Data points: 87
Model compare
The readout for GPT-5.2 and MiniMax M2.1, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: GPT-5.2. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 69.3 to 30.7.
Evidence depth
87 data points
Includes 11 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 8 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GPT-5.2
The charts below split 19 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GPT-5.2 and MiniMax M2.1: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | GPT-5.2 | MiniMax M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 69.3 pts | 30.7 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 2 categories | 1 categories |
| Operational advantages | Cheapest input price, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage | Average speed |
| Context window | 400K tokens | 204.8K tokens |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 131.1K tokens |
| Modalities | Input FileImageText Output Text |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | GPT-5.2 | MiniMax M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | MiniMax |
| Released | Dec 2025 | Dec 2025 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | GPT | Other |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | openai/gpt-5.2 | minimax/minimax-m2.1 |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GPT-5.2 and MiniMax M2.1: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 is stronger in benchmark categories (Coding, Math) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage).
MiniMax M2.1
MiniMax M2.1 is stronger in benchmark categories (Reasoning) and operational dimensions (Average speed).
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
GPT-5.2
52.9
Avg. score
MiniMax M2.1
54.9
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 leads by 1.2
MiniMax M2.1 leads by 2.4
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 leads by 4.2
No data
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
GPT-5.2
winner0.62 s
Rank #17/139 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.1
27.56 s
Rank #102/139 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner0.62 s
Rank #25/139 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.1
1.01 s
Rank #59/139 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
62.2 tok/s
Rank #92/139 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.1
winner75.3 tok/s
Rank #82/139 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
$4.81/M
Rank #134/163 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.1
winner$0.525/M
Rank #42/163 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
$14.00/M
Rank #135/163 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.1
winner$1.20/M
Rank #44/163 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
$1.75/M
Rank #122/163 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.1
winner$0.300/M
Rank #46/163 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
81.4%
Rank #54/125 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.1
winner87.5%
Rank #9/125 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
7.3%
Rank #108/186 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.1
winner22.2%
Rank #49/186 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
71.2%
Rank #110/187 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.1
winner83.0%
Rank #57/187 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
66.9%
Rank #36/115 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.1
winner81.0%
Rank #15/115 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
40.4%
Rank #63/184 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.1
winner40.7%
Rank #60/184 · confidence 4
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GPT-5.2 | MiniMax M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GPT-5.2 | MiniMax M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
15 tests | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 56 tok/s / 1798ms input / output No data | MiniMax M2.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
15 tests | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 52 tok/s / 2671ms input / output No data | MiniMax M2.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
5 tests | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 64 tok/s / 5256ms input / output No data | MiniMax M2.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
5 tests | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 55 tok/s / 1434ms input / output No data | MiniMax M2.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
5 tests | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | MiniMax M2.1 speed / latency 61 tok/s / 6393ms input / output No data |
GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-openai-compact speed / latency No data input / output $75.00/M/$600.00/M | MiniMax M2.1 minimax-m2.1 speed / latency No data input / output $0/M | |
GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2 speed / latency No data input / output $0.0041/request | MiniMax M2.1 minimax-m2.1 speed / latency No data input / output $0.863/M | |
GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2 speed / latency No data input / output $0.0068/request | MiniMax M2.1 minimax-m2.1 speed / latency No data input / output $0.288/M |
Weighted outcome: GPT-5.2. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Input
Output
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputText outputTool callingJSON modeReasoning |
|---|
