Anthropic
·Released on Jun 9, 2026Claude Fable 5 API Benchmarks, Pricing & Provider Data
Compare Claude Fable 5 with another model
Choose a model to open its comparison page.
LLM
Claude Fable 5 benchmark, API pricing, and provider data cover 509 API providers, with prices starting at $0.0030/request. Claude Fable 5 free API options are available from 4 providers. The page also shows measured API speed and first-token latency.
Anthropic Claude Fable 5 is a Mythos-class frontier model for the most demanding reasoning and long-horizon agentic work, with a 1M-token context window, adaptive thinking, and strong vision capabilit...
Quality
#3of 111
80.0
LMSpeed score
Speed
#58of 80
61char/s
3.92 s
Cost
#174of 185
$0.0030/ 1M · 8:1 in:out
$0.0005 in · $0.0025 out
Category Performance
Observed-capability estimates with uncertainty reported separately from independent benchmark families.
- Coverage
- 6 / 8
- Methodology
- V3.0
#1Coding66.1RatedGlobal rank #34/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 59.3–73.0
code generation63.1
scicode · scicode
repository engineering71.8
swe_pro · swe_pro
debugging testing72.6
swe_verified · swe_verified
tooling quality57.2
terminalbench · aa_terminal_bench21 / terminalbench · benchlm_coding_terminal_bench2 / terminalbench · terminal_bench_hard
#2Knowledge64.8Provisional1/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 50.8–78.7
broad knowledge64.8
aa_omniscience · aa_omniscience_index / benchlm_category_knowledge · benchlm_category_knowledge
professional knowledgePrior only
factualityPrior only
retrieval open bookPrior only
#3Agents62.9RatedGlobal rank #73/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 54.7–71.1
planningPrior only
tool use56.6
tau · aa_tau3_banking / tau · tau2_bench
environment execution69.3
enterprise_ops_gym · aa_enterprise_ops_gym / gdpval_aa · benchlm_agentic_gdpval_aa / osworld · os_world_verified / terminalbench · benchlm_agentic_terminal_bench2
recovery reliability62.8
briefcase · aa_briefcase_elo / harvey_lab · aa_harvey_lab
#4Reasoning60.2Estimated2/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 49.4–71.0
abstract logicPrior only
scientific causal64.4
critpt · critpt / gpqa · gpqa / hle · hle
multistep constraintsPrior only
evidence verification56
lcr · lcr
#5Instruction following50.3Provisional1/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 34.3–66.3
constraint followingPrior only
structured outputPrior only
novel instruction generalization50.3
ifbench · aa_if_bench
long multiturn instructionPrior only
#6Multimodal45Provisional1/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 28.6–61.4
perception ocrPrior only
document spatialPrior only
visual reasoning45
benchlm_category_multimodal · benchlm_category_multimodal_grounded
video actionPrior only
No data:MathMultilingual
Specifications
Input and output token limits for this model, plus how it ranks on long-context understanding.
