Data points: 55
Model compare
The readout for GPT-4o Mini and GPT-4o Mini Audio, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: GPT-4o Mini. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 83.3 to 16.7.
Evidence depth
55 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 6 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GPT-4o Mini
The charts below split 6 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GPT-4o Mini and GPT-4o Mini Audio: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | GPT-4o Mini | GPT-4o Mini Audio |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 83.3 pts | 16.7 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 0 categories | 0 categories |
| Operational advantages | Free providers, Provider coverage | No data |
| Context window | 128K tokens | No data |
| Max output | 16.4K tokens | No data |
| Modalities | Input TextImageFile Output Text | No data |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | GPT-4o Mini | GPT-4o Mini Audio |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | OpenAI |
| Released | Jul 2024 | No data |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | GPT | No data |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2023-10-31 | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | openai/gpt-4o-mini | No data |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GPT-4o Mini and GPT-4o Mini Audio: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini has these operational advantages: Free providers, Provider coverage.
GPT-4o Mini Audio
GPT-4o Mini Audio does not clearly lead in the benchmark or operational dimensions shared by both models.
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
GPT-4o Mini
42.8
Avg. score
GPT-4o Mini Audio
-
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini
GPT-4o Mini
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
No shared professional benchmark scores are available yet.
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GPT-4o Mini | GPT-4o Mini Audio |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GPT-4o Mini | GPT-4o Mini Audio |
|---|---|---|
2 tests | GPT-4o Mini speed / latency 83 tok/s / 1341ms input / output No data | GPT-4o Mini Audio speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | GPT-4o Mini speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-4o Mini Audio speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | GPT-4o Mini speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-4o Mini Audio speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | GPT-4o Mini speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-4o Mini Audio speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | GPT-4o Mini speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-4o Mini Audio speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
GPT-4o Mini gpt-4o-mini speed / latency No data input / output $0/request | GPT-4o Mini Audio gpt-4o-mini-audio-preview-2024-12-17 speed / latency No data input / output $0/request |
Weighted outcome: GPT-4o Mini. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeWeb search | None listed |
|---|
