Data points: 127
Model compare
The readout for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Opus 4.7, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: Claude Opus 4.7. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 29.3 to 70.7.
Evidence depth
127 data points
Includes 14 benchmark rows, 6 audit samples, and 6 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Claude Opus 4.7
The charts below split 26 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Opus 4.7: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Contender | Leading |
| Weighted overall score | 29.3 pts | 70.7 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 1 categories | 5 categories |
| Operational advantages | Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage | Cheapest input price |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 1M tokens |
| Max output | 64K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Modalities | Input TextImageFile Output Text |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | Anthropic |
| Released | Oct 2025 | May 2026 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Claude | Claude |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 | anthropic/claude-opus-4.7 |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Claude Opus 4.7: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 is stronger in benchmark categories (Instruction following) and operational dimensions (Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage).
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 is stronger in benchmark categories (Agents, Coding, Reasoning, Knowledge, Math) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price).
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
Claude Haiku 4.5
49.6
Avg. score
Claude Opus 4.7
55.2
Claude Opus 4.7 leads by 11.1
Claude Opus 4.7 leads by 13.3
Claude Opus 4.7 leads by 9.0
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
Claude Haiku 4.5
53.0
Rank #66/127 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-15
Claude Opus 4.7
winner69.0
Rank #36/127 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-16
Claude Haiku 4.5
winner0.80 s
Rank #28/139 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.7
26.18 s
Rank #99/139 · confidence 4
Claude Haiku 4.5
winner0.80 s
Rank #40/139 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.7
26.18 s
Rank #126/139 · confidence 4
Claude Haiku 4.5
winner97.3 tok/s
Rank #65/139 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.7
53.0 tok/s
Rank #111/139 · confidence 4
Claude Haiku 4.5
winner$1.00/M
Rank #100/163 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.7
$5.00/M
Rank #147/163 · confidence 4
Claude Haiku 4.5
winner$2.00/M
Rank #103/163 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.7
$10.00/M
Rank #148/163 · confidence 4
Claude Haiku 4.5
winner$5.00/M
Rank #106/163 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.7
$25.00/M
Rank #148/163 · confidence 4
Claude Haiku 4.5
64.6%
Rank #130/187 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.7
winner91.4%
Rank #12/187 · confidence 4
Claude Haiku 4.5
4.3%
Rank #149/186 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.7
winner39.6%
Rank #13/186 · confidence 4
Claude Haiku 4.5
34.4%
Rank #114/184 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.7
winner54.5%
Rank #6/184 · confidence 4
Claude Haiku 4.5
2.1
Rank #32/35 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-15
Claude Opus 4.7
winner22.9
Rank #9/35 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-16
Claude Haiku 4.5
5.9
Rank #36/47 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-15
Claude Opus 4.7
winner43.8
Rank #9/47 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-16
Claude Haiku 4.5
29.5
Rank #46/59 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-15
Claude Opus 4.7
winner65.7
Rank #19/59 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-16
Claude Haiku 4.5
1156.0
Rank #51/65 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-15
Claude Opus 4.7
winner1328.0
Rank #5/65 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-16
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
Winner: Claude Opus 4.7 | Claude Haiku 4.5 claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 No audit yet | Claude Opus 4.7 claude-opus-4-7 Audit score 97 10010010088 |
Winner: Claude Haiku 4.5 | Claude Haiku 4.5 claude-haiku-4-5 Audit score 91 7610086100 | Claude Opus 4.7 claude-opus-4-7 No audit yet |
Winner: Claude Opus 4.7 | Claude Haiku 4.5 claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 No audit yet | Claude Opus 4.7 claude-opus-4-7 Audit score 91 64100100100 |
Winner: Claude Opus 4.7 | Claude Haiku 4.5 claude-haiku-4.5 Audit score 84 648410088 | Claude Opus 4.7 claude-opus-4-7 Audit score 89 84 |
Winner: Claude Opus 4.7 | Claude Haiku 4.5 claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 No audit yet | Claude Opus 4.7 claude-opus-4-7 Audit score 87 848480100 |
Winner: Claude Opus 4.7 | Claude Haiku 4.5 claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 No audit yet | Claude Opus 4.7 claude-opus-4-7 Audit score 87 848480100 |
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Claude Opus 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
15 tests | Claude Haiku 4.5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Claude Opus 4.7 speed / latency 35 tok/s / 2753ms input / output No data |
15 tests | Claude Haiku 4.5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Claude Opus 4.7 speed / latency 38 tok/s / 3322ms input / output No data |
15 tests | Claude Haiku 4.5 speed / latency 112 tok/s / 1733ms input / output No data | Claude Opus 4.7 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
10 tests | Claude Haiku 4.5 speed / latency 88 tok/s / 2243ms input / output No data | Claude Opus 4.7 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
10 tests | Claude Haiku 4.5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Claude Opus 4.7 speed / latency 52 tok/s / 3590ms input / output No data |
Claude Haiku 4.5 claude-4-5-haiku speed / latency No data input / output $0/M/$0/M | Claude Opus 4.7 claude-opus-4-7 speed / latency No data input / output $40.15/M |
Weighted outcome: Claude Opus 4.7. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Input
Output
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
|---|
Claude Opus 4.7 leads by 9.5
Claude Opus 4.7 leads by 11.1
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads by 8.5
