Data points: 74
Model compare
The readout for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 1.5 Pro, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: Claude Opus 4.6. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 76 to 24.
Evidence depth
74 data points
Includes 9 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 7 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Claude Opus 4.6
The charts below split 16 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 1.5 Pro: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemini 1.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 76.0 pts | 24.0 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 3 categories | 1 categories |
| Operational advantages | Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage | First-token latency |
| Context window | 1M tokens | No data |
| Max output | 128K tokens | No data |
| Modalities | Input TextImageFile Output Text |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemini 1.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | |
| Released | Feb 2026 | No data |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Claude | No data |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | anthropic/claude-opus-4.6 | No data |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.6 and Gemini 1.5 Pro: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 is stronger in benchmark categories (Coding, Reasoning, Math) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage).
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Gemini 1.5 Pro is stronger in benchmark categories (Knowledge) and operational dimensions (First-token latency).
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
Claude Opus 4.6
53.4
Avg. score
Gemini 1.5 Pro
44.8
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by 19.1
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by 13.7
Gemini 1.5 Pro leads by 1.3
Claude Opus 4.6 leads by 12.9
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
Claude Opus 4.6
winner82.0%
Rank #47/125 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-02-01
Gemini 1.5 Pro
75.0%
Rank #89/125 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.6
winner84.0%
Rank #53/188 · confidence 4
Gemini 1.5 Pro
58.9%
Rank #144/188 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.6
winner18.6%
Rank #62/187 · confidence 4
Gemini 1.5 Pro
4.9%
Rank #138/187 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.6
winner45.7%
Rank #33/185 · confidence 4
Gemini 1.5 Pro
29.5%
Rank #139/185 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.6
winner45.7
Rank #37/96 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-02-01
Gemini 1.5 Pro
29.5
Rank #87/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2024-02-15
Claude Opus 4.6
winner37.8
Rank #39/99 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-02-01
Gemini 1.5 Pro
10.0
Rank #93/99 · confidence 1 · eval date 2024-02-15
Claude Opus 4.6
winner84.0
Rank #52/96 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-02-01
Gemini 1.5 Pro
58.9
Rank #86/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2024-02-15
Claude Opus 4.6
winner18.6
Rank #56/96 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-02-01
Gemini 1.5 Pro
4.9
Rank #80/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2024-02-15
Claude Opus 4.6
winner72.5
Rank #36/57 · confidence 3 · eval date 2026-02-01
Gemini 1.5 Pro
55.0
Rank #52/57 · confidence 1 · eval date 2024-02-15
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemini 1.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.6 | Gemini 1.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
5 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency 38 tok/s / 2611ms input / output No data | Gemini 1.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
5 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 1.5 Pro speed / latency 18 tok/s / 2583ms input / output No data |
0 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 1.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 1.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Claude Opus 4.6 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Gemini 1.5 Pro speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 speed / latency No data input / output $0/M/$0/M | Gemini 1.5 Pro gemini-1.5-pro speed / latency No data input / output $0/M | |
Claude Opus 4.6 claude-opus-4-6 speed / latency No data input / output $0/request | Gemini 1.5 Pro gemini-1.5-pro speed / latency No data input / output $0/request |
Weighted outcome: Claude Opus 4.6. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | None listed |
|---|
