LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 81

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for GPT-4.1 Nano and GPT-5.4, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

Tie

Tie currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 3 to 3.

Evidence depth

81 data points

Includes 8 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 9 provider examples.

Selection signal

Tie

The charts below split 17 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-5.4

gpt-4-1-nano-vs-gpt-5-4

Model A

OpenAI

GPT-4.1 Nano

Model B

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

Overall leaderTieTie
Verified metric wins3 wins3 wins
Where it leadsCheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latencyFree providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests
Model metadataGPT-4.1 Nano exposes 1.0M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.GPT-5.4 exposes 1.1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.
DeveloperOpenAIOpenAI
Context window1.0M tokens1.1M tokens
Max output32.8K tokens128K tokens
ReleasedApr 2025Mar 2026
Modalities

Input

ImageTextFile

Output

Text

Input

TextImageFile

Output

Text
Features
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerGPTGPT
Knowledge cutoff2024-06-30No data
OpenRouter IDopenai/gpt-4.1-nanoopenai/gpt-5.4
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
OpenAIGPT-4.1 Nano
OpenAIGPT-5.4
GPQA
51.2%#119
92.0%#3
SciCode
25.9%#99
56.6%#3
HLE
3.9%#96
41.6%#4
Time to first answer token
0.47 s#5
134.24 s#111
Input price
$0.100/M#6
$2.50/M#37
Output price
$0.400/M#6
$15.00/M#44
Time to first token
0.47 s#7
134.24 s#110
Blended price
$0.175/M#10
$5.63/M#63

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
OpenAIGPT-4.1 Nano
OpenAIGPT-5.4
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
OpenAIGPT-4.1 Nano
OpenAIGPT-5.4
SWT-API75 tests
OpenAI

GPT-4.1 Nano

speed / latency

127 tok/s / 2007ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

V-API25 tests
OpenAI

GPT-4.1 Nano

speed / latency

162 tok/s / 1284ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Sub2API20 tests
OpenAI

GPT-4.1 Nano

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

51 tok/s / 4032ms

input / output

No data

Fengsili API10 tests
OpenAI

GPT-4.1 Nano

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

88 tok/s / 6075ms

input / output

No data

QQ Code10 tests
OpenAI

GPT-4.1 Nano

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

55 tok/s / 2903ms

input / output

No data

ZEN-AI VIP
OpenAI

GPT-4.1 Nano

gpt-4.1-nano-2025-04-14

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0041/M / $0.016/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

gpt-5.4-xhigh

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.103/M / $0.616/M

Zero API
OpenAI

GPT-4.1 Nano

gpt-4.1-nano

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0068/M / $0.027/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

gpt-5.4

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.171/M / $1.03/M

ModelPool
OpenAI

GPT-4.1 Nano

gpt-4.1-nano

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0086/M / $0.034/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

gpt-5.4

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.429/M / $3.43/M

KKSJ-AI
OpenAI

GPT-4.1 Nano

gpt-4.1-nano

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.012/M / $0.049/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

gpt-5.4

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$9.25/M / $55.48/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for GPT-4.1 Nano and GPT-5.4: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
OpenAIGPT-4.1 Nano
OpenAIGPT-5.4
When to choose each model

GPT-4.1 Nano

GPT-4.1 Nano is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency.

GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4 is stronger when you prioritize Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests.

FAQ

TL;DR: Tie leads across 81 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from GPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-5.4 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-4.1 Nano6 verified data pointsOpenAIGPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-56 verified data pointsOpenAIGPT-4.1 Nano vs GPT-5.26 verified data pointsGeminiGemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-4.1 Nano6 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 04:40 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.