Anthropic
·Released on Jun 30, 2026

Claude Sonnet 5 API Benchmarks, Pricing & Provider Data

Compare Claude Sonnet 5 with another model

Choose a model to open its comparison page.

Share on X
LLM

Claude Sonnet 5 benchmark, API pricing, and provider data cover 616 API providers, with prices starting at $0.0030/request. Claude Sonnet 5 free API options are available from 5 providers. The page also shows measured API speed and first-token latency.

Sonnet 5 is Anthropic's most capable Sonnet-class model, with frontier performance across coding, agents, and professional work. It supports adaptive thinking with selectable reasoning effort levels (...

Quality
#11of 100
75.0
LMSpeed score
Speed
#41of 73
166char/s
6.01 s
Cost
#138of 179
$0.0030/ 1M · 8:1 in:out
$0.0005 in · $0.0025 out

Category Performance

Observed-capability estimates with uncertainty reported separately from independent benchmark families.

Coverage
5 / 8
Methodology
V3.0
Category PerformanceObserved-capability estimates with uncertainty reported separately from independent benchmark families.Agents64.2Coding59.6Reasoning56.3Knowledge61.3Math-Multilingual-Multimodal56.6Instruction following-
#1Agents64.2Provisional1/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 52.176.4
planningPrior only
tool usePrior only
environment execution64.2
browsecomp · browse_comp / gdpval_aa · benchlm_agentic_gdpval_aa / osworld · os_world_verified / terminalbench · benchlm_agentic_terminal_bench2
recovery reliabilityPrior only
#2Knowledge61.3Provisional1/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 47.375.3
broad knowledge61.3
aa_omniscience · aa_omniscience_index / benchlm_category_knowledge · benchlm_category_knowledge
professional knowledgePrior only
factualityPrior only
retrieval open bookPrior only
#3Coding59.6RatedGlobal rank #64/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 53.066.2
code generation58.1
scicode · scicode
repository engineering58.6
swe_pro · swe_pro
debugging testing65.1
swe_multilingual · benchlm_coding_swe_multilingual / swe_verified · swe_verified
tooling quality56.6
terminalbench · benchlm_coding_terminal_bench2
#4Multimodal56.6Provisional1/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 40.572.8
perception ocrPrior only
document spatial56.6
charxiv · charxiv
visual reasoningPrior only
video actionPrior only
#5Reasoning56.3Estimated2/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 45.567.1
abstract logicPrior only
scientific causal56.3
critpt · critpt / gpqa · gpqa / hle · hle / hle · hle_no_tools
multistep constraintsPrior only
evidence verification56.3
lcr · lcr
No data:MathMultilingualInstruction following

Specifications

Input and output token limits for this model, plus how it ranks on long-context understanding.

INPUT
1Mtokens
1.2K pages of text
OUTPUT
128Ktokens
8K128K1M4M
1M

Features

Technical Details

Input
Output
Released
Jun 2026
Documentation
Tokenizer
Claude
Architecture
text+image+file->text
Moderated
Yes
Supported parameters
include_reasoningmax_completion_tokensmax_tokensreasoningreasoning_effortresponse_formatstopstructured_outputstool_choicetoolsverbosity

Rankings

Excels at

It's decent at

Falls behind in

Detailed scores

Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Overall

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}

Overall score75.0#11 / 100
Overall score
LMSpeed rank#11
Score75.0
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2

Speed & latency

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}

Output speed83.8 tok/s#41 / 73Time to first token130.63 s#73 / 73
Output speed
LMSpeed rank#41
Score83.8 tok/s
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence4
Time to first token
LMSpeed rank#73
Score130.63 s
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence4

Pricing

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}

Input price$2.00/M#138 / 179Output price$10.00/M#137 / 179
Input price
LMSpeed rank#138
Score$2.00/M
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence4
Output price
LMSpeed rank#137
Score$10.00/M
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence4

