Data points: 111
Model compare
The readout for GPT-5.2 and MiniMax M2.7, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: GPT-5.2. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 60 to 40.
Evidence depth
111 data points
Includes 23 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 7 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GPT-5.2
The charts below split 30 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GPT-5.2 and MiniMax M2.7: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | GPT-5.2 | MiniMax M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 60.0 pts | 40.0 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 3 categories | 2 categories |
| Operational advantages | First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage | Cheapest input price, Average speed |
| Context window | 400K tokens | 204.8K tokens |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 131.1K tokens |
| Modalities | Input FileImageText Output Text |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | GPT-5.2 | MiniMax M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | MiniMax |
| Released | Dec 2025 | Mar 2026 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | GPT | Other |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | openai/gpt-5.2 | minimax/minimax-m2.7 |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GPT-5.2 and MiniMax M2.7: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 is stronger in benchmark categories (Agents, Coding, Knowledge) and operational dimensions (First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage).
MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax M2.7 is stronger in benchmark categories (Reasoning, Instruction following) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, Average speed).
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
GPT-5.2
52.9
Avg. score
MiniMax M2.7
51
GPT-5.2 leads by 3.0
GPT-5.2 leads by 9.4
MiniMax M2.7 leads by 0.1
GPT-5.2 leads by 4.3
GPT-5.2
No data
GPT-5.2
MiniMax M2.7 leads by 0.1
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
GPT-5.2
winner53.0
Rank #50/84 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
MiniMax M2.7
51.0
Rank #56/84 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.2
$4.81/M
Rank #132/162 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.7
winner$0.525/M
Rank #41/162 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
$14.00/M
Rank #133/162 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.7
winner$1.20/M
Rank #43/162 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
$1.75/M
Rank #120/162 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.7
winner$0.300/M
Rank #46/162 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner72.7
Rank #13/89 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
MiniMax M2.7
68.7
Rank #27/89 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.2
winner11.6
Rank #20/73 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
MiniMax M2.7
0.6
Rank #65/73 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.2
71.2%
Rank #110/188 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.7
winner87.4%
Rank #32/188 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
7.3%
Rank #109/187 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.7
winner28.1%
Rank #34/187 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner53.5
Rank #6/33 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
MiniMax M2.7
27.0
Rank #15/33 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.2
winner52.1
Rank #18/96 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
MiniMax M2.7
47.0
Rank #31/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.2
55.6
Rank #25/37 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
MiniMax M2.7
winner56.2
Rank #23/37 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.2
40.4%
Rank #64/185 · confidence 4
MiniMax M2.7
winner47.0%
Rank #25/185 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner52.2
Rank #34/65 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
MiniMax M2.7
41.4
Rank #54/65 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.2
winner43.8
Rank #16/90 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
MiniMax M2.7
26.1
Rank #53/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.2
winner90.3
Rank #19/96 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
MiniMax M2.7
87.4
Rank #35/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.2
winner35.4
Rank #21/96 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
MiniMax M2.7
28.1
Rank #34/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.2
winner42.2
Rank #22/99 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
MiniMax M2.7
38.1
Rank #37/99 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.2
winner79.7
Rank #39/90 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
MiniMax M2.7
34.4
Rank #79/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.2
1219.0
Rank #35/66 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
MiniMax M2.7
winner1271.0
Rank #25/66 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.2
75.4
Rank #21/86 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
MiniMax M2.7
winner75.7
Rank #18/86 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.2
winner46.5
Rank #29/50 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
MiniMax M2.7
40.4
Rank #36/50 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.2
22.0
Rank #48/53 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
MiniMax M2.7
winner45.1
Rank #38/53 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
GPT-5.2
84.8
Rank #44/84 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
MiniMax M2.7
84.8
Rank #44/84 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-03-18
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GPT-5.2 | MiniMax M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GPT-5.2 | MiniMax M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
110 tests | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | MiniMax M2.7 speed / latency 430 tok/s / 2481ms input / output No data |
15 tests | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 56 tok/s / 1798ms input / output No data | MiniMax M2.7 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
15 tests | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 52 tok/s / 2671ms input / output No data | MiniMax M2.7 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
10 tests | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 94 tok/s / 11492ms input / output No data | MiniMax M2.7 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
10 tests | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 71 tok/s / 2893ms input / output No data | MiniMax M2.7 speed / latency 90 tok/s / 2719ms input / output No data |
GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-2025-12-11 speed / latency No data input / output $15.00/M/$120.00/M | MiniMax M2.7 minimaxai/minimax-m2.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0/request | |
GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2 speed / latency No data input / output $0.024/M/$0.192/M | MiniMax M2.7 minimax-m2.7 speed / latency No data input / output $0/M |
Weighted outcome: GPT-5.2. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Input
Output
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
|---|
