Anthropic
·Released on May 12, 2026

Claude Opus 4.7 API Benchmarks, Pricing & Provider Data

Compare Claude Opus 4.7 with another model

Choose a model to open its comparison page.

Share on X
LLM

Claude Opus 4.7 benchmark, API pricing, and provider data cover 787 API providers, with prices starting at $0.0010/M. Claude Opus 4.7 free API options are available from 7 providers. The page also shows measured API speed and first-token latency.

Anthropic Claude Opus 4.7 targets frontier-level analysis, complex coding, and autonomous workflows that require deep multi-step reasoning.

Quality
#28of 102
66.0
LMSpeed score
Speed
47char/s
4.89 s
Cost
#167of 184
$0.0010/ 1M · 8:1 in:out
$0.0002 in · $0.0009 out

Category Performance

Observed-capability estimates with uncertainty reported separately from independent benchmark families.

Coverage
6 / 8
Methodology
V3.0
Category PerformanceObserved-capability estimates with uncertainty reported separately from independent benchmark families.Agents54.3Coding59.7Reasoning55.7Knowledge54.3Math56.8Multilingual-Multimodal-Instruction following44.5
#1Coding59.7Estimated2/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 48.570.9
code generation58.6
scicode · scicode
repository engineering60.8
react_native_bench · react_native_evals / vibecode · vibe_code_bench
debugging testingPrior only
tooling qualityPrior only
#2Math56.8Provisional1/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 40.772.8
foundational mathPrior only
competition mathPrior only
proof frontier56.8
frontiermath · frontier_math_v2_tier4 / frontiermath · frontier_math_v2_tiers13
applied tool mathPrior only
#3Reasoning55.7Estimated2/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 45.066.5
abstract logicPrior only
scientific causal57.8
critpt · critpt / gpqa · gpqa / hle · hle
multistep constraintsPrior only
evidence verification53.7
lcr · lcr
#4Agents54.3RatedGlobal rank #234/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 47.461.2
planning58.6
deep_planning · gert_labs
tool use47.7
tau · tau2_bench
environment execution51.6
osworld · os_world2
recovery reliability59.4
researchclaw · research_claw_bench
#4Knowledge54.3Provisional1/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 40.368.3
broad knowledge54.3
aa_omniscience · aa_omniscience_index / benchlm_category_knowledge · benchlm_category_knowledge
professional knowledgePrior only
factualityPrior only
retrieval open bookPrior only
#6Instruction following44.5Provisional1/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 28.560.5
constraint followingPrior only
structured outputPrior only
novel instruction generalization44.5
ifbench · aa_if_bench
long multiturn instructionPrior only
No data:MultilingualMultimodal

Specifications

Input and output token limits for this model, plus how it ranks on long-context understanding.

INPUT
1Mtokens
1.2K pages of text
OUTPUT
128Ktokens
8K128K1M4M
1M

Features

Technical Details

Input
Output
Released
May 2026
Documentation
Tokenizer
Claude
Architecture
text+image+file->text
Moderated
Yes
Supported parameters
include_reasoningmax_completion_tokensmax_tokensreasoningreasoning_effortresponse_formatstopstructured_outputstool_choicetoolsverbosity

Rankings

Excels at

It's decent at

Falls behind in

Detailed scores

Updated: Sep 4, 2026

Overall

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}

Overall score66.0#28 / 102
Overall score
LMSpeed rank#28
Score66.0
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence1

Pricing

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}

Input price$5.00/M#167 / 184Output price$25.00/M#168 / 184
Input price
LMSpeed rank#167
Score$5.00/M
UpdatedSep 4, 2026
Confidence4
Output price
LMSpeed rank#168
Score$25.00/M
UpdatedSep 4, 2026
Confidence4

