Data points: 54
The readout for Kimi K2.5 and Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 4 to 0.
Evidence depth
54 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 6 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Kimi K2.5
The charts below split 6 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Model compare Kimi K2.5 vs Phi 3.5 MoE Instructkimi-k2-5-vs-phi-3-5-moe-instruct | Model A Kimi K2.5 | Model B Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Verified metric wins | 4 wins | 0 wins |
| Where it leads | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests | No data |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
| Metric | Kimi K2.5 | Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| No shared benchmark metrics are available yet. | ||
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Kimi K2.5 | Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Kimi K2.5 | Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct |
|---|---|---|
25 tests | Kimi K2.5 英伟达/moonshotai/kimi-k2.5 speed / latency 38 tok/s / 22910ms input / output $0/M / $0/M |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Kimi K2.5 and Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | Kimi K2.5 | Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | Kimi K2.5 Kimi K2.5 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests. | Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct does not clearly lead on the verified metrics here, so check provider-specific pricing before choosing. |
TL;DR: Kimi K2.5 leads across 54 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from Kimi K2.5 vs Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
| Model metadata | Kimi K2.5 exposes 262.1K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, Text output, Tool calling. | No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model. |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Moonshot AI | No data |
| Context window | 262.1K tokens | No data |
| Max output | 262.1K tokens | No data |
| Released | Jan 2026 | No data |
| Modalities | Input TextImage Output Text | No data |
| Features | Text inputImage inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | None listed |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Other | No data |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | moonshotai/kimi-k2.5 | No data |
| References | No data | No data |
Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct
英伟达/microsoft/phi-3.5-moe-instruct
speed / latency
N/A / N/A
input / output
$0/M / $0/M
NVIDIA NIM20 tests | Kimi K2.5 speed / latency 48 tok/s / 18528ms input / output No data | Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
6345ywz API0 tests | Kimi K2.5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
9527 API0 tests | Kimi K2.5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
AI Claw API0 tests | Kimi K2.5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
Kimi K2.5 moonshotai/kimi-k2.5 speed / latency No data input / output $0.010/M / $0.010/M | Phi 3.5 MoE Instruct phi-3.5-moe-instruct speed / latency No data input / output $0.010/M / $0.010/M |
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
