Data points: 108
The readout for GPT-5.2 and Ling 2.6 Flash, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 4 to 0.
Evidence depth
108 data points
Includes 23 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 5 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GPT-5.2
The charts below split 28 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
Model compare GPT-5.2 vs Ling 2.6 Flashgpt-5-2-vs-ling-2-6-flash | Model A GPT-5.2 | Model B Ling 2.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Verified metric wins | 4 wins | 0 wins |
| Where it leads | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
GPT-5.2
61.8
Avg. score
Ling 2.6 Flash
39.7
Selected category
Coding
GPT-5.2 leads by 31.0
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
GPT-5.2
winner75.0
Rank #23/127 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Ling 2.6 Flash
37.0
Rank #91/127 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.2
winner0.72 s
Rank #23/139 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
0.74 s
Rank #25/139 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
69.1 tok/s
Rank #90/139 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner180.9 tok/s
Rank #27/139 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner0.72 s
Rank #31/139 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
0.74 s
Rank #34/139 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
$4.81/M
Rank #138/167 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner$0.150/M
Rank #7/167 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
$1.75/M
Rank #126/167 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner$0.100/M
Rank #7/167 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
$14.00/M
Rank #139/167 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner$0.300/M
Rank #8/167 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner72.7
Rank #12/88 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Ling 2.6 Flash
25.0
Rank #84/88 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.2
winner7.3%
Rank #107/186 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
6.2%
Rank #125/186 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner71.2%
Rank #110/187 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
59.3%
Rank #142/187 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner47.0
Rank #14/86 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Ling 2.6 Flash
21.2
Rank #66/86 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.2
winner52.1
Rank #16/95 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Ling 2.6 Flash
27.1
Rank #88/95 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.2
winner73.7
Rank #32/100 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Ling 2.6 Flash
28.5
Rank #85/100 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.2
winner40.4%
Rank #62/184 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
27.1%
Rank #150/184 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
79.7
Rank #42/89 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner95.8
Rank #1/89 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.2
winner88.4
Rank #6/92 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Ling 2.6 Flash
48.9
Rank #66/92 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.2
winner43.8
Rank #15/89 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Ling 2.6 Flash
15.4
Rank #83/89 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.2
winner90.3
Rank #17/95 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Ling 2.6 Flash
59.3
Rank #84/95 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.2
winner35.4
Rank #20/95 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Ling 2.6 Flash
6.2
Rank #75/95 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.2
winner42.2
Rank #20/98 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Ling 2.6 Flash
14.1
Rank #86/98 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.2
winner75.4
Rank #21/87 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Ling 2.6 Flash
57.4
Rank #55/87 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.2
winner79.1
Rank #22/75 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Ling 2.6 Flash
23.5
Rank #72/75 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.2
84.8
Rank #45/85 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner86.0
Rank #42/85 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GPT-5.2 | Ling 2.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GPT-5.2 | Ling 2.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
0 tests | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Ling 2.6 Flash |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GPT-5.2 and Ling 2.6 Flash: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | GPT-5.2 | Ling 2.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | GPT-5.2 GPT-5.2 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests. | Ling 2.6 Flash Ling 2.6 Flash does not clearly lead on the verified metrics here, so check provider-specific pricing before choosing. |
TL;DR: GPT-5.2 leads across 108 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from GPT-5.2 vs Ling 2.6 Flash into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
| No data |
| Model metadata | GPT-5.2 exposes 400K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output. | Ling 2.6 Flash exposes 262.1K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs. |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | inclusionAI |
| Context window | 400K tokens | 262.1K tokens |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 32.8K tokens |
| Released | Dec 2025 | Apr 2026 |
| Modalities | Input FileImageText Output Text | Input Text Output Text |
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | GPT | Other |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | openai/gpt-5.2 | inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash |
| References | No data | No data |
speed / latency
N/A / N/A
input / output
No data
APDSM0 tests | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Ling 2.6 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
CM-API 公益站0 tests | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Ling 2.6 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
Dext API0 tests | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.021/M/$0.164/M | Ling 2.6 Flash inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.0033/M/$0.0099/M |
|---|
OpenRouter0 tests | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Ling 2.6 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
