Sponsored byFusecodeEnterprise coding API for Claude Code, Codex, and model workflows.
LogoLMSpeed
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Leaderboard
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
  1. Home
  2. Models
  3. Gemini 3.1 Pro
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Tools
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Audit
Company
  • About
Resources
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
  • Public API
  • Botab
  • VidBee
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Gemini
Google
·Released on Feb 19, 2026

Gemini 3.1 Pro API Benchmarks, Pricing & Provider Data

Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro with another model

Choose a model to open its comparison page.

X (Twitter)Share on X
LLM

Gemini 3.1 Pro benchmark, API pricing, and provider data cover 607 API providers, with prices starting at $0.0020/request. Gemini 3.1 Pro free API options are available from 8 providers. The page also shows measured API speed and first-token latency.

Google Gemini 3.1 Pro is a Gemini 3 series model with advanced multimodal reasoning, long-context support, and strong performance on coding and analytical tasks.

Quality
#9of 83
74.0
LMSpeed score
Speed
92char/s
15.36 s
Cost
$0.0020/ 1M · 8:1 in:out
$0.0003 in · $0.0017 out

Category Performance

Observed-capability estimates with uncertainty reported separately from independent benchmark families.

Coverage
8 / 8
Methodology
V3.0
Category PerformanceObserved-capability estimates with uncertainty reported separately from independent benchmark families.Agents47.9Coding56Reasoning59.8Knowledge57.8Math55.3Multilingual59.7Multimodal56Instruction following55.6
#1Reasoning59.8Rated·Global rank #4·3/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 51.0–68.5
abstract logic56.4
arc_agi · arc_agi2
scientific causal65.8
critpt · critpt / gpqa · aa_gpqa_diamond / hle · aa_hle / hle · hle_no_tools
multistep constraintsPrior only
evidence verification57.1
lcr · lcr
#2Multilingual59.7Provisional·1/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 42.5–77.0
cross language understanding59.7
global_mmlu · aa_global_mmlu_lite
multilingual generationPrior only
reasoning transferPrior only
low resource robustnessPrior only
#3Knowledge57.8Provisional·1/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 42.7–73.0
broad knowledgePrior only
professional knowledge57.8
healthbench · health_bench_hard / medxpert · med_xpert_qa_text
factualityPrior only
retrieval open bookPrior only
#4Coding56Rated·Global rank #15·3/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 47.3–64.7
code generation66
livecodebench · live_code_bench_pro / scicode · aa_sci_code
repository engineering51.9
react_native_bench · react_native_evals / vibecode · vibe_code_bench
debugging testingPrior only
tooling quality50.1
terminalbench · aa_terminal_bench21 / terminalbench · terminal_bench_hard
#4Multimodal56Rated·Global rank #2·4/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 49.3–62.7
perception ocr53.7
simplevqa · simple_vqa
document spatial48.3
charxiv · charxiv
visual reasoning65.6
erqa · erqa / medxpert · med_xpert_qa_mm / mmmu_pro · mmmu_pro
video action56.2
screenspot · screen_spot_pro
#6Instruction following55.6Provisional·1/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 39.6–71.6
constraint followingPrior only
structured outputPrior only
novel instruction generalization55.6
ifbench · aa_if_bench
long multiturn instructionPrior only
#7Math55.3Provisional·1/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 39.2–71.4
foundational mathPrior only
competition mathPrior only
proof frontier55.3
frontiermath · frontier_math_v2_tier4 / frontiermath · frontier_math_v2_tiers13
applied tool mathPrior only
#8Agents47.9Rated·Global rank #37·4/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 42.1–53.7
planning54.1
deep_planning · gert_labs
tool use46.1
tau · aa_tau3_banking / tau · tau2_bench
environment execution48.6
deep_search_qa · deep_search_qa / enterprise_ops_gym · aa_enterprise_ops_gym / gdpval_aa · benchlm_agentic_gdpval_aa / itbench · aa_itbench
recovery reliability42.7
apex_agents · apex_agents_aa / claw_eval · claw_eval / harvey_lab · aa_harvey_lab / researchclaw · research_claw_bench

Specifications

Input and output token limits for this model, plus how it ranks on long-context understanding.

