LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 85

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for GPT-5.4 and MiniMax M2.7, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

Tie

Tie currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 3 to 3.

Evidence depth

85 data points

Includes 8 benchmark rows, 1 audit samples, and 8 provider examples.

Selection signal

Tie

The charts below split 17 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

GPT-5.4 vs MiniMax M2.7

gpt-5-4-vs-minimax-m2-7

Model A

OpenAI

GPT-5.4

Model B

Minimax

MiniMax M2.7

Overall leaderTieTie
Verified metric wins3 wins3 wins
Where it leadsFirst-token latency, Provider coverage, Recent testsCheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers
Model metadataGPT-5.4 exposes 1.1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.MiniMax M2.7 exposes 204.8K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs.
DeveloperOpenAINo data
Context window1.1M tokens204.8K tokens
Max output128K tokens131.1K tokens
ReleasedMar 2026Mar 2026
Modalities

Input

TextImageFile

Output

Text

Input

Text

Output

Text
Features
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerGPTOther
Knowledge cutoffNo dataNo data
OpenRouter IDopenai/gpt-5.4minimax/minimax-m2.7
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
OpenAIGPT-5.4
MinimaxMiniMax M2.7
GPQA
92.0%#3
87.4%#18
SciCode
56.6%#3
47.0%#15
HLE
41.6%#4
28.1%#17
Input price
$2.50/M#37
$0.300/M#15
Output price
$15.00/M#44
$1.20/M#18
Blended price
$5.63/M#63
$0.525/M#25
Output speed
92.4 tok/s#56
43.5 tok/s#97
Time to first token
134.24 s#110
1.59 s#61

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
OpenAIGPT-5.4
MinimaxMiniMax M2.7
6345ywz APIWinner: MiniMax M2.7
OpenAI

GPT-5.4

gpt-5.4

No audit yet

Minimax

MiniMax M2.7

FAST/minimax-m2.7

Audit score

78

View report
766668100

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
OpenAIGPT-5.4
MinimaxMiniMax M2.7
Mars HK125 tests
OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

49 tok/s / 6084ms

input / output

No data

Minimax

MiniMax M2.7

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

6345ywz API115 tests
OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

41 tok/s / 6581ms

input / output

No data

Minimax

MiniMax M2.7

speed / latency

430 tok/s / 2470ms

input / output

No data

星见雅 API20 tests
OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

49 tok/s / 5435ms

input / output

No data

Minimax

MiniMax M2.7

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Fengsili API10 tests
OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

88 tok/s / 6075ms

input / output

No data

Minimax

MiniMax M2.7

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

GGBand API10 tests
OpenAI

GPT-5.4

speed / latency

61 tok/s / 3483ms

input / output

No data

Minimax

MiniMax M2.7

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Dibin84 API Hub
OpenAI

GPT-5.4

gpt-5.4-openai-compact

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$2.50/M / $15.00/M

Minimax

MiniMax M2.7

minimaxai/minimax-m2.7

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

ZetaTechs API
OpenAI

GPT-5.4

gpt-5.4-free

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

Minimax

MiniMax M2.7

minimax-m2.7

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.587/M / $2.35/M

3173721 API
OpenAI

GPT-5.4

gpt-5.4-openai-compact

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$75.00/M / $450.00/M

Minimax

MiniMax M2.7

minimax-m2.7

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0010/M / $0.0010/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for GPT-5.4 and MiniMax M2.7: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
OpenAIGPT-5.4
MinimaxMiniMax M2.7
When to choose each model

GPT-5.4

GPT-5.4 is stronger when you prioritize First-token latency, Provider coverage, Recent tests.

MiniMax M2.7

MiniMax M2.7 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers.

FAQ

TL;DR: Tie leads across 85 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from GPT-5.4 vs MiniMax M2.7 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsOpenAIGPT-5 vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsOpenAIGPT-5.2 vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsGeminiGemini 2.5 Pro vs GPT-5.46 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 04:24 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.