Agents

V3.0

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Rated

Score54.3#2380% interval47.4–61.24/4 Measured dimensionsΤ²-bench results74.0#59 / 82Gert Labs65.6#3 / 49
Dimensions and evidence
Planning & decomposition58.6
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
deep_planning · gert_labs · z 1.17 · q 1.00
Tool use47.7
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
tau · tau2_bench · z -0.42 · q 1.00
Environment & long-horizon execution51.6
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
osworld · os_world2 · z -0.26 · q 1.00
Recovery & completion reliability59.4
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
researchclaw · research_claw_bench · z 0.79 · q 1.00
Τ²-bench resultsV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#59
Score74.0
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence1
Gert LabsV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#3
Score65.6
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence1
ResearchClawBenchV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#2
Score20.7
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence1
OSWorld 2.0V3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#11
Score13.9
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence1
Agentic score
LMSpeed rank#25
Score70.4
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence1

Coding

V3.0

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Estimated

Score59.780% interval48.5–70.92/4 Measured dimensionsSciCode54.5%#14 / 209Vibe Code Bench71.0#1 / 33
Dimensions and evidence
Code generation58.6
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
scicode · scicode · z 1.02 · q 1.00
Repository engineering60.8
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
react_native_bench · react_native_evals · z 0.61 · q 1.00
vibecode · vibe_code_bench · z 1.56 · q 1.00
Debugging & testingPrior only
Tool-assisted development & qualityPrior only
SciCodeV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#14
Score54.5%
UpdatedSep 4, 2026
Confidence4
Vibe Code BenchV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#1
Score71.0
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence1
React Native EvalsV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#4
Score82.8
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence1
AA-SciCodeV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#29
Score50.1
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence1
FrontierCode 1.1 Main
LMSpeed rank#7
Score38.5
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence1
Coding score
LMSpeed rank#14
Score63.3
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence1

Reasoning

V3.0

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Estimated

Score55.780% interval45.0–66.52/4 Measured dimensionsGPQA91.4%#22 / 216HLE42.3%#24 / 213
Dimensions and evidence
Abstract logicPrior only
Scientific & causal reasoning57.8
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
critpt · critpt · z 0.25 · q 1.00
gpqa · gpqa · z 0.76 · q 1.00
hle · hle · z 0.74 · q 1.00
Multi-step constraintsPrior only
Evidence integration & verification53.7
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
lcr · lcr · z 0.13 · q 1.00
GPQAV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#22
Score91.4%
UpdatedSep 4, 2026
Confidence4
HLEV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#24
Score42.3%
UpdatedSep 4, 2026
Confidence4
AA-LCRV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#45
Score72.3
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence1
CritPtV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#43
Score5.1
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence1

Knowledge

V3.0

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Provisional

Score54.380% interval40.3–68.31/4 Measured dimensionsArtificial Analysis Intelligence Index43.9#29 / 112AA-GPQA Diamond88.5#40 / 109
Dimensions and evidence
Broad knowledge54.3
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
aa_omniscience · aa_omniscience_index · z 0.63 · q 1.00
benchlm_category_knowledge · benchlm_category_knowledge · z -0.07 · q 1.00
Professional knowledgePrior only
FactualityPrior only
Retrieval & open-book usePrior only
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#29
Score43.9
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence1
AA-GPQA Diamond
LMSpeed rank#40
Score88.5
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence1
AA-HLE
LMSpeed rank#38
Score33.3
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence1
AA-Omniscience IndexV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#20
Score14.8
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence1
AA-Omniscience Accuracy
LMSpeed rank#24
Score44.7
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence1
AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate
LMSpeed rank#69
Score54.1
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence1
Knowledge scoreV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#39
Score65.5
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence1

Math

V3.0

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Provisional

Score56.880% interval40.7–72.81/4 Measured dimensionsMath score61.7#27 / 62FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)43.8#9 / 47
Dimensions and evidence
Foundational mathPrior only
Competition mathPrior only
Advanced proofs56.8
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
frontiermath · frontier_math_v2_tier4 · z 0.85 · q 1.00
frontiermath · frontier_math_v2_tiers13 · z 0.52 · q 1.00
Applied & tool-assisted mathPrior only
Math score
LMSpeed rank#27
Score61.7
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence1
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)V3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#9
Score43.8
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence1
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)V3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#9
Score22.9
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence1

