Anthropic
·Released on May 27, 2026

Claude Opus 4.8 API Benchmarks, Pricing & Provider Data

Compare Claude Opus 4.8 with another model

Choose a model to open its comparison page.

Share on X
LLM

Claude Opus 4.8 benchmark, API pricing, and provider data cover 795 API providers, with prices starting at $0.0010/M. Claude Opus 4.8 free API options are available from 6 providers. The page also shows measured API speed and first-token latency.

Anthropic Claude Opus 4.8 is Anthropic frontier model for complex reasoning, long-horizon agentic coding, and professional knowledge work, with a 1M-token context window and adaptive thinking support.

Quality
#8of 100
76.0
LMSpeed score
Speed
193char/s
2.96 s
Cost
#165of 181
$0.0010/ 1M · 8:1 in:out
$0.0002 in · $0.0009 out

Category Performance

Observed-capability estimates with uncertainty reported separately from independent benchmark families.

Coverage
8 / 8
Methodology
V3.0
Category PerformanceObserved-capability estimates with uncertainty reported separately from independent benchmark families.Agents62.6Coding65.2Reasoning56.4Knowledge63.7Math58Multilingual55Multimodal59.6Instruction following49.9
#1Coding65.2RatedGlobal rank #34/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 58.671.8
code generation61.5
scicode · scicode
repository engineering67.6
swe_pro · swe_pro
debugging testing78.5
swe_multilingual · benchlm_coding_swe_multilingual / swe_verified · swe_verified
tooling quality53.2
terminalbench · benchlm_coding_terminal_bench2
#2Knowledge63.7Provisional1/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 49.777.7
broad knowledge63.7
aa_omniscience · aa_omniscience_index / benchlm_category_knowledge · benchlm_category_knowledge
professional knowledgePrior only
factualityPrior only
retrieval open bookPrior only
#3Agents62.6RatedGlobal rank #74/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 57.168.1
planning63.1
deep_planning · gert_labs
tool use63.3
mcp_atlas · mcp_atlas / tau · tau2_bench / toolathlon · toolathlon
environment execution62.9
browsecomp · browse_comp / deep_search_qa · deep_search_qa / gdpval_aa · benchlm_agentic_gdpval_aa / osworld · os_world2 / osworld · os_world_verified / terminalbench · benchlm_agentic_terminal_bench2
recovery reliability61.1
harvey_lab · aa_harvey_lab / researchclaw · research_claw_bench
#4Multimodal59.6Estimated2/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 47.671.6
perception ocrPrior only
document spatial58.9
charxiv · charxiv
visual reasoningPrior only
video action60.3
screenspot · screen_spot_pro
#5Math58Provisional1/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 41.974.0
foundational mathPrior only
competition mathPrior only
proof frontier58
frontiermath · frontier_math_v2_tier4 / frontiermath · frontier_math_v2_tiers13
applied tool mathPrior only
#6Reasoning56.4RatedGlobal rank #133/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 47.765.2
abstract logic51.3
arc_agi · arc_agi2
scientific causal63.8
critpt · critpt / gpqa · gpqa / hle · hle / hle · hle_no_tools
multistep constraintsPrior only
evidence verification54.2
lcr · lcr
#7Multilingual55Provisional1/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 37.972.2
cross language understanding55
include · include
multilingual generationPrior only
reasoning transferPrior only
low resource robustnessPrior only
#8Instruction following49.9Provisional1/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 33.965.9
constraint followingPrior only
structured outputPrior only
novel instruction generalization49.9
ifbench · aa_if_bench
long multiturn instructionPrior only

Specifications

Input and output token limits for this model, plus how it ranks on long-context understanding.

