Data points: 71
Model compare
The readout for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Pro, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: Gemini 2.5 Pro. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 30.7 to 69.3.
Evidence depth
71 data points
Includes 7 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 7 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Gemini 2.5 Pro
The charts below split 14 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Pro: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Contender | Leading |
| Weighted overall score | 30.7 pts | 69.3 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 1 categories | 2 categories |
| Operational advantages | First-token latency | Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage |
| Context window | No data | 1.0M tokens |
| Max output | No data | 65.5K tokens |
| Modalities | No data | Input TextImageFileAudiovideo |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | |
| Released | No data | Jun 2025 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | No data | Gemini |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | 2025-01-31 |
| OpenRouter ID | No data | google/gemini-2.5-pro |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Pro: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is stronger in benchmark categories (Coding) and operational dimensions (First-token latency).
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro is stronger in benchmark categories (Reasoning, Math) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage).
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
48.4
Avg. score
Gemini 2.5 Pro
46.3
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads by 8.9
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads by 7.1
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
83.7%
Rank #32/125 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner86.2%
Rank #15/125 · confidence 4
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
77.2%
Rank #87/188 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner84.4%
Rank #49/188 · confidence 4
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
10.3%
Rank #92/187 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner21.1%
Rank #53/187 · confidence 4
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
47.3%
Rank #63/115 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner80.1%
Rank #18/115 · confidence 4
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
40.3%
Rank #66/185 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner42.8%
Rank #44/185 · confidence 4
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
48.7%
Rank #28/68 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner88.7%
Rank #5/68 · confidence 4
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
94.7%
Rank #21/74 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
winner96.7%
Rank #15/74 · confidence 4
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
10 tests | Claude 3.7 Sonnet speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 2.5 Pro speed / latency 103 tok/s / 16912ms input / output No data |
5 tests | Claude 3.7 Sonnet claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.321/M/$1.61/M | Gemini 2.5 Pro gemini-2.5-pro speed / latency 81 tok/s / 21179ms input / output $0.277/M |
5 tests | Claude 3.7 Sonnet speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 2.5 Pro speed / latency 111 tok/s / 17899ms input / output No data |
0 tests | Claude 3.7 Sonnet speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 2.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Claude 3.7 Sonnet speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 2.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Claude 3.7 Sonnet claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219 speed / latency No data input / output $0.0086/M/$0.043/M | Gemini 2.5 Pro gemini-2.5-pro-preview-06-05 speed / latency No data input / output $0.357/M | |
Claude 3.7 Sonnet claude-3-7-sonnet-20250219 speed / latency No data input / output $0.822/M/$4.11/M | Gemini 2.5 Pro gemini-2.5-pro speed / latency No data input / output $0.060/M |
Weighted outcome: Gemini 2.5 Pro. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Output
| Features | None listed | Text inputImage inputFile inputAudio inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
|---|
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads by 7.4
No data
No data
Gemini 2.5 Pro