INPUT
1Mtokens
≈ 1.2K pages of text
OUTPUT
128Ktokens
8K128K1M4M
1M
Features
Rankings
Excels at
It's decent at
Falls behind in
Detailed scores
Updated: Sep 8, 2026Overall
undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
Overall score80.0#3 / 111
Overall
undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Speed & latency
undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
Output speed65.9 tok/s#58 / 80Time to first token63.82 s#78 / 80
Speed & latency
undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Time to first token
LMSpeed rank#78
Score63.82 s
Sourceartificialanalysis.ai
UpdatedSep 5, 2026
Confidence4
Pricing
undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
Input price$10.00/M#174 / 185Output price$50.00/M#175 / 185
Pricing
undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Agents
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Rated
Score62.9#780% interval54.7–71.13/4 Measured dimensionsAgentic score89.1#3 / 76Terminal-Bench 2.084.3#5 / 53
Agents
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Rated
Dimensions and evidence
Planning & decompositionPrior only
Tool use56.6
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
tau · aa_tau3_banking · z -0.13 · q 1.00
tau · tau2_bench · z 1.27 · q 1.00
Environment & long-horizon execution69.3
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
enterprise_ops_gym · aa_enterprise_ops_gym · z 1.00 · q 1.00
gdpval_aa · benchlm_agentic_gdpval_aa · z 1.35 · q 1.00
osworld · os_world_verified · z 1.34 · q 1.00
terminalbench · benchlm_agentic_terminal_bench2 · z 1.64 · q 1.00
Recovery & completion reliability62.8
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
briefcase · aa_briefcase_elo · z 0.50 · q 1.00
harvey_lab · aa_harvey_lab · z 0.73 · q 1.00
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Coding
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Rated
Score66.1#380% interval59.3–73.04/4 Measured dimensionsSciCode61.0%#1 / 37Coding score89.7#3 / 86
Coding
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Rated
Dimensions and evidence
Code generation63.1
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
scicode · scicode · z 1.59 · q 1.00
Repository engineering71.8
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
swe_pro · swe_pro · z 3.00 · q 1.00
Debugging & testing72.6
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
swe_verified · swe_verified · z 3.00 · q 1.00
Tool-assisted development & quality57.2
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
terminalbench · aa_terminal_bench21 · z 0.02 · q 1.00
terminalbench · benchlm_coding_terminal_bench2 · z 1.24 · q 1.00
terminalbench · terminal_bench_hard · z 0.88 · q 1.00
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1V3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#11
Score84.6
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedSep 8, 2026
Confidence3
Reasoning
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Estimated
Score60.280% interval49.4–71.02/4 Measured dimensionsGPQA92.6%#16 / 217HLE55.5%#4 / 214
Reasoning
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Estimated
Dimensions and evidence
Abstract logicPrior only
Scientific & causal reasoning64.4
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
critpt · critpt · z 0.97 · q 1.00
gpqa · gpqa · z 1.19 · q 1.00
hle · hle · z 1.30 · q 1.00
Multi-step constraintsPrior only
Evidence integration & verification56
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
lcr · lcr · z 0.36 · q 1.00
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Knowledge
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Provisional
Score64.880% interval50.8–78.71/4 Measured dimensionsKnowledge score87.2#4 / 82Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index62.1#4 / 117
Knowledge
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Provisional
Dimensions and evidence
Broad knowledge64.8
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
aa_omniscience · aa_omniscience_index · z 1.58 · q 1.00
benchlm_category_knowledge · benchlm_category_knowledge · z 1.03 · q 1.00
Professional knowledgePrior only
FactualityPrior only
Retrieval & open-book usePrior only
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#4
Score62.1
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedSep 8, 2026
Confidence3
AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate
LMSpeed rank#62
Score63.6
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedSep 8, 2026
Confidence3
Math
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · No data
No data80% interval30.8–69.20/4 Measured dimensions
Math
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · No data
Dimensions and evidence
Foundational mathPrior only
Competition mathPrior only
Advanced proofsPrior only
Applied & tool-assisted mathPrior only
Multilingual
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · No data
No data80% interval30.8–69.20/4 Measured dimensions
Multilingual
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · No data
Dimensions and evidence
Cross-language understandingPrior only
Multilingual generationPrior only
Reasoning transferPrior only
Low-resource robustnessPrior only
Multimodal
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Provisional
Score4580% interval28.6–61.41/4 Measured dimensionsMultimodal Grounded score62.5#37 / 55Blueprint-Bench 238.6#1 / 2
Multimodal
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Provisional
Dimensions and evidence
Perception & OCRPrior only
Document & spatial understandingPrior only
Visual reasoning45
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
benchlm_category_multimodal · benchlm_category_multimodal_grounded · z -0.34 · q 1.00
Video & grounded actionPrior only
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Multimodal Grounded scoreV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#37
Score62.5
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedSep 8, 2026
Confidence3
Instruction following
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Provisional
Score50.380% interval34.3–66.31/4 Measured dimensionsAA-IFBench63.5#47 / 84Instruction Following score78.3#39 / 51
Instruction following
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Provisional
Dimensions and evidence
Constraint followingPrior only
Structured outputPrior only
Novel-instruction generalization50.3
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
ifbench · aa_if_bench · z -0.23 · q 1.00
Multi-turn & long instructionsPrior only
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
OpenRouter endpoints
6 endpointsThird-party OpenRouter endpoint data, shown separately from LMSpeed measurements. Some 30-minute live performance fields only appear after syncing with an OpenRouter API key.
