Google
·Released on Feb 19, 2026Gemini 3.1 Pro API Benchmarks, Pricing & Provider Data
Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro with another model
Choose a model to open its comparison page.
LLM
Gemini 3.1 Pro benchmark, API pricing, and provider data cover 659 API providers, with prices starting at $0.0041/request. Gemini 3.1 Pro free API options are available from 8 providers. The page also shows measured API speed and first-token latency.
Google Gemini 3.1 Pro is a Gemini 3 series model with advanced multimodal reasoning, long-context support, and strong performance on coding and analytical tasks.
Quality
#22of 100
67.0
LMSpeed score
Speed
149char/s
16.52 s
Cost
$0.0041/ 1M · 8:1 in:out
$0.0007 in · $0.0035 out
Category Performance
Observed-capability estimates with uncertainty reported separately from independent benchmark families.
- Coverage
- 8 / 8
- Methodology
- V3.0
#1Multilingual59.7Provisional1/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 42.5–77.0
cross language understanding59.7
global_mmlu · aa_global_mmlu_lite
multilingual generationPrior only
reasoning transferPrior only
low resource robustnessPrior only
#2Coding58.8Estimated2/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 48.1–69.4
code generation65.6
livecodebench · live_code_bench_pro / scicode · aa_sci_code
repository engineering51.9
react_native_bench · react_native_evals / vibecode · vibe_code_bench
debugging testingPrior only
tooling qualityPrior only
#3Reasoning58.3RatedGlobal rank #93/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 49.5–67.0
abstract logic53.1
arc_agi · arc_agi2
scientific causal64.1
critpt · critpt / gpqa · aa_gpqa_diamond / hle · aa_hle / hle · hle_no_tools
multistep constraintsPrior only
evidence verification57.5
lcr · lcr
#4Knowledge57.8Provisional1/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 42.7–73.0
broad knowledgePrior only
professional knowledge57.8
healthbench · health_bench_hard / medxpert · med_xpert_qa_text
factualityPrior only
retrieval open bookPrior only
#5Multimodal55.4RatedGlobal rank #24/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 48.8–62.1
perception ocr53
simplevqa · simple_vqa
document spatial48
charxiv · charxiv
visual reasoning64.1
erqa · erqa / medxpert · med_xpert_qa_mm / mmmu_pro · mmmu_pro
video action56.7
screenspot · screen_spot_pro
#6Math55.3Provisional1/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 39.2–71.4
foundational mathPrior only
competition mathPrior only
proof frontier55.3
frontiermath · frontier_math_v2_tier4 / frontiermath · frontier_math_v2_tiers13
applied tool mathPrior only
#7Instruction following55.1Provisional1/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 39.1–71.1
constraint followingPrior only
structured outputPrior only
novel instruction generalization55.1
ifbench · aa_if_bench
long multiturn instructionPrior only
#8Agents50.6RatedGlobal rank #344/4 Measured dimensions
80% interval: 44.4–56.7
planning54
deep_planning · gert_labs
tool use56
tau · tau2_bench
environment execution45.9
deep_search_qa · deep_search_qa / gdpval_aa · benchlm_agentic_gdpval_aa
recovery reliability46.4
apex_agents · apex_agents_aa / claw_eval · claw_eval / researchclaw · research_claw_bench
Specifications
Input and output token limits for this model, plus how it ranks on long-context understanding.