Agents

V3.0

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Provisional

Score64.280% interval52.1–76.41/4 Measured dimensionsAgentic score87.0#5 / 69Terminal-Bench 2.080.4#9 / 53
Dimensions and evidence
Planning & decompositionPrior only
Tool usePrior only
Environment & long-horizon execution64.2
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
browsecomp · browse_comp · z 0.41 · q 1.00
gdpval_aa · benchlm_agentic_gdpval_aa · z 1.27 · q 1.00
osworld · os_world_verified · z 0.85 · q 1.00
terminalbench · benchlm_agentic_terminal_bench2 · z 1.24 · q 1.00
Recovery & completion reliabilityPrior only
Agentic score
LMSpeed rank#5
Score87.0
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
Terminal-Bench 2.0V3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#9
Score80.4
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
BrowseCompV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#7
Score84.7
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
OSWorld-VerifiedV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#6
Score81.2
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
GDPval-AAV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#8
Score1603.0
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
HLE w/ tools
LMSpeed rank#3
Score57.4
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
AA Agentic Index
LMSpeed rank#8
Score49.7
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
GDPval-AA
LMSpeed rank#8
Score54.9
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
AA AutomationBench
LMSpeed rank#13
Score39.2
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
Terminal-Bench 3.0
LMSpeed rank#9
Score14.6
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2

Coding

V3.0

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Rated

Score59.6#680% interval53.0–66.24/4 Measured dimensionsSciCode53.6%#14 / 204Coding score61.0#15 / 81
Dimensions and evidence
Code generation58.1
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
scicode · scicode · z 0.93 · q 1.00
Repository engineering58.6
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
swe_pro · swe_pro · z 1.20 · q 1.00
Debugging & testing65.1
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
swe_multilingual · benchlm_coding_swe_multilingual · z 0.78 · q 1.00
swe_verified · swe_verified · z 1.94 · q 1.00
Tool-assisted development & quality56.6
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
terminalbench · benchlm_coding_terminal_bench2 · z 0.88 · q 1.00
SciCodeV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#14
Score53.6%
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence4
Coding score
LMSpeed rank#15
Score61.0
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
SWE-bench ProV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#9
Score63.2
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
Terminal-Bench 2.0V3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#8
Score80.4
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
FrontierCode 1.1 Main
LMSpeed rank#6
Score42.7
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
SWE-bench VerifiedV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#5
Score85.2
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
SWE MultilingualV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#4
Score78.3
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
SWE Multimodal
LMSpeed rank#3
Score28.1
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
AA Coding Index
LMSpeed rank#14
Score71.5
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
AA-SciCodeV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#16
Score53.6
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
CursorBench v3.2
LMSpeed rank#8
Score61.5
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
APEX-SWE
LMSpeed rank#5
Score46.4
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
EEBench
LMSpeed rank#7
Score40.3
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
3DCodeBench
LMSpeed rank#5
Score39.2
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2

Reasoning

V3.0

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Estimated

Score56.380% interval45.5–67.12/4 Measured dimensionsGPQA91.1%#21 / 211HLE41.3%#23 / 208
Dimensions and evidence
Abstract logicPrior only
Scientific & causal reasoning56.3
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
critpt · critpt · z 0.80 · q 1.00
gpqa · gpqa · z 0.17 · q 1.00
hle · hle · z 0.25 · q 1.00
hle · hle_no_tools · z 0.19 · q 1.00
Multi-step constraintsPrior only
Evidence integration & verification56.3
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
lcr · lcr · z 0.49 · q 1.00
GPQAV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#21
Score91.1%
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence4
HLEV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#23
Score41.3%
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence4
AA-LCRV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#18
Score77.0
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
CritPtV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#18
Score16.9
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2

Knowledge

V3.0

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Provisional

Score61.380% interval47.3–75.31/4 Measured dimensionsKnowledge score85.9#5 / 69HLE w/o tools43.2#8 / 21
Dimensions and evidence
Broad knowledge61.3
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
aa_omniscience · aa_omniscience_index · z 0.69 · q 1.00
benchlm_category_knowledge · benchlm_category_knowledge · z 1.12 · q 1.00
Professional knowledgePrior only
FactualityPrior only
Retrieval & open-book usePrior only
Knowledge scoreV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#5
Score85.9
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
HLE w/o tools
LMSpeed rank#8
Score43.2
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
Artificial Analysis Intelligence IndexV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#12
Score55.3
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
AA-GPQA Diamond
LMSpeed rank#21
Score91.1
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
AA-HLE
LMSpeed rank#19
Score41.3
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
AA-Omniscience IndexV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#17
Score16.5
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
AA-Omniscience Accuracy
LMSpeed rank#31
Score40.1
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate
LMSpeed rank#84
Score39.4
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2