Multilingual

V3.0

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · No data

No data80% interval30.8–69.20/4 Measured dimensions
Dimensions and evidence
Cross-language understandingPrior only
Multilingual generationPrior only
Reasoning transferPrior only
Low-resource robustnessPrior only

Multimodal

V3.0

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · No data

80% interval30.8–69.20/4 Measured dimensionsAA-MMMU-Pro76.4#26 / 65Design Arena Website1307.0#11 / 76
Dimensions and evidence
Perception & OCRPrior only
Document & spatial understandingPrior only
Visual reasoningPrior only
Video & grounded actionPrior only
AA-MMMU-Pro
LMSpeed rank#26
Score76.4
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence1
Design Arena Website
LMSpeed rank#11
Score1307.0
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence1

Instruction following

V3.0

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Provisional

Score44.580% interval28.5–60.51/4 Measured dimensionsAA-IFBench43.6#61 / 84
Dimensions and evidence
Constraint followingPrior only
Structured outputPrior only
Novel-instruction generalization44.5
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
ifbench · aa_if_bench · z -1.01 · q 1.00
Multi-turn & long instructionsPrior only
AA-IFBenchV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#61
Score43.6
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence1

OpenRouter endpoints

8 endpoints

Third-party OpenRouter endpoint data, shown separately from LMSpeed measurements. Some 30-minute live performance fields only appear after syncing with an OpenRouter API key.

Provider endpointInputOutput1d uptime30m latency30m throughputContext / output
Claude Platform on AWS
claude-on-aws
$5/M$25/M100.0%undefined tokens / undefined tokens
Amazon Bedrock
amazon-bedrock/global
$5/M$25/M100.0%undefined tokens / undefined tokens
Google
google-vertex/global
$5/M$25/M99.9%undefined tokens / undefined tokens
Anthropic
anthropic
$5/M$25/M99.8%undefined tokens / undefined tokens
Azure
azure/global
$5/M$25/Mundefined tokens / undefined tokens
Google
google-vertex/us
$5.50/M$27.50/Mundefined tokens / undefined tokens
Amazon Bedrock
amazon-bedrock/eu-west-1
$5.50/M$27.50/Mundefined tokens / undefined tokens
Google
google-vertex/europe
$5.50/M$27.50/Mundefined tokens / undefined tokens

Pricing Comparison

Compare Claude Opus 4.7 API pricing across 780 providers. Prices range from $0.0010/M to $49950.00/M. 钠 API offers the lowest rate at $0.0010/M. 7 providers offer free API credits or a free tier.

