Data points: 89
Model compare
Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GPT-4o
The readout for Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT-4o, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Key Takeaways
Weighted outcome: Claude Haiku 4.5. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 100 to 0.
Evidence depth
89 data points
Includes 12 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 10 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Claude Haiku 4.5
The charts below split 22 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Change comparison
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
Comparison sheet
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT-4o: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | Claude Haiku 4.5 | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 100.0 pts | 0.0 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 4 categories | 0 categories |
| Operational advantages | Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage | No data |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Max output | 64K tokens | 16.4K tokens |
| Modalities | Input TextImageFile Output Text | Input TextImageFile Output Text |
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeWeb search |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
Model metadata
Model metadata
| Model compare | Claude Haiku 4.5 | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Released | Oct 2025 | Nov 2024 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Claude | GPT |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | 2023-10-31 |
| OpenRouter ID | anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 | openai/gpt-4o |
| References | No data | No data |
When to choose each model
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Haiku 4.5 and GPT-4o: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 is stronger in benchmark categories (Agents, Coding, Reasoning, Math) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage).
GPT-4o
GPT-4o does not clearly lead in the benchmark or operational dimensions shared by both models.
Benchmark score comparison
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Category performance
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
- Model A coverage
- 4 / 8
- Model B coverage
- 6 / 8
- Shared
- 4 shared categories
Avg. score
Claude Haiku 4.5
45.6
Avg. score
GPT-4o
43
Agents
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads by 3.5
Coding
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads by 0.5
Reasoning
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads by 7.6
Knowledge
GPT-4o
Math
Claude Haiku 4.5 leads by 3.5
Multilingual
No data
Multimodal
No data
Instruction following
GPT-4o
Professional benchmark details
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
Professional benchmark details
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
Claude Haiku 4.5
winner55.0
Rank #55/100 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-15
GPT-4o
43.0
Rank #91/100 · confidence 1 · eval date 2024-05-13
Claude Haiku 4.5
winner$1.00/M
Rank #110/180 · confidence 4
GPT-4o
$2.50/M
Rank #150/180 · confidence 4
Claude Haiku 4.5
winner$2.00/M
Rank #118/180 · confidence 4
GPT-4o
$4.38/M
Rank #145/180 · confidence 4
Claude Haiku 4.5
winner$5.00/M
Rank #123/180 · confidence 4
GPT-4o
$10.00/M
Rank #138/180 · confidence 4
Claude Haiku 4.5
winner80.0%
Rank #63/129 · confidence 4
GPT-4o
74.8%
Rank #90/129 · confidence 4
Claude Haiku 4.5
winner64.6%
Rank #153/212 · confidence 4
GPT-4o
54.3%
Rank #178/212 · confidence 4
Claude Haiku 4.5
winner4.2%
Rank #170/209 · confidence 4
GPT-4o
2.4%
Rank #207/209 · confidence 4
Claude Haiku 4.5
winner51.1%
Rank #59/115 · confidence 4
GPT-4o
30.9%
Rank #88/115 · confidence 4
Claude Haiku 4.5
winner34.4%
Rank #133/205 · confidence 4
GPT-4o
33.3%
Rank #138/205 · confidence 4
Claude Haiku 4.5
winner5.9
Rank #36/47 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-15
GPT-4o
0.3
Rank #47/47 · confidence 1 · eval date 2024-05-13
Claude Haiku 4.5
winner29.0
Rank #49/62 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-15
GPT-4o
25.2
Rank #60/62 · confidence 1 · eval date 2024-05-13
Claude Haiku 4.5
winner1133.0
Rank #62/75 · confidence 1 · eval date 2025-10-15
GPT-4o
842.0
Rank #74/75 · confidence 1 · eval date 2024-05-13
API audit comparison
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
API audit comparison
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Claude Haiku 4.5 | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Provider examples
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
Provider examples
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Claude Haiku 4.5 | GPT-4o |
|---|---|---|
速创API20 tests | Claude Haiku 4.5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-4o speed / latency 88 tok/s / 1593ms input / output No data |
N1N15 tests | Claude Haiku 4.5 speed / latency 112 tok/s / 1733ms input / output No data | GPT-4o speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Completions5 tests | Claude Haiku 4.5 speed / latency 21 tok/s / 1170ms input / output No data | GPT-4o speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
KFCV505 tests | Claude Haiku 4.5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-4o speed / latency 48 tok/s / 13138ms input / output No data |
My Claude Code5 tests | Claude Haiku 4.5 speed / latency 109 tok/s / 2221ms input / output No data | GPT-4o speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Claude Haiku 4.5 claude-haiku-4-5 speed / latency No data input / output $0.082/M/$0.411/M | GPT-4o gpt-4o speed / latency No data input / output $0/M/$0/M | |
Claude Haiku 4.5 claude-haiku-4-5 speed / latency No data input / output $0/M/$0/M | GPT-4o gpt-4o speed / latency No data input / output $75.00/M/$300.00/M | |
Claude Haiku 4.5 claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 speed / latency No data input / output $0/request | GPT-4o gpt-4o-all speed / latency No data input / output $0/request | |
Claude Haiku 4.5 claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 speed / latency No data input / output $0.0029/M/$0.014/M | GPT-4o gpt-4o-2024-08-06 speed / latency No data input / output $0.429/M/$1.71/M | |
Claude Haiku 4.5 claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 speed / latency No data input / output $0.110/M/$0.548/M | GPT-4o gpt-4o-all speed / latency No data input / output $0.0066/request |
FAQ
Weighted outcome: Claude Haiku 4.5. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
- Why is this comparison indexable?
- It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
- Are missing metrics invented?
- No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.
