LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 58

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for BGE Large EN V1.5 and Claude Opus 4.6, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 0 to 4.

Evidence depth

58 data points

Includes 0 benchmark rows, 1 audit samples, and 9 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with Claude Opus 4.6

The charts below split 10 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

BGE Large EN V1.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6

bge-large-en-v1-5-vs-claude-opus-4-6

Model A

BGE Large EN V1.5

Model B

Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

Overall leaderContenderLeading
Verified metric wins0 wins4 wins
Where it leadsNo dataCheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests
Model metadataNo OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model.Claude Opus 4.6 exposes 1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.
DeveloperNo dataAnthropic
Context windowNo data1M tokens
Max outputNo data128K tokens
ReleasedNo dataApr 2026
ModalitiesNo data

Input

TextImageFile

Output

Text
FeaturesNone listed
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerNo dataClaude
Knowledge cutoffNo dataNo data
OpenRouter IDNo dataanthropic/claude-opus-4.6-fast
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
BGE Large EN V1.5
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
No shared benchmark metrics are available yet.

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
BGE Large EN V1.5
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
Cuz AIWinner: Claude Opus 4.6

BGE Large EN V1.5

bge-large-en-v1.5

No audit yet

Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

Audit score

89

View report
56100100100

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
BGE Large EN V1.5
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
Cuz AI5 tests

BGE Large EN V1.5

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

43 tok/s / 2285ms

input / output

No data

素墨API5 tests

BGE Large EN V1.5

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

47 tok/s / 2344ms

input / output

No data

AI API0 tests

BGE Large EN V1.5

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

CM-API 公益站0 tests

BGE Large EN V1.5

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Newagiai0 tests

BGE Large EN V1.5

BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

$0.027/M / $0.027/M

Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6-thinking

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

$0.685/M / $3.42/M

柏拉图AI

BGE Large EN V1.5

BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.027/M / $0.027/M

Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6-thinking

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.685/M / $3.42/M

小豆包API

BGE Large EN V1.5

BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.041/M / $0.041/M

Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6-thinking

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$1.03/M / $5.14/M

初叶🍂Furry API

BGE Large EN V1.5

BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.050/M / $0.050/M

Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.500/M / $0.500/M

神马中转API

BGE Large EN V1.5

BAAI/bge-large-en-v1.5

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.055/M / $0.055/M

Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6-thinking

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$1.37/M / $6.85/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for BGE Large EN V1.5 and Claude Opus 4.6: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
BGE Large EN V1.5
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
When to choose each model

BGE Large EN V1.5

BGE Large EN V1.5 does not clearly lead on the verified metrics here, so check provider-specific pricing before choosing.

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests.

FAQ

TL;DR: Claude Opus 4.6 leads across 58 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 4 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from BGE Large EN V1.5 vs Claude Opus 4.6 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

BGE Large EN V1.5 vs GPT-5.44 verified data pointsBGE Large EN V1.5 vs GPT-54 verified data pointsBGE Large EN V1.5 vs GPT-5.24 verified data pointsBGE Large EN V1.5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro4 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 04:44 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.