Data points: 66
The readout for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 Coder, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
MiniMax M2.5
MiniMax M2.5 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 4 to 2.
Evidence depth
66 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 7 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with MiniMax M2.5
The charts below split 7 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Model compare MiniMax M2.5 vs Qwen3 Coderminimax-m2-5-vs-qwen3-coder | Model A MiniMax M2.5 | Model B Qwen3 Coder |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Verified metric wins | 4 wins | 2 wins |
| Where it leads | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
| Metric | MiniMax M2.5 | Qwen3 Coder |
|---|---|---|
| No shared benchmark metrics are available yet. | ||
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | MiniMax M2.5 | Qwen3 Coder |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | MiniMax M2.5 | Qwen3 Coder |
|---|---|---|
5 tests | MiniMax M2.5 speed / latency 40 tok/s / 11007ms input / output No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for MiniMax M2.5 and Qwen3 Coder: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | MiniMax M2.5 | Qwen3 Coder |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | MiniMax M2.5 MiniMax M2.5 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests. | Qwen3 Coder Qwen3 Coder is stronger when you prioritize Average speed, First-token latency. |
TL;DR: MiniMax M2.5 leads across 66 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from MiniMax M2.5 vs Qwen3 Coder into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
| Average speed, First-token latency |
| Model metadata | MiniMax M2.5 exposes 204.8K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs. | Qwen3 Coder exposes 1.0M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling. |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | No data | No data |
| Context window | 204.8K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Max output | 196.6K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Jul 2025 |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | Input Text Output Text |
| Features | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputText outputTool calling |
| Parameters | No data | 480B / 35B active |
| Tokenizer | Other | Qwen3 |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | 2025-06-30 |
| OpenRouter ID | minimax/minimax-m2.5 | qwen/qwen3-coder:free |
| References | No data | No data |
Qwen3 Coder
speed / latency
N/A / N/A
input / output
No data
RinkoAI5 tests | MiniMax M2.5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Qwen3 Coder speed / latency 552 tok/s / 886ms input / output No data |
|---|
素墨API5 tests | MiniMax M2.5 minimaxai/minimax-m2.5 speed / latency 19 tok/s / 19888ms input / output $0.010/M / $0.010/M | Qwen3 Coder qwen3-coder-nx speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.010/M / $0.010/M |
|---|
6345ywz API0 tests | MiniMax M2.5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Qwen3 Coder speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
6i2 API0 tests | MiniMax M2.5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Qwen3 Coder speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
MiniMax M2.5 minimax/minimax-m2.5:free speed / latency No data input / output $0.0050/M / $0.0050/M | Qwen3 Coder qwen/qwen3-coder:free speed / latency No data input / output $0.0050/M / $0.0050/M |
MiniMax M2.5 minimax-m2.5 speed / latency No data input / output $0.010/M / $0.010/M | Qwen3 Coder qwen3-coder speed / latency No data input / output $0.010/M / $0.010/M |
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