INPUT
1.0Mtokens
≈ 1.3K pages of text
OUTPUT
65.5Ktokens
8K128K1M4M
1.0M

Features

Technical Details

Input

Rankings

Excels at

It's decent at

Falls behind in

Detailed scores

Updated: Jul 18, 2026

Overall

1 metric

Overall score74.0#9 / 83
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Overall score
LMSpeed rank#9
Score74.0
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3

Agents

V3.0

14 metrics · Rated

Score47.9#3780% interval42.1–53.74/4 Measured dimensionsAgentic score66.5#18 / 52Claw-Eval57.8#17 / 28
Dimensions and evidence
Planning & decomposition54.1
1 family · 1 metric
deep_planning · gert_labs · z 0.54 · q 1.00
Tool use46.1
1 family · 2 metrics
tau · aa_tau3_banking · z -2.55 · q 1.00
tau · tau2_bench · z 0.72 · q 1.00
Environment & long-horizon execution48.6
4 families · 4 metrics
deep_search_qa · deep_search_qa · z -0.57 · q 1.00
enterprise_ops_gym · aa_enterprise_ops_gym · z -0.06 · q 1.00
gdpval_aa · benchlm_agentic_gdpval_aa · z -0.52 · q 1.00
itbench · aa_itbench · z -1.18 · q 1.00
Recovery & completion reliability42.7
4 families · 4 metrics
apex_agents · apex_agents_aa · z 0.54 · q 1.00
claw_eval · claw_eval · z -0.33 · q 1.00
harvey_lab · aa_harvey_lab · z -1.97 · q 1.00
researchclaw · research_claw_bench · z -1.74 · q 1.00
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Agentic score
LMSpeed rank#18
Score66.5
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
Claw-EvalV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#17
Score57.8
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
DeepSearchQAV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#7
Score69.7
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
Τ²-bench resultsV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#15
Score95.6
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
AA Agentic Index
LMSpeed rank#35
Score21.4
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
APEX-Agents-AAV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#6
Score32.0
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
GDPval-AA
LMSpeed rank#37
Score23.2
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
GDPval-AAV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#37
Score965.0
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
Gert LabsV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#14
Score56.9
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
ResearchClawBenchV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#18
Score13.3
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
AA AutomationBench
LMSpeed rank#10
Score37.5
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
AA EnterpriseOps-GymV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#8
Score42.2
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
AA ITBenchV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#13
Score30.3
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
AA Tau3 BankingV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#14
Score16.5
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3

Coding

V3.0

8 metrics · Rated

Score56#1580% interval47.3–64.73/4 Measured dimensionsCoding score66.4#12 / 64LiveCodeBench Pro82.9#2 / 4
Dimensions and evidence
Code generation66
2 families · 2 metrics
livecodebench · live_code_bench_pro · z 0.54 · q 0.50
scicode · aa_sci_code · z 1.89 · q 1.00
Repository engineering51.9
2 families · 2 metrics
react_native_bench · react_native_evals · z 0.10 · q 1.00
vibecode · vibe_code_bench · z 0.27 · q 1.00
Debugging & testingPrior only
Tool-assisted development & quality50.1
1 family · 2 metrics
terminalbench · aa_terminal_bench21 · z -0.82 · q 1.00
terminalbench · terminal_bench_hard · z 0.27 · q 1.00
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Coding score
LMSpeed rank#12
Score66.4
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
LiveCodeBench ProV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#2
Score82.9
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
React Native EvalsV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#6
Score78.9
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
Vibe Code BenchV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#13
Score32.0
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
AA Coding Index
LMSpeed rank#12
Score68.8
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
Terminal-Bench HardV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#6
Score53.8
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
AA-SciCodeV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#2
Score58.9
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
AA Terminal-Bench 2.1V3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#12
Score73.8
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3