INPUT
1Mtokens
1.2K pages of text
OUTPUT
128Ktokens
8K128K1M4M
1M

Features

Technical Details

Input
Output
Released
May 2026
Documentation
Tokenizer
Claude
Architecture
text+image+file->text
Moderated
Yes
Supported parameters
include_reasoningmax_completion_tokensmax_tokensreasoningreasoning_effortresponse_formatstopstructured_outputstemperaturetool_choicetoolsverbosity

Rankings

Excels at

It's decent at

Falls behind in

Detailed scores

Updated: Sep 1, 2026

Overall

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}

Overall score76.0#8 / 100Factuality hallucination rate3.4#1 / 4
Overall score
LMSpeed rank#8
Score76.0
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
Factuality hallucination rate
LMSpeed rank#1
Score3.4
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence3
HackerBench harmful compliance
LMSpeed rank#3
Score22.8
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence3

Pricing

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}

Input price$5.00/M#165 / 181Output price$25.00/M#166 / 181
Input price
LMSpeed rank#165
Score$5.00/M
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence4
Output price
LMSpeed rank#166
Score$25.00/M
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence4

Agents

V3.0

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Rated

Score62.6#780% interval57.1–68.14/4 Measured dimensionsAgentic score82.8#16 / 69Terminal-Bench 2.074.6#14 / 53
Dimensions and evidence
Planning & decomposition63.1
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
deep_planning · gert_labs · z 1.75 · q 1.00
Tool use63.3
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
mcp_atlas · mcp_atlas · z 0.92 · q 1.00
tau · tau2_bench · z 0.55 · q 1.00
toolathlon · toolathlon · z 1.22 · q 1.00
Environment & long-horizon execution62.9
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
browsecomp · browse_comp · z 0.37 · q 1.00
deep_search_qa · deep_search_qa · z 0.98 · q 1.00
gdpval_aa · benchlm_agentic_gdpval_aa · z 1.24 · q 1.00
osworld · os_world2 · z 0.10 · q 1.00
osworld · os_world_verified · z 1.12 · q 1.00
terminalbench · benchlm_agentic_terminal_bench2 · z 0.75 · q 1.00
Recovery & completion reliability61.1
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
harvey_lab · aa_harvey_lab · z 0.09 · q 1.00
researchclaw · research_claw_bench · z 0.90 · q 1.00
Agentic score
LMSpeed rank#16
Score82.8
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
Terminal-Bench 2.0V3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#14
Score74.6
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
BrowseCompV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#9
Score84.3
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
DeepSearchQAV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#3
Score93.1
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
OSWorld-VerifiedV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#4
Score83.4
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
Finance Agent v2
LMSpeed rank#3
Score53.9
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
GDPval-AAV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#9
Score1593.0
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
MCP AtlasV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#5
Score82.2
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
ToolathlonV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#2
Score59.9
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
Gert LabsV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#1
Score73.0
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
AA Agentic Index
LMSpeed rank#10
Score49.4
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
Τ²-bench resultsV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#23
Score94.4
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
GDPval-AA
LMSpeed rank#9
Score53.9
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
ResearchClawBenchV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#1
Score21.1
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
OSWorld 2.0V3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#6
Score20.6
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
AA Harvey LABV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#6
Score91.1
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
Terminal-Bench 3.0
LMSpeed rank#5
Score21.1
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
AA AutomationBench
LMSpeed rank#7
Score48.5
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence3