Math

V3.0

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · No data

No data80% interval30.8–69.20/4 Measured dimensions
Dimensions and evidence
Foundational mathPrior only
Competition mathPrior only
Advanced proofsPrior only
Applied & tool-assisted mathPrior only

Multilingual

V3.0

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · No data

No data80% interval30.8–69.20/4 Measured dimensions
Dimensions and evidence
Cross-language understandingPrior only
Multilingual generationPrior only
Reasoning transferPrior only
Low-resource robustnessPrior only

Multimodal

V3.0

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Provisional

Score56.680% interval40.5–72.81/4 Measured dimensionsMultimodal Grounded score76.1#12 / 44CharXiv88.3#8 / 29
Dimensions and evidence
Perception & OCRPrior only
Document & spatial understanding56.6
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
charxiv · charxiv · z 1.00 · q 1.00
Visual reasoningPrior only
Video & grounded actionPrior only
Multimodal Grounded score
LMSpeed rank#12
Score76.1
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
CharXivV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#8
Score88.3
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
CharXiv w/o tools
LMSpeed rank#9
Score77.0
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
AA-MMMU-Pro
LMSpeed rank#24
Score77.3
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2
Design Arena Website
LMSpeed rank#17
Score1286.0
UpdatedAug 19, 2026
Confidence2

Instruction following

V3.0

undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · No data

No data80% interval30.8–69.20/4 Measured dimensions
Dimensions and evidence
Constraint followingPrior only
Structured outputPrior only
Novel-instruction generalizationPrior only
Multi-turn & long instructionsPrior only

OpenRouter endpoints

9 endpoints

Third-party OpenRouter endpoint data, shown separately from LMSpeed measurements. Some 30-minute live performance fields only appear after syncing with an OpenRouter API key.

Provider endpointInputOutput1d uptime30m latency30m throughputContext / output
Amazon Bedrock
amazon-bedrock/us-east-1
$2.20/M$11/M100%undefined tokens / undefined tokens
Google
google-vertex/europe
$2.20/M$11/M100.0%undefined tokens / undefined tokens
Azure
azure/us
$2/M$10/M100.0%undefined tokens / undefined tokens
Anthropic
anthropic
$2/M$10/M100.0%undefined tokens / undefined tokens
Claude Platform on AWS
claude-on-aws
$2/M$10/M99.9%undefined tokens / undefined tokens
Google
google-vertex/global
$2/M$10/M99.9%undefined tokens / undefined tokens
Azure
azure/global
$2/M$10/M99.6%undefined tokens / undefined tokens
Amazon Bedrock
amazon-bedrock/global
$2/M$10/M97.9%undefined tokens / undefined tokens
Google
google-vertex/us
$2.20/M$11/Mundefined tokens / undefined tokens

Pricing Comparison

Compare Claude Sonnet 5 API pricing across 611 providers. Prices range from $0.0030/request to $2400.00/M. Crond offers the lowest rate at $0.0030/request. 5 providers offer free API credits or a free tier.