Reasoning

V3.0

4 metrics · Rated

Score59.8#480% interval51.0–68.53/4 Measured dimensionsReasoning score87.6#4 / 19ARC-AGI-277.1#3 / 9
Dimensions and evidence
Abstract logic56.4
1 family · 1 metric
arc_agi · arc_agi2 · z 0.33 · q 1.00
Scientific & causal reasoning65.8
3 families · 4 metrics
critpt · critpt · z 1.06 · q 1.00
gpqa · aa_gpqa_diamond · z 1.59 · q 1.00
hle · aa_hle · z 1.42 · q 1.00
hle · hle_no_tools · z 0.55 · q 1.00
Multi-step constraintsPrior only
Evidence integration & verification57.1
1 family · 1 metric
lcr · lcr · z 0.53 · q 1.00
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Reasoning score
LMSpeed rank#4
Score87.6
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
ARC-AGI-2V3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#3
Score77.1
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
AA-LCRV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#12
Score72.7
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
CritPtV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#11
Score17.7
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3

Knowledge

V3.0

11 metrics · Provisional

Score57.880% interval42.7–73.01/4 Measured dimensionsKnowledge score72.8#24 / 54GPQA-D94.3#2 / 23
Dimensions and evidence
Broad knowledgePrior only
Professional knowledge57.8
2 families · 2 metrics
healthbench · health_bench_hard · z -1.24 · q 0.88
medxpert · med_xpert_qa_text · z 2.02 · q 0.50
FactualityPrior only
Retrieval & open-book usePrior only
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Knowledge score
LMSpeed rank#24
Score72.8
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
GPQA-D
LMSpeed rank#2
Score94.3
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
HLE w/o tools
LMSpeed rank#3
Score45.4
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
HealthBench HardV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#5
Score20.6
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
MedXpertQA (Text)V3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#1
Score71.5
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
LMSpeed rank#13
Score46.5
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
AA-GPQA Diamond
LMSpeed rank#1
Score94.1
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
AA-HLE
LMSpeed rank#4
Score44.7
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
AA-Omniscience Index
LMSpeed rank#2
Score32.9
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
AA-Omniscience Accuracy
LMSpeed rank#5
Score55.3
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate
LMSpeed rank#68
Score49.9
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3

Math

V3.0

3 metrics · Provisional

Score55.380% interval39.2–71.41/4 Measured dimensionsMath score55.2#28 / 56FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)36.9#15 / 47
Dimensions and evidence
Foundational mathPrior only
Competition mathPrior only
Advanced proofs55.3
1 family · 2 metrics
frontiermath · frontier_math_v2_tier4 · z 0.62 · q 1.00
frontiermath · frontier_math_v2_tiers13 · z 0.36 · q 1.00
Applied & tool-assisted mathPrior only
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Math score
LMSpeed rank#28
Score55.2
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)V3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#15
Score36.9
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)V3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#13
Score16.7
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3

Multilingual

V3.0

1 metric · Provisional

Score59.780% interval42.5–77.01/4 Measured dimensionsAA Global-MMLU-Lite93.2#1 / 4
Dimensions and evidence
Cross-language understanding59.7
1 family · 1 metric
global_mmlu · aa_global_mmlu_lite · z 0.76 · q 0.50
Multilingual generationPrior only
Reasoning transferPrior only
Low-resource robustnessPrior only
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
AA Global-MMLU-LiteV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#1
Score93.2
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3

Multimodal

V3.0

10 metrics · Rated

Score56#280% interval49.3–62.74/4 Measured dimensionsMultimodal Grounded score80.9#5 / 34MMMU-Pro83.9#2 / 26
Dimensions and evidence
Perception & OCR53.7
1 family · 1 metric
simplevqa · simple_vqa · z 0.84 · q 0.88
Document & spatial understanding48.3
1 family · 1 metric
charxiv · charxiv · z -0.19 · q 1.00
Visual reasoning65.6
3 families · 3 metrics
erqa · erqa · z 0.63 · q 0.75
medxpert · med_xpert_qa_mm · z 1.38 · q 0.63
mmmu_pro · mmmu_pro · z 1.68 · q 1.00
Video & grounded action56.2
1 family · 1 metric
screenspot · screen_spot_pro · z 0.53 · q 1.00
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Multimodal Grounded score
LMSpeed rank#5
Score80.9
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
MMMU-ProV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#2
Score83.9
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
CharXivV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#13
Score80.2
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
ERQAV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#2
Score69.4
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
SimpleVQAV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#3
Score72.4
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
ScreenSpot ProV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#3
Score84.4
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
ZeroBench
LMSpeed rank#2
Score29.0
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
MedXpertQA (MM)V3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#1
Score81.3
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
AA-MMMU-Pro
LMSpeed rank#3
Score82.4
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
Design Arena Website
LMSpeed rank#20
Score1284.0
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3

