speed / latency No data input / output $0.274/M/$3.29/M | GPT-5 gpt-5 speed / latency No data input / output $0.411/M | |
GLM-5V Turbo glm-5v-turbo speed / latency No data input / output $0.754/M/$3.32/M | GPT-5 gpt-5 speed / latency No data input / output $1.34/M |
Weighted outcome: GPT-5. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Input
Output
| Features | Text inputImage inputText outputTool callingJSON modeReasoning | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
|---|
