Data points: 67
The readout for GPT-OSS and Mistral Nemo, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
GPT-OSS
GPT-OSS currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 5 to 1.
Evidence depth
67 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 6 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GPT-OSS
The charts below split 6 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Model compare GPT-OSS vs Mistral Nemogpt-oss-vs-mistral-nemo | Model A GPT-OSS | Model B Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Verified metric wins | 5 wins | 1 wins |
| Where it leads | Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
| Metric | GPT-OSS | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| No shared benchmark metrics are available yet. | ||
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GPT-OSS | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GPT-OSS | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
40 tests | GPT-OSS speed / latency 41 tok/s / 2851ms input / output No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GPT-OSS and Mistral Nemo: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | GPT-OSS | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | GPT-OSS GPT-OSS is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests. | Mistral Nemo Mistral Nemo is stronger when you prioritize First-token latency. |
TL;DR: GPT-OSS leads across 67 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from GPT-OSS vs Mistral Nemo into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
| First-token latency |
| Model metadata | GPT-OSS exposes 131.1K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Reasoning. | Mistral Nemo exposes 131.1K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs. |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | No data | Mistral AI |
| Context window | 131.1K tokens | 131.1K tokens |
| Max output | 131.1K tokens | No data |
| Released | Aug 2025 | Jul 2024 |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | Input Text Output Text |
| Features | Text inputText outputTool callingReasoning | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode |
| Parameters | 120B | No data |
| Tokenizer | GPT | Mistral |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2024-06-30 | 2024-04-30 |
| OpenRouter ID | openai/gpt-oss-120b:free | mistralai/mistral-nemo |
| References | No data | No data |
Mistral Nemo
speed / latency
N/A / N/A
input / output
No data
RinkoAI10 tests | GPT-OSS speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Mistral Nemo speed / latency 41 tok/s / 2154ms input / output No data |
|---|
91VIP0 tests | GPT-OSS speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Mistral Nemo speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
AI API0 tests | GPT-OSS gpt-oss-120b speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $2.20/M / $8.80/M | Mistral Nemo mistralai/mistral-nemo speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.040/M / $0.080/M |
|---|
APDSM0 tests | GPT-OSS speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Mistral Nemo speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
GPT-OSS gpt-oss-20b speed / latency No data input / output $0.027/M / $0.110/M | Mistral Nemo mistral-nemo speed / latency No data input / output $10.27/M / $30.82/M |
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