INPUT
1.0Mtokens
≈ 1.3K pages of text
OUTPUT
65.5Ktokens
8K128K1M4M
1.0M
Features
Rankings
Excels at
It's decent at
Falls behind in
Detailed scores
Updated: Sep 1, 2026Overall
undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
Overall score67.0#22 / 100
Overall
undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Agents
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Rated
Score50.6#3480% interval44.4–56.74/4 Measured dimensionsAgentic score67.5#26 / 69Claw-Eval57.8#16 / 27
Agents
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Rated
Dimensions and evidence
Planning & decomposition54
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
deep_planning · gert_labs · z 0.55 · q 1.00
Tool use56
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
tau · tau2_bench · z 0.69 · q 1.00
Environment & long-horizon execution45.9
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
deep_search_qa · deep_search_qa · z -0.58 · q 1.00
gdpval_aa · benchlm_agentic_gdpval_aa · z -0.59 · q 1.00
Recovery & completion reliability46.4
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
apex_agents · apex_agents_aa · z 0.44 · q 1.00
claw_eval · claw_eval · z -0.29 · q 1.00
researchclaw · research_claw_bench · z -1.64 · q 1.00
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Coding
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Estimated
Score58.880% interval48.1–69.42/4 Measured dimensionsCoding score59.4#23 / 81LiveCodeBench Pro82.9#2 / 4
Coding
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Estimated
Dimensions and evidence
Code generation65.6
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
livecodebench · live_code_bench_pro · z 0.54 · q 0.50
scicode · aa_sci_code · z 1.89 · q 1.00
Repository engineering51.9
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
react_native_bench · react_native_evals · z 0.10 · q 1.00
vibecode · vibe_code_bench · z 0.27 · q 1.00
Debugging & testingPrior only
Tool-assisted development & qualityPrior only
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Reasoning
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Rated
Score58.3#980% interval49.5–67.03/4 Measured dimensionsReasoning score72.4#12 / 29ARC-AGI-277.1#6 / 17
Reasoning
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Rated
Dimensions and evidence
Abstract logic53.1
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
arc_agi · arc_agi2 · z 0.24 · q 1.00
Scientific & causal reasoning64.1
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
critpt · critpt · z 0.83 · q 1.00
gpqa · aa_gpqa_diamond · z 1.50 · q 1.00
hle · aa_hle · z 1.13 · q 1.00
hle · hle_no_tools · z 0.43 · q 1.00
Multi-step constraintsPrior only
Evidence integration & verification57.5
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
lcr · lcr · z 0.65 · q 1.00
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Knowledge
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Provisional
Score57.880% interval42.7–73.01/4 Measured dimensionsKnowledge score66.7#37 / 69GPQA-D94.3#2 / 31
Knowledge
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Provisional
Dimensions and evidence
Broad knowledgePrior only
Professional knowledge57.8
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
healthbench · health_bench_hard · z -1.24 · q 0.88
medxpert · med_xpert_qa_text · z 2.02 · q 0.50
FactualityPrior only
Retrieval & open-book usePrior only
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index
LMSpeed rank#23
Score47.7
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
AA-Omniscience Hallucination Rate
LMSpeed rank#73
Score50.9
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
Math
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Provisional
Score55.380% interval39.2–71.41/4 Measured dimensionsMath score55.1#34 / 62FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)36.9#15 / 47
Math
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Provisional
Dimensions and evidence
Foundational mathPrior only
Competition mathPrior only
Advanced proofs55.3
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
frontiermath · frontier_math_v2_tier4 · z 0.62 · q 1.00
frontiermath · frontier_math_v2_tiers13 · z 0.36 · q 1.00
Applied & tool-assisted mathPrior only
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
FrontierMath v2 (Tiers 1-3)V3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#15
Score36.9
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
FrontierMath v2 (Tier 4)V3 evidence
LMSpeed rank#13
Score16.7
Sourcebenchlm.ai
UpdatedSep 1, 2026
Confidence3
Multilingual
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Provisional
Score59.780% interval42.5–77.01/4 Measured dimensionsAA Global-MMLU-Lite93.2#1 / 4
Multilingual
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Provisional
Dimensions and evidence
Cross-language understanding59.7
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
global_mmlu · aa_global_mmlu_lite · z 0.76 · q 0.50
Multilingual generationPrior only
Reasoning transferPrior only
Low-resource robustnessPrior only
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Multimodal
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Rated
Score55.4#280% interval48.8–62.14/4 Measured dimensionsMultimodal Grounded score76.8#9 / 44MMMU-Pro83.9#2 / 31
Multimodal
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Rated
Dimensions and evidence
Perception & OCR53
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
simplevqa · simple_vqa · z 0.43 · q 1.00
Document & spatial understanding48
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
charxiv · charxiv · z -0.14 · q 1.00
Visual reasoning64.1
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
erqa · erqa · z 0.61 · q 1.00
medxpert · med_xpert_qa_mm · z 0.86 · q 0.75
mmmu_pro · mmmu_pro · z 1.46 · q 1.00
Video & grounded action56.7
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
screenspot · screen_spot_pro · z 0.60 · q 1.00
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Instruction following
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Provisional
Score55.180% interval39.1–71.11/4 Measured dimensionsAA-IFBench77.1#8 / 84
Instruction following
V3.0undefined metric} other undefined metrics}} · Provisional
Dimensions and evidence
Constraint followingPrior only
Structured outputPrior only
Novel-instruction generalization55.1
undefined family} other undefined families}} · undefined metric} other undefined metrics}}
ifbench · aa_if_bench · z 0.41 · q 1.00
Multi-turn & long instructionsPrior only
Benchmark
LMSpeed rank
Score
Source
Updated
Confidence
Pricing Comparison
Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro API pricing across 651 providers. Prices range from $0.0041/request to $1600.00/M. 钠 API offers the lowest rate at $0.0041/request. 8 providers offer free API credits or a free tier.
