LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 62

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 1.5 Flash, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

Tie

Tie currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 3 to 3.

Evidence depth

62 data points

Includes 3 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 8 provider examples.

Selection signal

Tie

The charts below split 11 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 1.5 Flash

claude-opus-4-6-vs-gemini-1-5-flash

Model A

Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

Model B

Gemini

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Overall leaderTieTie
Verified metric wins3 wins3 wins
Where it leadsFree providers, Provider coverage, Recent testsCheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency
Model metadataClaude Opus 4.6 exposes 1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model.
DeveloperAnthropicGoogle
Context window1M tokensNo data
Max output128K tokensNo data
ReleasedApr 2026No data
Modalities

Input

TextImageFile

Output

Text
No data
Features
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
None listed
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerClaudeNo data
Knowledge cutoffNo dataNo data
OpenRouter IDanthropic/claude-opus-4.6-fastNo data
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
GeminiGemini 1.5 Flash
SciCode
45.7%#20
26.7%#97
GPQA
84.0%#38
46.3%#124
HLE
18.6%#43
3.5%#100

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
GeminiGemini 1.5 Flash
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
GeminiGemini 1.5 Flash
V-API15 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Gemini

Gemini 1.5 Flash

speed / latency

163 tok/s / 1183ms

input / output

No data

丸美小沐15 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Gemini

Gemini 1.5 Flash

speed / latency

236 tok/s / 1159ms

input / output

No data

UoCode5 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

speed / latency

38 tok/s / 2611ms

input / output

$0.685/M / $3.42/M

Gemini

Gemini 1.5 Flash

models/gemini-1.5-flash

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

$0.014/M / $0.137/M

AIGCBAR0 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Gemini

Gemini 1.5 Flash

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

AIO通用智能服务平台0 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Gemini

Gemini 1.5 Flash

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

CHB API
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.068/M / $0.342/M

Gemini

Gemini 1.5 Flash

gemini-1.5-flash-latest

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0033/M / $0.013/M

Aitoke
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.685/M / $3.42/M

Gemini

Gemini 1.5 Flash

models/gemini-1.5-flash

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.014/M / $0.137/M

SanShui API
Claude

Claude Opus 4.6

claude-opus-4-6-thinking

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.685/M / $3.42/M

Gemini

Gemini 1.5 Flash

gemini-1.5-flash

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.096/M / $0.384/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 1.5 Flash: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6
GeminiGemini 1.5 Flash
When to choose each model

Claude Opus 4.6

Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger when you prioritize Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests.

Gemini 1.5 Flash

Gemini 1.5 Flash is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency.

FAQ

TL;DR: Tie leads across 62 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from Claude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 1.5 Flash into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

ClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-56 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.26 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro6 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 04:35 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.