LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 95

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.2, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

GPT-5.2

GPT-5.2 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 1 to 5.

Evidence depth

95 data points

Includes 8 benchmark rows, 3 audit samples, and 6 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with GPT-5.2

The charts below split 17 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.2

claude-opus-4-7-vs-gpt-5-2

Model A

Claude

Claude Opus 4.7

Model B

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

Overall leaderContenderLeading
Verified metric wins1 wins5 wins
Where it leadsFree providersCheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Provider coverage, Recent tests
Model metadataClaude Opus 4.7 exposes 1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.GPT-5.2 exposes 128K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.
DeveloperAnthropicOpenAI
Context window1M tokens128K tokens
Max output128K tokens16.4K tokens
ReleasedMay 2026Dec 2025
Modalities

Input

TextImageFile

Output

Text

Input

FileImageText

Output

Text
Features
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerClaudeGPT
Knowledge cutoffNo dataNo data
OpenRouter IDanthropic/claude-opus-4.7-fastopenai/gpt-5.2-chat
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.7
OpenAIGPT-5.2
GPQA
91.4%#5
90.3%#9
HLE
39.6%#6
35.4%#9
SciCode
54.5%#6
52.1%#9
Input price
$5.00/M#41
$1.75/M#35
Output price
$25.00/M#47
$14.00/M#43
Time to first answer token
11.82 s#59
122.93 s#109
Blended price
$10.00/M#68
$4.81/M#62
Output speed
52.3 tok/s#90
81.3 tok/s#70

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.7
OpenAIGPT-5.2
BUZZWinner: Claude Opus 4.7
Claude

Claude Opus 4.7

claude-opus-4-7

Audit score

97

View report
10010010088
OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2

No audit yet

DuckCodingWinner: Claude Opus 4.7
Claude

Claude Opus 4.7

claude-opus-4-7

Audit score

87

View report
848480100
OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2

No audit yet

星辰·AIWinner: Claude Opus 4.7
Claude

Claude Opus 4.7

claude-opus-4-7

Audit score

78

View report
72728088
OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2

No audit yet

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.7
OpenAIGPT-5.2
Aitoke15 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.7

speed / latency

35 tok/s / 2753ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

ApiToken Online15 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.7

speed / latency

38 tok/s / 3322ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

N1N15 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.7

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

56 tok/s / 1798ms

input / output

No data

PackyAPI15 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.7

speed / latency

46 tok/s / 2207ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

94 tok/s / 11492ms

input / output

No data

Fengsili API10 tests
Claude

Claude Opus 4.7

speed / latency

52 tok/s / 3590ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

XShuLab Sub2API
Claude

Claude Opus 4.7

claude-opus-4-7-xhigh

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0014/M / $0.0068/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2-openai-compact

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0005/M / $0.0038/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
ClaudeClaude Opus 4.7
OpenAIGPT-5.2
When to choose each model

Claude Opus 4.7

Claude Opus 4.7 is stronger when you prioritize Free providers.

GPT-5.2

GPT-5.2 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Provider coverage, Recent tests.

FAQ

TL;DR: GPT-5.2 leads across 95 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from Claude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.2 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

ClaudeClaude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs Claude Opus 4.76 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.7 vs GPT-56 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro6 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 04:34 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.