Showing 20 model IDs of 237.
Alternatives & Similar Models
GPT-5.4
gpt-5-4
OpenAI GPT-5.4 extends the GPT-5 family with stronger instruction following, deeper tool use, and improved performance on coding, math, and long-document analysis.
231 shared providers
Claude Opus 4.6
claude-opus-4-6
Anthropic Claude Opus 4.6 is the most capable Claude Opus tier, optimized for complex analysis, long-horizon coding, and high-stakes enterprise reasoning workloads.
210 shared providers
Claude Sonnet 4.6
claude-sonnet-4-6
Anthropic Claude Sonnet 4.6 extends the Sonnet line with improved tool use, coding reliability, and long-context performance for everyday production workloads.
210 shared providers
Gemini 3 Flash
gemini-3-flash
Google Gemini 3 Flash is a next-generation fast multimodal model for responsive assistants, document understanding, and high-throughput API traffic.
210 shared providers
GPT-5.3 Codex
gpt-5-3-codex
OpenAI GPT-5.3 Codex is a code-specialized variant in the GPT-5 series, optimized for code generation, debugging, and software development tasks.
205 shared providers
GPT-5.2
gpt-5-2
OpenAI GPT-5.2 is a GPT-5 series model emphasizing advanced reasoning, multimodal understanding, and high-quality outputs for complex enterprise workloads.
199 shared providers
Frequently Asked Questions
- What benchmark data does Gemini 3.1 Pro include?
- LMSpeed shows Gemini 3.1 Pro benchmark context, API price, output speed, first-token latency, and provider data across 659 providers when those signals are available.
- What is the Gemini 3.1 Pro API price?
- Gemini 3.1 Pro has pricing from 659 providers, ranging from $0.0041/request to $1600.00/M. 钠 API has the lowest listed price.
- What does the Gemini 3.1 Pro API pricing table include?
- The Gemini 3.1 Pro API pricing table compares 659 providers by input price, output price, free tier status, speed, first-token latency, and recent health data when available.
- Which provider has the cheapest Gemini 3.1 Pro API pricing?
- 钠 API currently has the lowest listed Gemini 3.1 Pro price at $0.0041/request across 659 providers.
- Can I compare Gemini 3.1 Pro API price and speed together?
- Yes. LMSpeed shows Gemini 3.1 Pro API price, output speed, first-token latency, and provider health on the same page so you can compare cost and performance together.
- Is Gemini 3.1 Pro API free?
- Yes, Gemini 3.1 Pro free API options are available through 8 providerundefined other undefined} on LMSpeed, including 兔子API, 兔子API, 兔子API, 兔子API, 梦德 API. These providers offer free API credits or a free tier with no per-token charges.
- Where can I get Gemini 3.1 Pro free API access?
- LMSpeed currently lists 8 free API providerundefined other undefined} for Gemini 3.1 Pro: 兔子API, 兔子API, 兔子API, 兔子API, 梦德 API. Check each provider row before using it because free tier limits can change.