Data points: 36
Model compare
The readout for Qwen3 Embedding and Voyage 4, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: Qwen3 Embedding. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
Qwen3 Embedding
Qwen3 Embedding has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 83.3 to 16.7.
Evidence depth
36 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 2 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Qwen3 Embedding
The charts below split 2 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Qwen3 Embedding and Voyage 4: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | Qwen3 Embedding | Voyage 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 83.3 pts | 16.7 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 0 categories | 0 categories |
| Operational advantages | Cheapest input price, Provider coverage | No data |
| Context window | No data | 32K tokens |
| Max output | No data | No data |
| Modalities | No data | Input Text Output embeddings |
| Features |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | Qwen3 Embedding | Voyage 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | No data | VoyageAI by MongoDB |
| Released | No data | Jul 2026 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | No data | Other |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | No data | voyageai/voyage-4 |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Qwen3 Embedding and Voyage 4: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
Qwen3 Embedding
Qwen3 Embedding has these operational advantages: Cheapest input price, Provider coverage.
Voyage 4
Voyage 4 does not clearly lead in the benchmark or operational dimensions shared by both models.
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
No shared professional benchmark scores are available yet.
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Qwen3 Embedding | Voyage 4 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Qwen3 Embedding | Voyage 4 |
|---|---|---|
0 tests | Qwen3 Embedding Qwen3-Embedding-8B speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $16.00/M/$16.00/M | Voyage 4 voyage-4 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $16.00/M/$16.00/M |
0 tests | Qwen3 Embedding speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Voyage 4 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Weighted outcome: Qwen3 Embedding. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
| None listed |
Text inputEmbeddings output |
