Data points: 57
The readout for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Pro, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 1 to 5.
Evidence depth
57 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 10 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Gemini 2.5 Pro
The charts below split 10 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Model compare Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.5 Proclaude-3-5-sonnet-vs-gemini-2-5-pro | Model A Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Model B Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Contender | Leading |
| Verified metric wins | 1 wins | 5 wins |
| Where it leads | First-token latency | Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests |
| Model metadata | No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model. | Gemini 2.5 Pro exposes 1.0M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Audio input. |
| Developer | Anthropic | |
| Context window | No data | 1.0M tokens |
| Max output | No data | 65.5K tokens |
| Released | No data | Jun 2025 |
| Modalities | No data | Input TextImageFileAudiovideo Output Text |
| Features | None listed | Text inputImage inputFile inputAudio inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | No data | Gemini |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | 2025-01-31 |
| OpenRouter ID | No data | google/gemini-2.5-pro |
| References | No data | No data |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
| Metric | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| No shared benchmark metrics are available yet. | ||
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
MN API15 tests | Claude 3.5 Sonnet speed / latency 31 tok/s / 3217ms input / output No data | Gemini 2.5 Pro speed / latency 103 tok/s / 16912ms input / output No data |
ModelPool5 tests | Claude 3.5 Sonnet speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 2.5 Pro speed / latency 81 tok/s / 21179ms input / output No data |
AASS API0 tests | Claude 3.5 Sonnet speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 2.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
AIGCBAR0 tests | Claude 3.5 Sonnet speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 2.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
AIO通用智能服务平台0 tests | Claude 3.5 Sonnet speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 2.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Claude 3.5 Sonnet claude-3-5-sonnet-all speed / latency No data input / output $0.011/M / $0.011/M | Gemini 2.5 Pro gemini-2.5-pro-as speed / latency No data input / output $10.27/M / $82.19/M | |
Claude 3.5 Sonnet claude-3-5-sonnet-all speed / latency No data input / output $0.011/M / $0.011/M | Gemini 2.5 Pro gemini-2.5-pro-as speed / latency No data input / output $10.27/M / $82.19/M | |
Claude 3.5 Sonnet claude-3-5-sonnet-all speed / latency No data input / output $0.016/M / $0.016/M | Gemini 2.5 Pro gemini-2.5-pro-as speed / latency No data input / output $15.41/M / $123.29/M | |
Claude 3.5 Sonnet claude-3.5-sonnet speed / latency No data input / output $1.23/M / $6.16/M | Gemini 2.5 Pro gemini-2.5-pro-search speed / latency No data input / output $0.021/M / $0.164/M | |
Claude 3.5 Sonnet claude-3.5-sonnet speed / latency No data input / output $0.041/M / $0.205/M | Gemini 2.5 Pro gemini-2.5-pro speed / latency No data input / output $0.034/M / $0.274/M |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Pro: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | Claude 3.5 Sonnet | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | Claude 3.5 Sonnet Claude 3.5 Sonnet is stronger when you prioritize First-token latency. | Gemini 2.5 Pro Gemini 2.5 Pro is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests. |
TL;DR: Gemini 2.5 Pro leads across 57 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.5 Pro into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
