LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 80

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for GPT-5.2 and MiMo-V2.5, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

GPT-5.2

GPT-5.2 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 4 to 1.

Evidence depth

80 data points

Includes 8 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 10 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with GPT-5.2

The charts below split 18 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

GPT-5.2 vs MiMo-V2.5

gpt-5-2-vs-mimo-v2-5

Model A

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

Model B

MiMo-V2.5

Overall leaderLeadingContender
Verified metric wins4 wins1 wins
Where it leadsCheapest input price, First-token latency, Provider coverage, Recent testsAverage speed
Model metadataGPT-5.2 exposes 128K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.MiMo-V2.5 exposes 1.0M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, Audio input, Text output.
DeveloperOpenAINo data
Context window128K tokens1.0M tokens
Max output16.4K tokens131.1K tokens
ReleasedDec 2025Apr 2026
Modalities

Input

FileImageText

Output

Text

Input

TextAudioImagevideo

Output

Text
Features
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode
Text inputImage inputAudio inputText outputTool callingJSON modeReasoning
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerGPTOther
Knowledge cutoffNo dataNo data
OpenRouter IDopenai/gpt-5.2-chatxiaomi/mimo-v2.5
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
OpenAIGPT-5.2
MiMo-V2.5
Output price
$14.00/M#43
$0.280/M#4
Input price
$1.75/M#35
$0.140/M#8
GPQA
90.3%#9
84.9%#32
HLE
35.4%#9
25.2%#29
SciCode
52.1%#9
43.1%#30
Blended price
$4.81/M#62
$0.175/M#10
Output speed
72.8 tok/s#71
81.3 tok/s#63
Time to first token
115.69 s#108
3.34 s#77

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
OpenAIGPT-5.2
MiMo-V2.5
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
OpenAIGPT-5.2
MiMo-V2.5
N1N15 tests
OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

56 tok/s / 1798ms

input / output

No data

MiMo-V2.5

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

星见雅 API15 tests
OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

52 tok/s / 2671ms

input / output

No data

MiMo-V2.5

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

PackyAPI10 tests
OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

94 tok/s / 11492ms

input / output

No data

MiMo-V2.5

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

6345ywz API5 tests
OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

MiMo-V2.5

speed / latency

66 tok/s / 6202ms

input / output

No data

OpenCode5 tests
OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

MiMo-V2.5

speed / latency

84 tok/s / 2128ms

input / output

No data

Newagiai
OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2-all

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0068/M / $0.0068/M

MiMo-V2.5

mimo-v2.5

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.384/M / $1.92/M

柏拉图AI
OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2-all

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0068/M / $0.0068/M

MiMo-V2.5

mimo-v2.5

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.384/M / $1.92/M

Zero API
OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.120/M / $0.959/M

MiMo-V2.5

mimo-v2.5

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0096/M / $0.019/M

小豆包API
OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2-all

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.010/M

MiMo-V2.5

mimo-v2.5

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.575/M / $2.88/M

神马中转API
OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2-all

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.014/M / $0.014/M

MiMo-V2.5

mimo-v2.5

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.767/M / $3.84/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for GPT-5.2 and MiMo-V2.5: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
OpenAIGPT-5.2
MiMo-V2.5
When to choose each model

GPT-5.2

GPT-5.2 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, First-token latency, Provider coverage, Recent tests.

MiMo-V2.5

MiMo-V2.5 is stronger when you prioritize Average speed.

FAQ

TL;DR: GPT-5.2 leads across 80 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from GPT-5.2 vs MiMo-V2.5 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

OpenAIGPT-5.2 vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.26 verified data pointsOpenAIGPT-5 vs GPT-5.26 verified data pointsGeminiGemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-5.26 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 03:00 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.