LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 78

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for GPT-5.1 Codex and GPT-5.2, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

GPT-5.2

GPT-5.2 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 0 to 3.

Evidence depth

78 data points

Includes 8 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 9 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with GPT-5.2

The charts below split 17 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

GPT-5.1 Codex vs GPT-5.2

gpt-5-1-codex-vs-gpt-5-2

Model A

OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Codex

Model B

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

Overall leaderContenderLeading
Verified metric wins0 wins3 wins
Where it leadsNo dataCheapest input price, Provider coverage, Recent tests

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
OpenAIGPT-5.1 Codex
OpenAIGPT-5.2
LiveCodeBench
84.9%#10

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
OpenAIGPT-5.1 Codex
OpenAIGPT-5.2
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
OpenAIGPT-5.1 Codex
OpenAIGPT-5.2
15 tests
OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Codex

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for GPT-5.1 Codex and GPT-5.2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
OpenAIGPT-5.1 Codex
OpenAIGPT-5.2
When to choose each model

GPT-5.1 Codex

GPT-5.1 Codex does not clearly lead on the verified metrics here, so check provider-specific pricing before choosing.

GPT-5.2

GPT-5.2 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Provider coverage, Recent tests.

FAQ

TL;DR: GPT-5.2 leads across 78 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 4 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from GPT-5.1 Codex vs GPT-5.2 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

Model metadataGPT-5.1 Codex exposes 400K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, Text output, Tool calling.GPT-5.2 exposes 128K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.
DeveloperOpenAIOpenAI
Context window400K tokens128K tokens
Max output128K tokens16.4K tokens
ReleasedNov 2025Dec 2025
Modalities

Input

TextImage

Output

Text

Input

FileImageText

Output

Text
Features
Text inputImage inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerGPTGPT
Knowledge cutoffNo dataNo data
OpenRouter IDopenai/gpt-5.1-codexopenai/gpt-5.2-chat
ReferencesNo dataNo data
88.9%
#4
MMLU-Pro
86.0%#13
87.4%#6
GPQA
86.0%#26
90.3%#9
HLE
23.4%#33
35.4%#9
SciCode
40.2%#46
52.1%#9
Output speed
185.7 tok/s#15
72.8 tok/s#71
Input price
$1.25/M#30
$1.75/M#35
Output price
$10.00/M#41
$14.00/M#43

speed / latency

56 tok/s / 1798ms

input / output

No data

星见雅 API15 tests
OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Codex

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

52 tok/s / 2671ms

input / output

No data

BUZZ5 tests
OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Codex

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

64 tok/s / 3553ms

input / output

No data

Feng Love API5 tests
OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Codex

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

65 tok/s / 4770ms

input / output

No data

Rnglg2 API5 tests
OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Codex

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

55 tok/s / 1434ms

input / output

No data

DNSHE
OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Codex

gpt-5.1-codex

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2-openai-compact

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$75.00/M / $600.00/M

ZenScale AI
OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Codex

gpt-5.1-codex

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.029/M / $0.235/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0068/M / $0.055/M

10dian-API
OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Codex

gpt-5.1-codex

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.010/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.010/M

KFCV50
OpenAI

GPT-5.1 Codex

gpt-5.1-codex-high

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.014/M / $0.014/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2-openai-compact

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$10.27/M / $10.27/M

N1N
OpenAIGPT-5.1 Codex vs GPT-5.44 verified data points
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.1 Codex4 verified data points
OpenAIGPT-5 vs GPT-5.1 Codex4 verified data points
GeminiGemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-5.1 Codex4 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 01:28 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.