Coding

V3.0

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Rated

Score65.2#380% interval58.6–71.84/4 Measured dimensionsSciCode53.5%#16 / 206Coding score68.8#4 / 81
Dimensions and evidence
Code generation61.5
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
scicode · scicode · z 1.41 · q 1.00
Repository engineering67.6
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
swe_pro · swe_pro · z 2.41 · q 1.00
Debugging & testing78.5
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
swe_multilingual · benchlm_coding_swe_multilingual · z 2.42 · q 1.00
swe_verified · swe_verified · z 3.00 · q 1.00
Tool-assisted development & quality53.2
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
terminalbench · benchlm_coding_terminal_bench2 · z 0.44 · q 1.00
SciCodeV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#16
Score53.5%
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence4
Coding score
LMSpeed rank#4
Score68.8
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
SWE-bench VerifiedV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#3
Score88.6
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
SWE-bench ProV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#3
Score69.2
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
SWE MultilingualV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#2
Score84.4
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
SWE Multimodal
LMSpeed rank#2
Score38.4
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
Terminal-Bench 2.0V3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#11
Score74.6
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
CursorBench v3.1
LMSpeed rank#3
Score58.4
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
AA Coding Index
LMSpeed rank#9
Score74.3
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
AA-SciCodeV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#18
Score53.5
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
CursorBench v3.2
LMSpeed rank#7
Score62.3
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
FrontierCode 1.1 Main
LMSpeed rank#3
Score46.5
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
APEX-SWE
LMSpeed rank#7
Score43.9
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence3
EEBench
LMSpeed rank#3
Score51.4
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence3
3DCodeBench
LMSpeed rank#3
Score47.0
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence3
CADGenBench Generation
LMSpeed rank#6
Score27.4
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence3
SpaceXAI MTS Eval
LMSpeed rank#3
Score55.8
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence3
InferenceEval
LMSpeed rank#4
Score40.7
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence3
KernelBench Internal
LMSpeed rank#4
Score67.6
UpdatedAug 20, 2026
Confidence3

Reasoning

V3.0

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Rated

Score56.4#1380% interval47.7–65.23/4 Measured dimensionsGPQA92.0%#17 / 213HLE48.7%#6 / 210
Dimensions and evidence
Abstract logic51.3
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
arc_agi · arc_agi2 · z -0.00 · q 1.00
Scientific & causal reasoning63.8
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
critpt · critpt · z 0.91 · q 1.00
gpqa · gpqa · z 1.18 · q 1.00
hle · hle · z 1.17 · q 1.00
hle · hle_no_tools · z 0.89 · q 1.00
Multi-step constraintsPrior only
Evidence integration & verification54.2
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
lcr · lcr · z 0.20 · q 1.00
GPQAV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#17
Score92.0%
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence4
HLEV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#6
Score48.7%
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence4
AA-LCRV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#39
Score73.0
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
CritPtV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#10
Score20.9
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
Reasoning score
LMSpeed rank#16
Score68.3
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
ARC-AGI-2V3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#10
Score72.1
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
ARC-AGI-3
LMSpeed rank#3
Score1.5
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3

Knowledge

V3.0

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Provisional

Score63.780% interval49.7–77.71/4 Measured dimensionsKnowledge score86.8#4 / 69GPQA-D93.6#4 / 31
Dimensions and evidence
Broad knowledge63.7
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
aa_omniscience · aa_omniscience_index · z 1.11 · q 1.00
benchlm_category_knowledge · benchlm_category_knowledge · z 1.29 · q 1.00
Professional knowledgePrior only
FactualityPrior only
Retrieval & open-book usePrior only
Knowledge scoreV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#4
Score86.8
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
GPQA-D
LMSpeed rank#4
Score93.6
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
HLE w/o tools
LMSpeed rank#3
Score49.8
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#7
Score57.3
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
AA-GPQA Diamond
LMSpeed rank#17
Score92.0
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
AA-HLE
LMSpeed rank#4
Score48.7
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
AA-Omniscience IndexV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#5
Score28.8
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
AA-Omniscience Accuracy
LMSpeed rank#16
Score48.8
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate
LMSpeed rank#85
Score39.3
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3

Math

V3.0

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Provisional

Score5880% interval41.9–74.01/4 Measured dimensionsUSAMO 202696.7#1 / 2Math score66.8#22 / 62
Dimensions and evidence
Foundational mathPrior only
Competition mathPrior only
Advanced proofs58
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
frontiermath · frontier_math_v2_tier4 · z 1.09 · q 1.00
frontiermath · frontier_math_v2_tiers13 · z 0.60 · q 1.00
Applied & tool-assisted mathPrior only
USAMO 2026
LMSpeed rank#1
Score96.7
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
Math score
LMSpeed rank#22
Score66.8
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)V3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#8
Score47.2
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)V3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#7
Score31.3
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3

