Data points: 68
Model compare
The readout for Kimi K2.5 and Qwen3.5 Omni Plus, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: Kimi K2.5. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 56 to 44.
Evidence depth
68 data points
Includes 6 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 7 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Kimi K2.5
The charts below split 13 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Kimi K2.5 and Qwen3.5 Omni Plus: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | Kimi K2.5 | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 56.0 pts | 44.0 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 1 categories | 1 categories |
| Operational advantages | Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage | First-token latency |
| Context window | 262.1K tokens | No data |
| Max output | 262.1K tokens | No data |
| Modalities | Input TextImage Output Text | No data |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | Kimi K2.5 | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | MoonshotAI | No data |
| Released | Jan 2026 | No data |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Other | No data |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | moonshotai/kimi-k2.5 | No data |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Kimi K2.5 and Qwen3.5 Omni Plus: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5 is stronger in benchmark categories (Reasoning) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage).
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus is stronger in benchmark categories (Coding) and operational dimensions (First-token latency).
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
Kimi K2.5
49.7
Avg. score
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus
53.4
Kimi K2.5
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus leads by 4.9
Kimi K2.5 leads by 2.8
Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5
Kimi K2.5
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
Kimi K2.5
$0.600/M
Rank #80/162 · confidence 4
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus
winner$0.400/M
Rank #60/162 · confidence 4
Kimi K2.5
winner$1.20/M
Rank #85/162 · confidence 4
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus
$1.50/M
Rank #92/162 · confidence 4
Kimi K2.5
winner$3.00/M
Rank #85/162 · confidence 4
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus
$4.80/M
Rank #103/162 · confidence 4
Kimi K2.5
78.9%
Rank #79/188 · confidence 4
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus
winner82.6%
Rank #62/188 · confidence 4
Kimi K2.5
12.3%
Rank #84/187 · confidence 4
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus
winner13.9%
Rank #77/187 · confidence 4
Kimi K2.5
39.6%
Rank #76/185 · confidence 4
Qwen3.5 Omni Plus
winner40.5%
Rank #63/185 · confidence 4
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Kimi K2.5 | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Kimi K2.5 | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus |
|---|---|---|
145 tests | Kimi K2.5 speed / latency 45 tok/s / 2058ms input / output No data | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus speed / latency 36 tok/s / 2149ms input / output No data |
5 tests | Kimi K2.5 speed / latency 14 tok/s / 32712ms input / output No data | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Kimi K2.5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Kimi K2.5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Kimi K2.5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Kimi K2.5 kimi-k2.5 speed / latency No data input / output $0.010/request | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus qwen3.5-omni-plus-nx speed / latency No data input / output $0.010/request | |
Kimi K2.5 kimi-k2.5 speed / latency No data input / output $0.058/M/$1.75/M | Qwen3.5 Omni Plus qwen3.5-omni-plus speed / latency No data input / output $1.00/request |
Weighted outcome: Kimi K2.5. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
| Features |
|---|
Text inputImage inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
| None listed |