| Provider endpoint | Input | Output | 1d uptime | 30m latency | 30m throughput | Context / output |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Claude Platform on AWS claude-on-aws | $10/M | $50/M | 100.0% | — | — | undefined tokens / undefined tokens |
Anthropic anthropic | $10/M | $50/M | 99.8% | — | — | undefined tokens / undefined tokens |
Azure azure | $10/M | $50/M | 99.4% | — | — | undefined tokens / undefined tokens |
Google google-vertex/global | $10/M | $50/M | 99.0% | — | — | undefined tokens / undefined tokens |
Amazon Bedrock amazon-bedrock | $10/M | $50/M | — | — | — | undefined tokens / undefined tokens |
Google google-vertex/europe | $11/M | $55/M | — | — | — | undefined tokens / undefined tokens |
Pricing Comparison
Compare Claude Fable 5 API pricing across 505 providers. Prices range from $0.0030/request to $6000.00/M. Crond offers the lowest rate at $0.0030/request. 4 providers offer free API credits or a free tier.
| Provider | Health | Model Variant | Group | Input ($/M) | Output ($/M) | Speed (t/s) | First token | Audit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L1 71% | claude-fable-5 | 懒人 | -95%$0.500/M Cache read$0.100/M | -100%$0.050/M | 134.2 t/s+104% | 1.88 s-97% | ||
L1 99% | claude-fable-5 | default | $75.00/M Cache read$7.50/M | $375.00/M | 45.6 t/s | 3.69 s-94% | ||
L1 100% | claude-fable-5 | Claude-Kiro限时特价(只能用最新模型） | $100.00/M Cache read$10.00/MCache write$125.00/MCache write 1h$200.00/M | $500.00/M | 45.2 t/s | 3.08 s-95% | — | |
L1 100% | claude-fable-5 | cc-3 | -99%$0.137/M Cache read$0.014/MCache write$0.171/MCache write 1h$0.274/M | -99%$0.685/M | 39.2 t/s | 3.11 s-95% | ||
L1 100% | claude-fable-5 | default | -93%$0.685/M Cache read$0.068/M | -93%$3.42/M | — | — | — | |
L1 99% | claude-fable-5 | cc | -64%$3.57/M Cache read$0.357/M | -64%$17.86/M | — | — | — | |
L1 100% | claude-fable-5 | Corp Max | -97%$0.279/M Cache read$0.028/MCache write$0.349/MCache write 1h$0.558/M | -97%$1.40/M | — | — | — | |
L1 100% | claude-fable-5 | claude_kiro | -65%$3.50/M | -65%$17.50/M | — | — | — | |
L1 100% | claude-fable-5 | CC-KIRO | -97%$0.304/M Cache read$0.030/MCache write$0.304/MCache write 1h$0.487/M | -97%$1.52/M | — | — | ||
L1 100% | claude-fable-5-thinking | default | -86%$1.37/M | -86%$6.85/M | — | — | — | |
L1 100% | claude-fable-5 | default | -86%$1.37/M | -86%$6.85/M | — | — | — | |
L1 100% | claude-fable-5 | default | -23%$7.67/M | -23%$38.36/M | — | — | — | |
兔子API Free | L1 100% | claude-fable-5 | Claude-Code | Free | Free | — | — | — |
L1 100% | claude-fable-5 | claude-huaqiangbei | -95%$0.500/M Cache read$0.050/M | -95%$2.50/M | — | — | — | |
L1 100% | claude-fable-5 | default | -86%$1.37/M Cache read$0.137/M | -86%$6.85/M | — | — | — | |
L1 100% | claude-fable-5 | claude-MAX1-企业版 | -82%$1.85/M | -82%$9.23/M | — | — | — | |
L1 100% | claude-fable-5 | claude-kiro(满缓存) | -65%$3.50/M Cache read$0.350/MCache write$4.38/MCache write 1h$7.00/M | -65%$17.50/M | — | — | — | |
L1 100% | claude-fable-5 | aws | -62%$3.81/M Cache read$0.381/M | -62%$19.04/M | — | — | — | |
L1 100% | claude-fable-5 | ccmax | -62%$3.84/M Cache read$0.384/MCache write$4.79/MCache write 1h$7.67/M | -62%$19.18/M | — | — | — | |