Instruction following

V3.0

2 metrics · Provisional

Score55.680% interval39.6–71.61/4 Measured dimensionsInstruction Following score85.8#12 / 26AA-IFBench77.1#10 / 86
Dimensions and evidence
Constraint followingPrior only
Structured outputPrior only
Novel-instruction generalization55.6
1 family · 1 metric
ifbench · aa_if_bench · z 0.45 · q 1.00
Multi-turn & long instructionsPrior only
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Instruction Following score
LMSpeed rank#12
Score85.8
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3
AA-IFBenchV3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#10
Score77.1
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedJul 18, 2026
Confidence3

Pricing Comparison

Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro API pricing across 599 providers. Prices range from $0.0020/request to $1600.00/M. X666 API offers the lowest rate at $0.0020/request. 8 providers offer free API credits or a free tier.

ProviderHealthModel VariantGroupInput ($/M)Output ($/M)Speed (t/s)First tokenAudit
速创API
L1
99%
Geminigemini-3.1-pro-preview
default
$2.00/M
$12.00/M
105.4 t/s
12.72 s
—
Tokeness
L1
100%
Geminigemini-3.1-pro
Gemini
$0.600/M
Cache read$0.060/M
$3.60/M
97.9 t/s
12.32 s
—
钠 API
L1
100%
Geminigemini-3.1-pro-preview
default
$0.0041/request
-
95.5 t/s
13.02 s
—
L1
100%
Geminigemini-3.1-pro-low
default
$0.0041/request
-
—
—
—
L1
100%
Geminigemini-3.1-pro-high
default
$0.0041/request
-
—
—
—
贵州大模型云算力 Token
L1
100%
Geminigemini-3.1-pro
default
$20.00/M
Cache read$2.00/MCache write$10.00/MCache write 1h$16.00/M
$100.00/M
88.8 t/s
11.90 s
—
小水管 API
L1
99%
Geminigemini-3.1-pro
vip
$14.60/M
$73.00/M
88.6 t/s
14.35 s
—
Hi API
L1
100%
Geminigemini-3.1-pro-preview
default
$2.80/M
$16.80/M
70.1 t/s
23.27 s
—
L1
100%
Geminigemini-3.1-pro-preview-customtools
default
$2.80/M
$16.80/M
—
—
—
L1
100%
Geminigemini-3.1-pro
default
$2.80/M
$16.80/M
—
—
—
柠檬API
L1
4%
Geminigemini-3.1-pro-preview
Gemini特价
$0.036/request
-
68.9 t/s
19.70 s
—
YUNWU API
L1
100%
Geminigemini-3.1-pro-preview
gemini-cli
$0.137/M
$0.822/M
—
—
848480100
PackyAPI
L1
100%
Geminigemini-3.1-pro-preview
gemini-slb
$0.857/M
$5.14/M
—
—
—
V-API
L1
100%
Geminigemini-3.1-pro-preview-low
gemini_cli
$1.00/M
$6.00/M
—
—
—
L1
100%
Geminigemini-3.1-pro-preview-high
gemini_cli
$1.00/M
$6.00/M
—
—
—
L1
100%
Geminigemini-3.1-pro-preview
gemini_cli
$1.00/M
$6.00/M
—
—
—
Leonhard API
L1
99%
Gemini[按量]gemini-3.1-pro
gemini按量
$0.015/request
-
—
—
—
L1
99%
Geminigemini-3.1-pro-preview
gemini按次
$0.030/request
-
—
—
—
L1
99%
Geminigemini-3.1-pro-high
酒馆模型
$0.050/request
-
—
—
—
L1
99%
Geminigemini-3.1-pro-low
酒馆模型
$0.050/request
-
—
—
—
Showing 20 model IDs of 217.

