Data points: 81
Model compare
The readout for GPT-5.2 and Kimi K2 Thinking, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: Kimi K2 Thinking. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
Kimi K2 Thinking
Kimi K2 Thinking has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 46.7 to 53.3.
Evidence depth
81 data points
Includes 8 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 6 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Kimi K2 Thinking
The charts below split 14 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GPT-5.2 and Kimi K2 Thinking: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | GPT-5.2 | Kimi K2 Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Contender | Leading |
| Weighted overall score | 46.7 pts | 53.3 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 1 categories | 2 categories |
| Operational advantages | Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage | No data |
| Context window | 400K tokens | 262.1K tokens |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 100.4K tokens |
| Modalities | Input FileImageText Output Text |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | GPT-5.2 | Kimi K2 Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | MoonshotAI |
| Released | Dec 2025 | Nov 2025 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | GPT | Other |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | openai/gpt-5.2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2-thinking |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GPT-5.2 and Kimi K2 Thinking: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 is stronger in benchmark categories (Math) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage).
Kimi K2 Thinking
Kimi K2 Thinking leads these benchmark categories: Coding, Reasoning.
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
GPT-5.2
52.9
Avg. score
Kimi K2 Thinking
55.7
GPT-5.2
Kimi K2 Thinking leads by 1.0
Kimi K2 Thinking leads by 1.2
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 leads by 2.3
No data
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
GPT-5.2
$14.00/M
Rank #133/162 · confidence 4
Kimi K2 Thinking
winner$2.50/M
Rank #75/162 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
$4.81/M
Rank #132/162 · confidence 4
Kimi K2 Thinking
winner$1.07/M
Rank #78/162 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
$1.75/M
Rank #120/162 · confidence 4
Kimi K2 Thinking
winner$0.600/M
Rank #80/162 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
81.4%
Rank #54/125 · confidence 4
Kimi K2 Thinking
winner84.8%
Rank #28/125 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
7.3%
Rank #109/187 · confidence 4
Kimi K2 Thinking
winner22.3%
Rank #49/187 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
71.2%
Rank #110/188 · confidence 4
Kimi K2 Thinking
winner83.8%
Rank #55/188 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
66.9%
Rank #36/115 · confidence 4
Kimi K2 Thinking
winner85.3%
Rank #8/115 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
40.4%
Rank #64/185 · confidence 4
Kimi K2 Thinking
winner42.4%
Rank #49/185 · confidence 4
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GPT-5.2 | Kimi K2 Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GPT-5.2 | Kimi K2 Thinking |
|---|---|---|
15 tests | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 52 tok/s / 2671ms input / output No data | Kimi K2 Thinking speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
10 tests | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 64 tok/s / 2953ms input / output No data | Kimi K2 Thinking speed / latency 45 tok/s / 7512ms input / output No data |
5 tests | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 55 tok/s / 1434ms input / output No data | Kimi K2 Thinking speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
5 tests | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 54 tok/s / 1449ms input / output No data | Kimi K2 Thinking speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
5 tests | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2 speed / latency 32 tok/s / 1965ms input / output $0.0041/request | Kimi K2 Thinking kimi-k2-thinking speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $1.64/M |
GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2 speed / latency No data input / output $0.0068/request | Kimi K2 Thinking kimi-k2-thinking-251104 speed / latency No data input / output $0.548/M |
Weighted outcome: Kimi K2 Thinking. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Input
Output
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
|---|
