Data points: 65
Model compare
The readout for GPT-5.2 and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: GPT-5.2. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 66.7 to 33.3.
Evidence depth
65 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 6 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GPT-5.2
The charts below split 6 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GPT-5.2 and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | GPT-5.2 | Llama 3.2 1B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 66.7 pts | 33.3 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 0 categories | 0 categories |
| Operational advantages | Free providers, Provider coverage | Cheapest input price |
| Context window | 400K tokens | 60K tokens |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 60K tokens |
| Modalities | Input FileImageText Output Text |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | GPT-5.2 | Llama 3.2 1B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | Meta |
| Released | Dec 2025 | Sep 2024 |
| Parameters | No data | 1B |
| Tokenizer | GPT | Llama3 |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | 2023-12-31 |
| OpenRouter ID | openai/gpt-5.2 | meta-llama/llama-3.2-1b-instruct |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GPT-5.2 and Llama 3.2 1B Instruct: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 has these operational advantages: Free providers, Provider coverage.
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct has these operational advantages: Cheapest input price.
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
GPT-5.2
52.8
Avg. score
Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
-
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2
No data
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
No shared professional benchmark scores are available yet.
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GPT-5.2 | Llama 3.2 1B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GPT-5.2 | Llama 3.2 1B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
0 tests | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Llama 3.2 1B Instruct speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.024/M/$0.192/M | Llama 3.2 1B Instruct llama-3.2-1b-instruct speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0/M |
0 tests | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Llama 3.2 1B Instruct speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Llama 3.2 1B Instruct speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Llama 3.2 1B Instruct speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-chat-latest speed / latency No data input / output $0/request | Llama 3.2 1B Instruct llama-3.2-1b-instruct speed / latency No data input / output $0/request |
Weighted outcome: GPT-5.2. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Input
Output
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputText output |
|---|
