Anthropic
·Released on Nov 24, 2025Claude Opus 4.5 API Benchmarks, Pricing & Provider Data
Compare Claude Opus 4.5 with another model
Choose a model to open its comparison page.
LLM
Claude Opus 4.5 benchmark, API pricing, and provider data cover undefined API provider} other undefined API providers}}, with prices starting at $0.0097/M. Claude Opus 4.5 free API options are available from undefined provider} other undefined providers}}. The page also shows measured API speed and first-token latency.
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.5 is the flagship Claude model for the hardest reasoning, research, and multi-step agent tasks where accuracy matters more than speed.
Quality
#75of 112
53.0
LMSpeed score
Speed
54char/s
3.12 s
Cost
#168of 186
$0.0097/ 1M · 8:1 in:out
$0.0016 in · $0.0082 out
Category Performance
Observed-capability estimates with uncertainty reported separately from independent benchmark families.
- Coverage
- 8 / 8
- Methodology
- V3.0
#1Reasoning60.5RatedGlobal rank #53/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 52.3–68.6
abstract logicPrior only
scientific causal53.1
critpt · critpt / gpqa · gpqa / hle · hle
multistep constraints61.7
mmlu_pro · mmlu_pro
evidence verification66.7
ai_needle · ai_needle / lcr · lcr / longbench · long_bench_v2
#2Knowledge57.6Estimated2/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 45.9–69.2
broad knowledge65.7
c_eval · c_eval / mmlu_redux · mmlu_redux
professional knowledge49.4
supergpqa · super_gpqa
factualityPrior only
retrieval open bookPrior only
#3Coding54RatedGlobal rank #193/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 45.9–62.1
code generation56.4
livecodebench · live_code_bench_v6 / livecodebench · livecodebench / scicode · aa_sci_code
repository engineering48.3
nl2repo · nl2_repo / swe_pro · swe_pro
debugging testing57.4
swe_multilingual · benchlm_coding_swe_multilingual / swe_verified · swe_verified
tooling qualityPrior only
#4Multilingual51.7Estimated2/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 39.5–63.9
cross language understanding45.3
nova · nova63
multilingual generationPrior only
reasoning transfer58.1
mmlu_prox · mmlu_pro_x
low resource robustnessPrior only
#5Math49.7Estimated3/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 40.7–58.8
foundational mathPrior only
competition math46.5
aime · aime2026 / hmmt · hmmt_feb2025 / hmmt · hmmt_feb2026 / hmmt · hmmt_nov2025
proof frontier49.9
frontiermath · frontier_math_v2_tier4 / frontiermath · frontier_math_v2_tiers13
applied tool math52.8
mmanswer · mm_answer_bench
#6Agents47.4RatedGlobal rank #444/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 42.0–52.7
planning57.9
deep_planning · gert_labs
tool use41.6
mcp_atlas · mcp_atlas / mcp_tasks · mcp_tasks / tau · tau2_bench / tau · tau3_bench / toolathlon · toolathlon
environment execution46.2
osworld · os_world_verified / terminalbench · benchlm_agentic_terminal_bench2 / vita_bench · vita_bench / wide_research · wide_research
recovery reliability43.8
claw_eval · claw_eval / cyber_gym · cyber_gym / jobbench · job_bench
#7Instruction following45.7Estimated2/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 33.8–57.6
constraint following47.1
ifeval · ifeval
structured outputPrior only
novel instruction generalization44.4
ifbench · aa_if_bench
long multiturn instructionPrior only
#8Multimodal31.9RatedGlobal rank #104/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 25.5–38.4
perception ocr29.4
v_star · v_star
document spatial39.2
charxiv · charxiv
visual reasoning26.3
mathvision · math_vision / mmmu_pro · mmmu_pro
video action32.8
screenspot · screen_spot_pro / video_mmmu · video_mmmu
Specifications
Input and output token limits for this model, plus how it ranks on long-context understanding.
