LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 81

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for GPT-5.4 and Kimi K2 Thinking, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 5 to 0.

Evidence depth

81 data points

Includes 8 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 8 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with GPT-5.4

The charts below split 16 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

GPT-5.4 vs Kimi K2 Thinking

gpt-5-4-vs-kimi-k2-thinking

Model A

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

Model B

MoonshotAI

Kimi K2 Thinking

Overall leaderLeadingContender
Verified metric wins5 wins0 wins
Where it leadsCheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Provider coverage, Recent testsNo data
Model metadataGPT-5.4 exposes 1.1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.Kimi K2 Thinking exposes 262.1K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs.
DeveloperOpenAIMoonshot AI
Context window1.1M tokens262.1K tokens
Max output128K tokens262.1K tokens
ReleasedMar 2026Nov 2025
Modalities

Input

TextImageFile

Output

Text

Input

Text

Output

Text
Features
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerGPTOther
Knowledge cutoffNo dataNo data
OpenRouter IDopenai/gpt-5.4moonshotai/kimi-k2-thinking
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
OpenAIGPT-5.4
MoonshotAIKimi K2 Thinking
GPQA
92.0%#3
83.8%#39
SciCode
56.6%#3
42.4%#35
HLE
41.6%#4
22.3%#35
Input price
$2.50/M#37
$0.600/M#23
Output price
$15.00/M#44
$2.50/M#27
Time to first token
134.24 s#110
0.93 s#33
Output speed
92.4 tok/s#56
128.6 tok/s#38
Blended price
$5.63/M#63
$1.07/M#40

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
OpenAIGPT-5.4
MoonshotAIKimi K2 Thinking
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
OpenAIGPT-5.4
MoonshotAIKimi K2 Thinking
天宫造物50 tests
OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

50 tok/s / 7305ms

input / output

No data

MoonshotAI

Kimi K2 Thinking

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

星见雅 API20 tests
OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

49 tok/s / 5435ms

input / output

No data

MoonshotAI

Kimi K2 Thinking

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

6345ywz API15 tests
OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

41 tok/s / 6581ms

input / output

No data

MoonshotAI

Kimi K2 Thinking

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Fengsili API10 tests
OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

88 tok/s / 6075ms

input / output

No data

MoonshotAI

Kimi K2 Thinking

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Omini Api10 tests
OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

51 tok/s / 1443ms

input / output

No data

MoonshotAI

Kimi K2 Thinking

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

ZetaTechs API
OpenAI

GPT-5.4

gpt-5.4-free

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

MoonshotAI

Kimi K2 Thinking

kimi-k2-thinking

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$1.12/M / $4.48/M

3173721 API
OpenAI

GPT-5.4

gpt-5.4-openai-compact

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$75.00/M / $450.00/M

MoonshotAI

Kimi K2 Thinking

daipai/moonshotai/kimi-k2-thinking

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0010/M / $0.0010/M

紫脑喵
OpenAI

GPT-5.4

gpt-5.4-high

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.050/M / $0.050/M

MoonshotAI

Kimi K2 Thinking

kimi-k2-thinking

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.010/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for GPT-5.4 and Kimi K2 Thinking: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
OpenAIGPT-5.4
MoonshotAIKimi K2 Thinking
When to choose each model

GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Provider coverage, Recent tests.

Kimi K2 Thinking

Kimi K2 Thinking does not clearly lead on the verified metrics here, so check provider-specific pricing before choosing.

FAQ

TL;DR: GPT-5.4 leads across 81 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from GPT-5.4 vs Kimi K2 Thinking into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsOpenAIGPT-5 vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsOpenAIGPT-5.2 vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsGeminiGemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-5.46 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 04:19 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.