Multilingual

V3.0

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Provisional

Score5580% interval37.9–72.21/4 Measured dimensionsINCLUDE87.6#2 / 4
Dimensions and evidence
Cross-language understanding55
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
include · include · z 0.35 · q 0.33
Multilingual generationPrior only
Reasoning transferPrior only
Low-resource robustnessPrior only
INCLUDEV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#2
Score87.6
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3

Multimodal

V3.0

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Estimated

Score59.680% interval47.6–71.62/4 Measured dimensionsMultimodal Grounded score85.4#5 / 44OfficeQA Pro66.2#2 / 9
Dimensions and evidence
Perception & OCRPrior only
Document & spatial understanding58.9
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
charxiv · charxiv · z 1.31 · q 1.00
Visual reasoningPrior only
Video & grounded action60.3
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
screenspot · screen_spot_pro · z 1.08 · q 1.00
Multimodal Grounded score
LMSpeed rank#5
Score85.4
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
OfficeQA Pro
LMSpeed rank#2
Score66.2
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
ScreenSpot ProV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#1
Score87.9
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
CharXivV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#5
Score89.9
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
CharXiv w/o tools
LMSpeed rank#6
Score80.5
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
Design Arena Website
LMSpeed rank#28
Score1272.0
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3

Instruction following

V3.0

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Provisional

Score49.980% interval33.9–65.91/4 Measured dimensionsAA-IFBench62.2#49 / 84
Dimensions and evidence
Constraint followingPrior only
Structured outputPrior only
Novel-instruction generalization49.9
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
ifbench · aa_if_bench · z -0.28 · q 1.00
Multi-turn & long instructionsPrior only
AA-IFBenchV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#49
Score62.2
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3

OpenRouter endpoints

10 endpoints

Third-party OpenRouter endpoint data, shown separately from LMSpeed measurements. Some 30-minute live performance fields only appear after syncing with an OpenRouter API key.

Provider endpointInputOutput1d uptime30m latency30m throughputContext / output
Amazon Bedrock
amazon-bedrock/eu-west-1
$5.50/M$27.50/M100%undefined tokens / undefined tokens
Google
google-vertex/global
$5/M$25/M100.0%undefined tokens / undefined tokens
Claude Platform on AWS
claude-on-aws
$5/M$25/M100.0%undefined tokens / undefined tokens
Amazon Bedrock
amazon-bedrock
$5/M$25/M99.9%undefined tokens / undefined tokens
Anthropic
anthropic
$5/M$25/M99.5%undefined tokens / undefined tokens
Azure
azure/us
$5/M$25/M89.7%undefined tokens / undefined tokens
Azure
azure/global
$5/M$25/M86.3%undefined tokens / undefined tokens
Google
google-vertex/us
$5.50/M$27.50/Mundefined tokens / undefined tokens
Google
google-vertex/europe
$5.50/M$27.50/Mundefined tokens / undefined tokens
Amazon Bedrock
amazon-bedrock/us
$5.50/M$27.50/Mundefined tokens / undefined tokens

Pricing Comparison

Compare Claude Opus 4.8 API pricing across 789 providers. Prices range from $0.0010/M to $49950.00/M. 钠 API offers the lowest rate at $0.0010/M. 6 providers offer free API credits or a free tier.

