Data points: 56
Model compare
The readout for Laguna S 2.1 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: Laguna S 2.1. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
Laguna S 2.1
Laguna S 2.1 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 80 to 20.
Evidence depth
56 data points
Includes 6 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 5 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Laguna S 2.1
The charts below split 11 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Laguna S 2.1 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | Laguna S 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 80.0 pts | 20.0 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 2 categories | 0 categories |
| Operational advantages | No data | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 1.1M tokens |
| Max output | 131.1K tokens | 131.1K tokens |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | Input Text |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | Laguna S 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Poolside | Xiaomi |
| Released | Jul 2026 | Apr 2026 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Other | Other |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | poolside/laguna-s-2.1 | xiaomi/mimo-v2.5-pro |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Laguna S 2.1 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
Laguna S 2.1
Laguna S 2.1 leads these benchmark categories: Agents, Coding.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro has these operational advantages: Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage.
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
Laguna S 2.1
53.8
Avg. score
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
53.6
Laguna S 2.1 leads by 2.4
Laguna S 2.1 leads by 3.4
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
No data
No data
No data
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
Laguna S 2.1
59.0
Rank #36/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-07-21
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
59.0
Rank #36/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-22
Laguna S 2.1
winner59.4
Rank #13/42 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-07-21
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
57.2
Rank #21/42 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-22
Laguna S 2.1
winner70.2
Rank #13/30 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-07-21
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
68.4
Rank #16/30 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-22
Laguna S 2.1
winner43.5
Rank #55/71 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-07-21
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
39.4
Rank #61/71 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-22
Laguna S 2.1
winner70.2
Rank #16/50 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-07-21
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
68.4
Rank #19/50 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-22
Laguna S 2.1
winner65.0
Rank #26/59 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-07-21
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
62.2
Rank #30/59 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-22
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Laguna S 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Laguna S 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro |
|---|---|---|
5 tests | Laguna S 2.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | MiMo-V2.5-Pro speed / latency 61 tok/s / 6128ms input / output No data |
0 tests | Laguna S 2.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A |
Weighted outcome: Laguna S 2.1. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Output
| Features | Text inputText outputTool callingReasoning | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
|---|
input / output
No data
MiMo-V2.5-Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
AI发财网0 tests | Laguna S 2.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | MiMo-V2.5-Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
Astrdark0 tests | Laguna S 2.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | MiMo-V2.5-Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
Cuz AI0 tests | Laguna S 2.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | MiMo-V2.5-Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
