Data points: 77
Model compare
The readout for Kimi K2.5 and Mistral Large, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: Kimi K2.5. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 100 to 0.
Evidence depth
77 data points
Includes 7 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 8 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Kimi K2.5
The charts below split 15 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Kimi K2.5 and Mistral Large: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | Kimi K2.5 | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 100.0 pts | 0.0 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 3 categories | 0 categories |
| Operational advantages | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage | No data |
| Context window | 262.1K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Max output | 262.1K tokens | No data |
| Modalities | Input TextImage Output Text | Input |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | Kimi K2.5 | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | MoonshotAI | Mistralai |
| Released | Jan 2026 | Dec 2025 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Other | Mistral |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | 2024-11-30 |
| OpenRouter ID | moonshotai/kimi-k2.5 | mistralai/mistral-large |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Kimi K2.5 and Mistral Large: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5 is stronger in benchmark categories (Coding, Reasoning, Math) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage).
Mistral Large
Mistral Large does not clearly lead in the benchmark or operational dimensions shared by both models.
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
Kimi K2.5
49.8
Avg. score
Mistral Large
35.9
Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5 leads by 13.4
Kimi K2.5 leads by 20.3
Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5 leads by 12.9
Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
Kimi K2.5
winner$0.600/M
Rank #81/163 · confidence 4
Mistral Large
$4.00/M
Rank #145/163 · confidence 4
Kimi K2.5
winner$1.20/M
Rank #86/163 · confidence 4
Mistral Large
$6.00/M
Rank #139/163 · confidence 4
Kimi K2.5
winner$3.00/M
Rank #86/163 · confidence 4
Mistral Large
$12.00/M
Rank #132/163 · confidence 4
Kimi K2.5
winner87.1%
Rank #11/125 · confidence 4 · eval date 2026-02-01
Mistral Large
51.5%
Rank #119/125 · confidence 4
Kimi K2.5
winner78.9%
Rank #78/187 · confidence 4
Mistral Large
35.1%
Rank #180/187 · confidence 4
Kimi K2.5
winner12.3%
Rank #83/186 · confidence 4
Mistral Large
3.4%
Rank #178/186 · confidence 4
Kimi K2.5
winner39.6%
Rank #75/184 · confidence 4
Mistral Large
20.8%
Rank #171/184 · confidence 4
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Kimi K2.5 | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Kimi K2.5 | Mistral Large |
|---|---|---|
20 tests | Kimi K2.5 speed / latency 48 tok/s / 18528ms input / output No data | Mistral Large speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Kimi K2.5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Mistral Large speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Kimi K2.5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Mistral Large speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Kimi K2.5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Mistral Large speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Kimi K2.5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Mistral Large speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Kimi K2.5 kimi-k2.5 speed / latency No data input / output $0/M/$0/M | Mistral Large mistral-large speed / latency No data input / output $0/M | |
Kimi K2.5 kimi-k2.5 speed / latency No data input / output $0.010/request | Mistral Large mistralai/mistral-large speed / latency No data input / output $0.010/request | |
Kimi K2.5 kimi-k2.5 speed / latency No data input / output $0.010/request | Mistral Large mistral-large-latest speed / latency No data input / output $3.00/M |
Weighted outcome: Kimi K2.5. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Output
| Features | Text inputImage inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode |
|---|