ProviderHealthModel VariantGroupInput ($/M)Output ($/M)Speed (t/s)First tokenAudit
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-7
default
-93%$0.342/M
Cache read$0.034/M
-93%$1.71/M
162.4 t/s
1.91 s
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-7
Chat
-93%$0.342/M
Cache read$0.034/MCache write$0.171/MCache write 1h$0.274/M
-93%$1.71/M
59.0 t/s
2.72 s
L1
100%
L2
0%
claude-opus-4-7
Claude_AG
-98%$0.096/M
Cache read$0.0096/M
-98%$0.479/M
54.6 t/s
2.78 s
L1
48%
claude-opus-4-7
default
$5.00/M
Cache read$0.500/MCache write$6.25/MCache write 1h$10.00/M
$25.00/M
52.3 t/s
3.59 s
L1
99%
claude-opus-4-7
aws-q
-96%$0.214/M
Cache read$0.021/M
-96%$1.07/M
45.9 t/s
2.21 s
L1
99%
claude-opus-4-7
Claude-Entry
-94%$0.300/M
Cache read$0.030/MCache write$0.375/MCache write 1h$0.600/M
-94%$1.50/M
42.9 t/s
2.78 s
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-7
Claude特惠
-90%$0.500/M
Cache read$0.050/MCache write$0.625/MCache write 1h$1.00/M
-90%$2.50/M
42.0 t/s
4.41 s
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-7
Claude_AG
-98%$0.096/M
Cache read$0.0096/M
-98%$0.479/M
35.4 t/s
2.75 s
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-7
default
$7.88/M
Cache read$0.788/MCache write$7.88/MCache write 1h$12.60/M
$39.38/M
32.2 t/s
13.01 s
L1
58%
claude-opus-4-7
逆向
-95%$0.240/M
Cache read$0.024/MCache write$0.300/MCache write 1h$0.479/M
-95%$1.20/M
18.9 t/s
28.79 s
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-7-xhigh
claude_kiro
-65%$1.75/M
-65%$8.75/M
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-7-medium
claude_kiro
-65%$1.75/M
-65%$8.75/M
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-7-low
claude_kiro
-65%$1.75/M
-65%$8.75/M
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-7-high
claude_kiro
-65%$1.75/M
-65%$8.75/M
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-7
claude_kiro
-65%$1.75/M
-65%$8.75/M
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-7-minimal
claude_cc
-20%$4.00/M
-20%$20.00/M
L1
99%
claude-opus-4-7
aws
-99%$0.059/M
Cache read$0.0059/MCache write$0.073/MCache write 1h$0.117/M
-99%$0.294/M
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-7
default
$0.068/request
-
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-7
default
-86%$0.685/M
Cache read$0.068/MCache write$0.856/MCache write 1h$1.37/M
-86%$3.42/M
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-7
CC-KIRO
-97%$0.152/M
Cache read$0.015/MCache write$0.190/MCache write 1h$0.304/M
-97%$0.761/M
Showing 20 model IDs of 170.

Alternatives & Similar Models

Frequently Asked Questions

What benchmark data does Claude Opus 4.7 include?
LMSpeed shows Claude Opus 4.7 benchmark context, API price, output speed, first-token latency, and provider data across 787 providers when those signals are available.
What is the Claude Opus 4.7 API price?
Claude Opus 4.7 has pricing from 787 providers, ranging from $0.0010/M to $49950.00/M. 钠 API has the lowest listed price.
What does the Claude Opus 4.7 API pricing table include?
The Claude Opus 4.7 API pricing table compares 787 providers by input price, output price, free tier status, speed, first-token latency, and recent health data when available.
Which provider has the cheapest Claude Opus 4.7 API pricing?
钠 API currently has the lowest listed Claude Opus 4.7 price at $0.0010/M across 787 providers.
Can I compare Claude Opus 4.7 API price and speed together?
Yes. LMSpeed shows Claude Opus 4.7 API price, output speed, first-token latency, and provider health on the same page so you can compare cost and performance together.
Is Claude Opus 4.7 API free?
Yes, Claude Opus 4.7 free API options are available through 7 providerundefined other undefined} on LMSpeed, including 兔子API, 兔子API, 我不是AI神, 我不是AI神, Moyanjdc API. These providers offer free API credits or a free tier with no per-token charges.
Where can I get Claude Opus 4.7 free API access?
LMSpeed currently lists 7 free API providerundefined other undefined} for Claude Opus 4.7: 兔子API, 兔子API, 我不是AI神, 我不是AI神, Moyanjdc API. Check each provider row before using it because free tier limits can change.

Also known as

3h15pm/claude-opus-4.7AWS/claude-opus-4-7Notion/claude-opus-4-7[L]c/claude-opus-4-7[hm]q|aws测/claude-opus-4-7

Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.Standard benchmark data may include BenchLM and other public sources.

Build with LMSpeed Data

Free

Free public API for LLM pricing, benchmarks & provider data

  • Real-time pricing & availability
  • Speed & latency benchmarks
  • 300+ models, 600+ providers
  • 1,000 requests/day
View API Documentation