Data points: 116
The readout for GPT-5.4 and Ling 2.6 Flash, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
GPT-5.4
GPT-5.4 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 4 to 0.
Evidence depth
116 data points
Includes 27 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 5 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GPT-5.4
The charts below split 32 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
Model compare GPT-5.4 vs Ling 2.6 Flashgpt-5-4-vs-ling-2-6-flash | Model A GPT-5.4 | Model B Ling 2.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Verified metric wins | 4 wins | 0 wins |
| Where it leads | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
GPT-5.4
59
Avg. score
Ling 2.6 Flash
39.7
Selected category
Coding
GPT-5.4 leads by 40.8
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
GPT-5.4
winner85.0
Rank #4/127 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-05
Ling 2.6 Flash
37.0
Rank #91/127 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.4
winner0.68 s
Rank #19/139 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
0.74 s
Rank #25/139 · confidence 4
GPT-5.4
winner0.68 s
Rank #26/139 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
0.74 s
Rank #34/139 · confidence 4
GPT-5.4
103.9 tok/s
Rank #62/139 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner180.9 tok/s
Rank #27/139 · confidence 4
GPT-5.4
$5.63/M
Rank #141/167 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner$0.150/M
Rank #7/167 · confidence 4
GPT-5.4
$2.50/M
Rank #137/167 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner$0.100/M
Rank #7/167 · confidence 4
GPT-5.4
$15.00/M
Rank #142/167 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner$0.300/M
Rank #8/167 · confidence 4
GPT-5.4
winner74.0
Rank #5/88 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-05
Ling 2.6 Flash
25.0
Rank #84/88 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.4
winner10.6%
Rank #89/186 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
6.2%
Rank #125/186 · confidence 4
GPT-5.4
winner74.8%
Rank #95/187 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
59.3%
Rank #142/187 · confidence 4
GPT-5.4
winner56.6
Rank #2/95 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-05
Ling 2.6 Flash
27.1
Rank #88/95 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.4
winner57.6
Rank #4/86 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-05
Ling 2.6 Flash
21.2
Rank #66/86 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.4
winner86.4
Rank #6/100 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-05
Ling 2.6 Flash
28.5
Rank #85/100 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.4
winner71.0
Rank #9/54 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-05
Ling 2.6 Flash
25.3
Rank #43/54 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.4
winner47.1%
Rank #22/184 · confidence 4
Ling 2.6 Flash
27.1%
Rank #150/184 · confidence 4
GPT-5.4
88.6
Rank #19/89 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-05
Ling 2.6 Flash
winner95.8
Rank #1/89 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.4
winner96.8
Rank #1/92 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-05
Ling 2.6 Flash
48.9
Rank #66/92 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.4
winner41.6
Rank #6/95 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-05
Ling 2.6 Flash
6.2
Rank #75/95 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.4
winner51.4
Rank #8/98 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-05
Ling 2.6 Flash
14.1
Rank #86/98 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.4
winner92.0
Rank #9/95 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-05
Ling 2.6 Flash
59.3
Rank #84/95 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.4
winner50.0
Rank #9/89 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-05
Ling 2.6 Flash
15.4
Rank #83/89 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.4
winner92.6
Rank #2/75 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-05
Ling 2.6 Flash
23.5
Rank #72/75 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.4
winner73.9
Rank #24/87 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-05
Ling 2.6 Flash
57.4
Rank #55/87 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.4
winner41.1
Rank #10/50 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-05
Ling 2.6 Flash
2.3
Rank #44/50 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.4
winner44.8
Rank #10/44 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-05
Ling 2.6 Flash
2.1
Rank #44/44 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.4
winner1395.0
Rank #12/50 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-05
Ling 2.6 Flash
542.0
Rank #45/50 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
GPT-5.4
winner87.1
Rank #38/85 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-03-05
Ling 2.6 Flash
86.0
Rank #42/85 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-21
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GPT-5.4 | Ling 2.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GPT-5.4 | Ling 2.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
0 tests | GPT-5.4 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Ling 2.6 Flash |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GPT-5.4 and Ling 2.6 Flash: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | GPT-5.4 | Ling 2.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | GPT-5.4 GPT-5.4 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests. | Ling 2.6 Flash Ling 2.6 Flash does not clearly lead on the verified metrics here, so check provider-specific pricing before choosing. |
TL;DR: GPT-5.4 leads across 116 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from GPT-5.4 vs Ling 2.6 Flash into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
| No data |
| Model metadata | GPT-5.4 exposes 1.1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output. | Ling 2.6 Flash exposes 262.1K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs. |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | OpenAI | inclusionAI |
| Context window | 1.1M tokens | 262.1K tokens |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 32.8K tokens |
| Released | Mar 2026 | Apr 2026 |
| Modalities | Input TextImageFile Output Text | Input Text Output Text |
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | GPT | Other |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | openai/gpt-5.4 | inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash |
| References | No data | No data |
speed / latency
N/A / N/A
input / output
No data
APDSM0 tests | GPT-5.4 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Ling 2.6 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
CM-API 公益站0 tests | GPT-5.4 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Ling 2.6 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
Dext API0 tests | GPT-5.4 gpt-5.4 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.120/M/$0.719/M | Ling 2.6 Flash inclusionai/ling-2.6-flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.0033/M/$0.0099/M |
|---|
OpenRouter0 tests | GPT-5.4 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Ling 2.6 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