INPUT
200Ktokens
≈ 240 pages of text
OUTPUT
64Ktokens
8K128K1M4M
200K
Features
Rankings
Excels at
It's decent at
Falls behind in
Detailed scores
Updated: Sep 13, 2026Overall
undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
Overall score53.0#75 / 112
Overall
undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Pricing
undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
Input price$5.00/M#168 / 186Output price$25.00/M#169 / 186
Pricing
undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Agents
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Rated
Score47.4#4480% interval42.0–52.74/4 Measured dimensionsAgentic score47.3#58 / 77Terminal-Bench 2.059.3#33 / 53
Agents
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Rated
Dimensions and evidence
Planning & decomposition57.9
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
deep_planning · gert_labs · z 1.07 · q 1.00
Tool use41.6
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
mcp_atlas · mcp_atlas · z -2.44 · q 1.00
mcp_tasks · mcp_tasks · z 0.00 · q 0.63
tau · tau2_bench · z 0.01 · q 1.00
tau · tau3_bench · z 0.00 · q 1.00
toolathlon · toolathlon · z -0.46 · q 1.00
Environment & long-horizon execution46.2
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
osworld · os_world_verified · z -0.59 · q 1.00
terminalbench · benchlm_agentic_terminal_bench2 · z -0.28 · q 1.00
vita_bench · vita_bench · z -0.64 · q 1.00
wide_research · wide_research · z 0.43 · q 1.00
Recovery & completion reliability43.8
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
claw_eval · claw_eval · z 0.00 · q 1.00
cyber_gym · cyber_gym · z -2.23 · q 1.00
jobbench · job_bench · z -0.06 · q 1.00
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Coding
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Rated
Score54#1980% interval45.9–62.13/4 Measured dimensionsLiveCodeBench73.8%#24 / 115Coding score50.2#56 / 87
Coding
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Rated
Dimensions and evidence
Code generation56.4
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
livecodebench · live_code_bench_v6 · z -0.38 · q 0.75
livecodebench · livecodebench · z 1.29 · q 1.00
scicode · aa_sci_code · z 0.37 · q 1.00
Repository engineering48.3
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
nl2repo · nl2_repo · z 0.02 · q 1.00
swe_pro · swe_pro · z 0.00 · q 1.00
Debugging & testing57.4
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
swe_multilingual · benchlm_coding_swe_multilingual · z 0.34 · q 1.00
swe_verified · swe_verified · z 0.87 · q 1.00
Tool-assisted development & qualityPrior only
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
LiveCodeBenchV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#24
Score73.8%
Sourceartificialanalysis.ai
UpdatedSep 13, 2026
Confidence4
Reasoning
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Rated
Score60.5#580% interval52.3–68.63/4 Measured dimensionsMMLU-Pro88.9%#4 / 129GPQA81.0%#96 / 218
Reasoning
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Rated
Dimensions and evidence
Abstract logicPrior only
Scientific & causal reasoning53.1
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
critpt · critpt · z -0.71 · q 1.00
gpqa · gpqa · z 0.57 · q 1.00
hle · hle · z 0.58 · q 1.00
Multi-step constraints61.7
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
mmlu_pro · mmlu_pro · z 1.35 · q 1.00
Evidence integration & verification66.7
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
ai_needle · ai_needle · z 2.61 · q 0.50
lcr · lcr · z -0.17 · q 1.00
longbench · long_bench_v2 · z 1.78 · q 1.00
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
MMLU-ProV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#4
Score88.9%
Sourceartificialanalysis.ai
UpdatedSep 13, 2026
Confidence4
Knowledge
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Estimated
Score57.680% interval45.9–69.22/4 Measured dimensionsKnowledge score59.6#58 / 83SuperGPQA70.6#7 / 16
Knowledge
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Estimated
Dimensions and evidence
Broad knowledge65.7
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
c_eval · c_eval · z 0.00 · q 0.63
mmlu_redux · mmlu_redux · z 3.00 · q 0.75
Professional knowledge49.4
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
supergpqa · super_gpqa · z 0.18 · q 1.00
FactualityPrior only
Retrieval & open-book usePrior only
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
LMSpeed rank#71
Score23.7
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedSep 13, 2026
Confidence4
AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate
LMSpeed rank#48
Score76.2
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedSep 13, 2026
Confidence4
Math
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Estimated
Score49.780% interval40.7–58.83/4 Measured dimensionsMath score58.3#30 / 63AIME2695.1#9 / 14
Math
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Estimated
Dimensions and evidence
Foundational mathPrior only
Competition math46.5
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
aime · aime2026 · z -0.18 · q 1.00
hmmt · hmmt_feb2025 · z -0.80 · q 0.88
hmmt · hmmt_feb2026 · z -0.30 · q 1.00
hmmt · hmmt_nov2025 · z 0.00 · q 1.00
Advanced proofs49.9
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
frontiermath · frontier_math_v2_tier4 · z -0.22 · q 1.00
frontiermath · frontier_math_v2_tiers13 · z -0.11 · q 1.00
Applied & tool-assisted math52.8
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
mmanswer · mm_answer_bench · z 0.42 · q 1.00
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)V3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#29
Score20.7
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedSep 13, 2026
Confidence4
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)V3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#24
Score4.2
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedSep 13, 2026
Confidence4
Multilingual
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Estimated
Score51.780% interval39.5–63.92/4 Measured dimensionsMultilingual score82.9#2 / 11MMLU-ProX85.7#2 / 11
Multilingual
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Estimated
Dimensions and evidence
Cross-language understanding45.3
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
nova · nova63 · z -0.63 · q 0.88
Multilingual generationPrior only
Reasoning transfer58.1
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
mmlu_prox · mmlu_pro_x · z 1.28 · q 1.00
Low-resource robustnessPrior only
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Multimodal
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Rated
Score31.9#1080% interval25.5–38.44/4 Measured dimensionsMultimodal Grounded score23.5#55 / 56MMMU-Pro70.6#29 / 31
Multimodal
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Rated
Dimensions and evidence
Perception & OCR29.4
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
v_star · v_star · z -3.00 · q 1.00
Document & spatial understanding39.2
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
charxiv · charxiv · z -1.29 · q 1.00
Visual reasoning26.3
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
mathvision · math_vision · z -3.00 · q 1.00
mmmu_pro · mmmu_pro · z -1.72 · q 1.00
Video & grounded action32.8
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
screenspot · screen_spot_pro · z -2.79 · q 1.00
video_mmmu · video_mmmu · z -0.17 · q 1.00
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Instruction following
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Estimated
Score45.780% interval33.8–57.62/4 Measured dimensionsInstruction Following score39.5#51 / 52IFEval90.9#12 / 16
Instruction following
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Estimated
Dimensions and evidence
Constraint following47.1
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
ifeval · ifeval · z -0.59 · q 1.00
Structured outputPrior only
Novel-instruction generalization44.4
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
ifbench · aa_if_bench · z -1.04 · q 1.00
Multi-turn & long instructionsPrior only
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
OpenRouter endpoints
6 endpointsThird-party OpenRouter endpoint data, shown separately from LMSpeed measurements. Some 30-minute live performance fields only appear after syncing with an OpenRouter API key.