ProviderHealthModel VariantGroupInput ($/M)Output ($/M)Speed (t/s)First tokenAudit
L1
99%
claude-opus-4-8
aws
-99%$0.059/M
Cache read$0.0059/MCache write$0.073/MCache write 1h$0.117/M
-99%$0.294/M
50.5 t/s
4.82 s
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-8
claude--kiro
-86%$0.685/M
Cache read$0.068/MCache write$0.856/MCache write 1h$1.37/M
-86%$3.42/M
46.6 t/s
3.31 s
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-8-thinking
claude--kiro
-86%$0.685/M
Cache read$0.068/MCache write$0.856/MCache write 1h$1.37/M
-86%$3.42/M
L1
99%
claude-opus-4-8
Claude-Entry
-94%$0.300/M
Cache read$0.030/M
-94%$1.50/M
46.4 t/s
2.54 s
L1
99%
claude-opus-4-8
default
-20%$4.00/M
Cache read$0.400/MCache write$5.00/MCache write 1h$8.00/M
-20%$20.00/M
45.6 t/s
2.08 s
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-8
aws-q
-96%$0.214/M
Cache read$0.021/M
-96%$1.07/M
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-8
default
-93%$0.342/M
Cache read$0.034/M
-93%$1.71/M
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-8-thinking
claude_kiro
-65%$1.75/M
-65%$8.75/M
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-8-max
claude_kiro
-65%$1.75/M
-65%$8.75/M
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-8-medium
claude_kiro
-65%$1.75/M
-65%$8.75/M
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-8-xhigh
claude_kiro
-65%$1.75/M
-65%$8.75/M
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-8
claude_kiro
-65%$1.75/M
-65%$8.75/M
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-8-high
claude_kiro
-65%$1.75/M
-65%$8.75/M
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-8-low
claude_kiro
-65%$1.75/M
-65%$8.75/M
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-8
default
$0.068/request
-
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-8-thinking
default
-86%$0.685/M
-86%$3.42/M
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-8
default
-86%$0.685/M
Cache read$0.068/M
-86%$3.42/M
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-8
default
$5.00/M
Cache read$0.500/MCache write$6.25/MCache write 1h$10.00/M
$25.00/M
L1
100%
claude-opus-4-8
原价分组
Free
Free
L1
100%
熊猫-特供-按量-满血逆-claude-opus-4-8
default
-100%$0.015/M
Cache read$0.0015/MCache write$0.019/MCache write 1h$0.030/M
-100%$0.076/M
Showing 20 model IDs of 167.

Alternatives & Similar Models

Frequently Asked Questions

What benchmark data does Claude Opus 4.8 include?
LMSpeed shows Claude Opus 4.8 benchmark context, API price, output speed, first-token latency, and provider data across 795 providers when those signals are available.
What is the Claude Opus 4.8 API price?
Claude Opus 4.8 has pricing from 795 providers, ranging from $0.0010/M to $49950.00/M. 钠 API has the lowest listed price.
What does the Claude Opus 4.8 API pricing table include?
The Claude Opus 4.8 API pricing table compares 795 providers by input price, output price, free tier status, speed, first-token latency, and recent health data when available.
Which provider has the cheapest Claude Opus 4.8 API pricing?
钠 API currently has the lowest listed Claude Opus 4.8 price at $0.0010/M across 795 providers.
Can I compare Claude Opus 4.8 API price and speed together?
Yes. LMSpeed shows Claude Opus 4.8 API price, output speed, first-token latency, and provider health on the same page so you can compare cost and performance together.
Is Claude Opus 4.8 API free?
Yes, Claude Opus 4.8 free API options are available through 6 providerundefined other undefined} on LMSpeed, including 兔子API, 我不是AI神, 我不是AI神, 兔子API, 兔子API. These providers offer free API credits or a free tier with no per-token charges.
Where can I get Claude Opus 4.8 free API access?
LMSpeed currently lists 6 free API providerundefined other undefined} for Claude Opus 4.8: 兔子API, 我不是AI神, 我不是AI神, 兔子API, 兔子API. Check each provider row before using it because free tier limits can change.

Also known as

26479061/claude-opus-4.83h15pm/claude-opus-4.8Claude-Opus-4.8[L]c/claude-opus-4-8[hm]q|aws测/claude-opus-4-8

Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.Standard benchmark data may include BenchLM and other public sources.

Build with LMSpeed Data

Free

Free public API for LLM pricing, benchmarks & provider data

  • Real-time pricing & availability
  • Speed & latency benchmarks
  • 300+ models, 600+ providers
  • 1,000 requests/day
View API Documentation