L1 100% | claude-fable-5 | CLAUDE-KIRO反代🐢-x0.5-对话 | -50%$5.00/M Cache read$0.500/MCache write$6.25/M | -50%$25.00/M | — | — | — |
Showing 20 model IDs of 116.
Alternatives & Similar Models
GPT-5.4
gpt-5-4
OpenAI GPT-5.4 extends the GPT-5 family with stronger instruction following, deeper tool use, and improved performance on coding, math, and long-document analysis.
143 shared providers
Claude Opus 4.6
claude-opus-4-6
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.6 is the most capable Claude Opus tier, optimized for complex analysis, long-horizon coding, and high-stakes enterprise reasoning workloads.
143 shared providers
Claude Opus 4.7
claude-opus-4-7
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7 targets frontier-level analysis, complex coding, and autonomous workflows that require deep multi-step reasoning.
142 shared providers
Claude Sonnet 4.6
claude-sonnet-4-6
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 extends the Sonnet line with improved tool use, coding reliability, and long-context performance for everyday production workloads.
139 shared providers
Claude Opus 4.8
claude-opus-4-8
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 is Anthropic frontier model for complex reasoning, long-horizon agentic coding, and professional knowledge work, with a 1M-token context window and adaptive thinking support.
139 shared providers
Claude Haiku 4.5
claude-haiku-4-5
Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.5 delivers fast, low-cost responses while retaining solid instruction following for chat, classification, and lightweight coding.
136 shared providers
Frequently Asked Questions
- What benchmark data does Claude Fable 5 include?
- LMSpeed shows Claude Fable 5 benchmark context, API price, output speed, first-token latency, and provider data across 509 providers when those signals are available.
- What is the Claude Fable 5 API price?
- Claude Fable 5 has pricing from 509 providers, ranging from $0.0030/request to $6000.00/M. Crond has the lowest listed price.
- What does the Claude Fable 5 API pricing table include?
- The Claude Fable 5 API pricing table compares 509 providers by input price, output price, free tier status, speed, first-token latency, and recent health data when available.
- Which provider has the cheapest Claude Fable 5 API pricing?
- Crond currently has the lowest listed Claude Fable 5 price at $0.0030/request across 509 providers.
- Can I compare Claude Fable 5 API price and speed together?
- Yes. LMSpeed shows Claude Fable 5 API price, output speed, first-token latency, and provider health on the same page so you can compare cost and performance together.
- Is Claude Fable 5 API free?
- Yes, Claude Fable 5 free API options are available through 4 providerundefined other undefined} on LMSpeed, including 兔子API, Dext API, 兔子API, 兔子API. These providers offer free API credits or a free tier with no per-token charges.
- Where can I get Claude Fable 5 free API access?
- LMSpeed currently lists 4 free API providerundefined other undefined} for Claude Fable 5: 兔子API, Dext API, 兔子API, 兔子API. Check each provider row before using it because free tier limits can change.