Alternatives & Similar Models

Related model comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

What benchmark data does Gemini 3.1 Pro include?
LMSpeed shows Gemini 3.1 Pro benchmark context, API price, output speed, first-token latency, and provider data across 607 providers when those signals are available.
What is the Gemini 3.1 Pro API price?
Gemini 3.1 Pro has pricing from 607 providers, ranging from $0.0020/request to $1600.00/M. X666 API has the lowest listed price.
What does the Gemini 3.1 Pro API pricing table include?
The Gemini 3.1 Pro API pricing table compares 607 providers by input price, output price, free tier status, speed, first-token latency, and recent health data when available.
Which provider has the cheapest Gemini 3.1 Pro API pricing?

Also known as

Gemini-3-1-ProGemini-3.1-ProNotion/gemini-3.1-pro-preview[C][0.35/次]流式抗截断/gemini-3.1-pro-preview[L]gemini-3.1-pro-preview

Build with LMSpeed Data

Free

Free public API for LLM pricing, benchmarks & provider data

  • Real-time pricing & availability
  • Speed & latency benchmarks
  • 300+ models, 600+ providers
  • 1,000 requests/day
View API Documentation
Output
Released
Feb 2026
Documentation
OpenRouterOllama
Tokenizer
Gemini
Architecture
text+image+file+audio+video->text
Moderated
No
Supported parameters
include_reasoningmax_tokensreasoningresponse_formatseedstopstructured_outputstemperaturetool_choicetoolstop_p
X666 API currently has the lowest listed Gemini 3.1 Pro price at $0.0020/request across 607 providers.
Can I compare Gemini 3.1 Pro API price and speed together?
Yes. LMSpeed shows Gemini 3.1 Pro API price, output speed, first-token latency, and provider health on the same page so you can compare cost and performance together.
Is Gemini 3.1 Pro API free?
Yes, Gemini 3.1 Pro free API options are available through 8 providers on LMSpeed, including 梦德 API, Moyanjdc API, 兔子API, 兔子API, 兔子API. These providers offer free API credits or a free tier with no per-token charges.
Where can I get Gemini 3.1 Pro free API access?
LMSpeed currently lists 8 free API providers for Gemini 3.1 Pro: 梦德 API, Moyanjdc API, 兔子API, 兔子API, 兔子API. Check each provider row before using it because free tier limits can change.

OpenAIGPT-5.4

gpt-5-4

OpenAI GPT-5.4 extends the GPT-5 family with stronger instruction following, deeper tool use, and improved performance on coding, math, and long-document analysis.

215 shared providers

ClaudeClaude Sonnet 4.6

claude-sonnet-4-6

Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 extends the Sonnet line with improved tool use, coding reliability, and long-context performance for everyday production workloads.

197 shared providers

ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

Anthropic Claude Opus 4.6 is the most capable Claude Opus tier, optimized for complex analysis, long-horizon coding, and high-stakes enterprise reasoning workloads.

196 shared providers

GeminiGemini 3 Flash

gemini-3-flash

Google Gemini 3 Flash is a next-generation fast multimodal model for responsive assistants, document understanding, and high-throughput API traffic.

196 shared providers

OpenAIGPT-5.3 Codex

gpt-5-3-codex

OpenAI GPT-5.3 Codex is a code-specialized variant in the GPT-5 series, optimized for code generation, debugging, and software development tasks.

194 shared providers

OpenAIGPT-5.2

gpt-5-2

OpenAI GPT-5.2 is a GPT-5 series model emphasizing advanced reasoning, multimodal understanding, and high-quality outputs for complex enterprise workloads.

191 shared providers

GGemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.4

6 verified comparison points

Indexable

CClaude Sonnet 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

6 verified comparison points

Indexable

CClaude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

6 verified comparison points

Indexable

Data as of Jul 18, 2026, 01:40 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.·Standard benchmark data may include BenchLM and other public sources.