ProviderHealthModel VariantGroupInput ($/M)Output ($/M)Speed (t/s)First tokenAudit
L1
100%
claude-sonnet-5
aws-q
-96%$0.086/M
Cache read$0.0086/M
-96%$0.429/M
L1
100%
claude-sonnet-5
default
-93%$0.137/M
Cache read$0.014/M
-93%$0.685/M
L1
99%
claude-sonnet-5
claude_kiro
-65%$0.700/M
-65%$3.50/M
L1
99%
claude-sonnet-5
aws
-99%$0.023/M
Cache read$0.0023/MCache write$0.029/MCache write 1h$0.047/M
-99%$0.117/M
L1
100%
claude-sonnet-5
Claude-Entry
-94%$0.120/M
Cache read$0.012/M
-94%$0.600/M
L1
100%
claude-sonnet-5
Claude-hybrid
-79%$0.411/M
Cache read$0.041/MCache write$0.514/MCache write 1h$0.822/M
-79%$2.05/M
L1
100%
[按次特价]claude-sonnet-5
default
$0.0041/request
-
L1
100%
claude-sonnet-5
default
-79%$0.411/M
Cache read$0.041/MCache write$0.514/MCache write 1h$0.822/M
-79%$2.05/M
L1
100%
[代码克]claude-sonnet-5
default
-78%$0.444/M
Cache read$0.044/MCache write$0.555/MCache write 1h$0.888/M
-78%$2.22/M
L1
100%
claude-sonnet-5
default
$0.041/request
-
L1
100%
claude-sonnet-5
default
-86%$0.274/M
Cache read$0.027/M
-86%$1.37/M
L1
100%
claude-sonnet-5
claude-标准-个人版
-81%$0.387/M
-81%$1.94/M
L1
100%
claude-sonnet-5
ccmax
-62%$0.767/M
Cache read$0.077/MCache write$0.959/MCache write 1h$1.53/M
-62%$3.84/M
L1
100%
claude-sonnet-5
default
-51%$0.979/M
Cache read$0.098/MCache write$1.22/MCache write 1h$1.96/M
-51%$4.90/M
L1
100%
claude-sonnet-5
claude-kiro(满缓存)
-47%$1.05/M
Cache read$0.105/MCache write$1.31/MCache write 1h$2.10/M
-47%$5.25/M
L1
100%
claude-sonnet-5
default
$3.00/M
Cache read$0.300/MCache write$15.00/MCache write 1h$24.00/M
-70%$3.00/M
L1
100%
claude-sonnet-5
default
$2.00/M
Cache read$0.200/M
$10.00/M
L1
100%
claude-sonnet-5
官方优惠
Free
Free
L1
100%
claude-sonnet-5
cc-3
-99%$0.027/M
Cache read$0.0027/MCache write$0.034/MCache write 1h$0.055/M
-99%$0.137/M
L1
100%
按次-claude-sonnet-5
按次计费
$0.040/request
-
Showing 20 model IDs of 125.

Alternatives & Similar Models

Frequently Asked Questions

What benchmark data does Claude Sonnet 5 include?
LMSpeed shows Claude Sonnet 5 benchmark context, API price, output speed, first-token latency, and provider data across 616 providers when those signals are available.
What is the Claude Sonnet 5 API price?
Claude Sonnet 5 has pricing from 616 providers, ranging from $0.0030/request to $2400.00/M. Crond has the lowest listed price.
What does the Claude Sonnet 5 API pricing table include?
The Claude Sonnet 5 API pricing table compares 616 providers by input price, output price, free tier status, speed, first-token latency, and recent health data when available.
Which provider has the cheapest Claude Sonnet 5 API pricing?
Crond currently has the lowest listed Claude Sonnet 5 price at $0.0030/request across 616 providers.
Can I compare Claude Sonnet 5 API price and speed together?
Yes. LMSpeed shows Claude Sonnet 5 API price, output speed, first-token latency, and provider health on the same page so you can compare cost and performance together.
Is Claude Sonnet 5 API free?
Yes, Claude Sonnet 5 free API options are available through 5 providerundefined other undefined} on LMSpeed, including 我不是AI神, 兔子API, 兔子API, 兔子API, 我不是AI神. These providers offer free API credits or a free tier with no per-token charges.
Where can I get Claude Sonnet 5 free API access?
LMSpeed currently lists 5 free API providerundefined other undefined} for Claude Sonnet 5: 我不是AI神, 兔子API, 兔子API, 兔子API, 我不是AI神. Check each provider row before using it because free tier limits can change.

Also known as

Claude-Sonnet-5[hm]q|kiro/claude-sonnet-5[lq]q|CP/claude-sonnet-5[lq]q|CS/claude-sonnet-5[lq]q|Kiro/claude-sonnet-5

Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.Standard benchmark data may include BenchLM and other public sources.

Build with LMSpeed Data

Free

Free public API for LLM pricing, benchmarks & provider data

  • Real-time pricing & availability
  • Speed & latency benchmarks
  • 300+ models, 600+ providers
  • 1,000 requests/day
View API Documentation