| Provider endpoint | Input | Output | 1d uptime | 30m latency | 30m throughput | Context / output |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Azure azure/global | $5/M | $25/M | 100% | — | — | undefined tokens / undefined tokens |
Google google-vertex/global | $5/M | $25/M | 100% | — | — | undefined tokens / undefined tokens |
Amazon Bedrock amazon-bedrock/eu-west-1 | $5.50/M | $27.50/M | 100% | — | — | undefined tokens / undefined tokens |
Amazon Bedrock amazon-bedrock | $5/M | $25/M | 100.0% | — | — | undefined tokens / undefined tokens |
Anthropic anthropic | $5/M | $25/M | 99.8% | — | — | undefined tokens / undefined tokens |
Claude Platform on AWS claude-on-aws | $5/M | $25/M | 99.7% | — | — | undefined tokens / undefined tokens |
Pricing Comparison
Compare Claude Opus 4.5 API pricing across 444 providers. Prices range from $0.0097/M to $225.00/request. Omini Api offers the lowest rate at $0.0097/M. 8 providers offer free API credits or a free tier.
Showing 20 model IDs of 121.
Alternatives & Similar Models
Claude Opus 4.6
claude-opus-4-6
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.6 is the most capable Claude Opus tier, optimized for complex analysis, long-horizon coding, and high-stakes enterprise reasoning workloads.
209 shared providers
Claude Sonnet 4.6
claude-sonnet-4-6
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 extends the Sonnet line with improved tool use, coding reliability, and long-context performance for everyday production workloads.
206 shared providers
Claude Sonnet 4.5
claude-sonnet-4-5
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.5 balances strong reasoning, coding, and agent capabilities with lower latency and cost than Opus, making it a practical default for production assistants.
206 shared providers
Claude Haiku 4.5
claude-haiku-4-5
Anthropic Claude Haiku 4.5 delivers fast, low-cost responses while retaining solid instruction following for chat, classification, and lightweight coding.
205 shared providers
GPT-5.4
gpt-5-4
OpenAI GPT-5.4 extends the GPT-5 family with stronger instruction following, deeper tool use, and improved performance on coding, math, and long-document analysis.
203 shared providers
Claude Opus 4.7
claude-opus-4-7
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7 targets frontier-level analysis, complex coding, and autonomous workflows that require deep multi-step reasoning.
188 shared providers
Frequently Asked Questions
- What benchmark data does Claude Opus 4.5 include?
- LMSpeed shows Claude Opus 4.5 benchmark context, API price, output speed, first-token latency, and provider data across 452 providers when those signals are available.
- What is the Claude Opus 4.5 API price?
- Claude Opus 4.5 has pricing from undefined provider} other undefined providers}}, ranging from $0.0097/M to $225.00/request. Omini Api has the lowest listed price.
- What does the Claude Opus 4.5 API pricing table include?
- The Claude Opus 4.5 API pricing table compares 452 providers by input price, output price, free tier status, speed, first-token latency, and recent health data when available.
- Which provider has the cheapest Claude Opus 4.5 API pricing?
- Omini Api currently has the lowest listed Claude Opus 4.5 price at $0.0097/M across undefined provider} other undefined providers}}.
- Can I compare Claude Opus 4.5 API price and speed together?
- Yes. LMSpeed shows Claude Opus 4.5 API price, output speed, first-token latency, and provider health on the same page so you can compare cost and performance together.
- Is Claude Opus 4.5 API free?
- Yes, Claude Opus 4.5 free API options are available through 8 providerundefined other undefined} on LMSpeed, including 兔子API, 兔子API, 兔子API, 兔子API, 兔子API. These providers offer free API credits or a free tier with no per-token charges.
- Where can I get Claude Opus 4.5 free API access?
- LMSpeed currently lists 8 free API providerundefined other undefined} for Claude Opus 4.5: 兔子API, 兔子API, 兔子API, 兔子API, 兔子API. Check each provider row before using it because free tier limits can change.