Data points: 126
Model compare
The readout for Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.2, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: Claude Opus 4.7. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 57.3 to 42.7.
Evidence depth
126 data points
Includes 26 benchmark rows, 2 audit samples, and 8 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Claude Opus 4.7
The charts below split 36 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 57.3 pts | 42.7 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 4 categories | 2 categories |
| Operational advantages | Cheapest input price | Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage |
| Context window | 1M tokens | 400K tokens |
| Max output | 128K tokens | 128K tokens |
| Modalities | Input TextImageFile Output Text |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Released | May 2026 | Dec 2025 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Claude | GPT |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | anthropic/claude-opus-4.7 | openai/gpt-5.2 |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Claude Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
Claude Opus 4.7
Claude Opus 4.7 is stronger in benchmark categories (Agents, Coding, Reasoning, Math) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price).
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 is stronger in benchmark categories (Knowledge, Instruction following) and operational dimensions (Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage).
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
Claude Opus 4.7
54.5
Avg. score
GPT-5.2
52.8
Claude Opus 4.7 leads by 6.8
Claude Opus 4.7 leads by 3.9
Claude Opus 4.7 leads by 1.9
GPT-5.2 leads by 3.1
Claude Opus 4.7 leads by 0.9
No data
GPT-5.2
GPT-5.2 leads by 10.4
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
Claude Opus 4.7
winner66.0
Rank #20/84 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
53.0
Rank #50/84 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7
$5.00/M
Rank #146/162 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner$1.75/M
Rank #120/162 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.7
$10.00/M
Rank #147/162 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner$4.81/M
Rank #132/162 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.7
$25.00/M
Rank #147/162 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
winner$14.00/M
Rank #133/162 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.7
67.0
Rank #34/89 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
winner72.7
Rank #13/89 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7
winner91.4%
Rank #13/188 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
71.2%
Rank #110/188 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.7
winner39.6%
Rank #14/187 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
7.3%
Rank #109/187 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.7
5.1
Rank #33/73 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
winner11.6
Rank #20/73 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7
winner71.0
Rank #1/33 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
53.5
Rank #6/33 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7
winner54.5%
Rank #7/185 · confidence 4
GPT-5.2
40.4%
Rank #64/185 · confidence 4
Claude Opus 4.7
winner63.1
Rank #11/65 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
52.2
Rank #34/65 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7
50.1
Rank #21/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
winner52.1
Rank #18/96 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7
winner22.9
Rank #9/35 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
18.8
Rank #11/35 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7
winner43.8
Rank #9/47 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
40.7
Rank #10/47 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7
winner61.9
Rank #21/56 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
58.5
Rank #24/56 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7
62.7
Rank #37/55 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
winner80.8
Rank #11/55 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7
43.5
Rank #17/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
winner43.8
Rank #16/90 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7
88.5
Rank #31/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
winner90.3
Rank #19/96 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7
winner42.7
Rank #20/99 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
42.2
Rank #22/99 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7
31.2
Rank #30/96 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
winner35.4
Rank #21/96 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7
51.9
Rank #64/90 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
winner79.7
Rank #39/90 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7
winner1325.0
Rank #4/66 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
1224.0
Rank #37/66 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7
43.6
Rank #63/86 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
winner75.4
Rank #21/86 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7
winner65.6
Rank #3/50 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
46.5
Rank #29/50 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7
winner74.0
Rank #15/53 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
22.0
Rank #48/53 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Claude Opus 4.7
74.0
Rank #60/84 · confidence 1 · eval date 2026-04-16
GPT-5.2
winner84.8
Rank #44/84 · confidence 3 · eval date 2025-12-11
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
Winner: Claude Opus 4.7 | Claude Opus 4.7 claude-opus-4-7 Audit score 87 848480100 | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2 No audit yet |
Winner: Claude Opus 4.7 | Claude Opus 4.7 claude-opus-4-7 Audit score 86 5910086100 | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2 No audit yet |
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Claude Opus 4.7 | GPT-5.2 |
|---|---|---|
15 tests | Claude Opus 4.7 speed / latency 35 tok/s / 2753ms input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
15 tests | Claude Opus 4.7 speed / latency 38 tok/s / 3322ms input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
15 tests | Claude Opus 4.7 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 56 tok/s / 1798ms input / output No data |
15 tests | Claude Opus 4.7 speed / latency 46 tok/s / 2207ms input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency 94 tok/s / 11492ms input / output No data |
10 tests | Claude Opus 4.7 speed / latency 52 tok/s / 3590ms input / output No data | GPT-5.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Claude Opus 4.7 claude-opus-4-7 speed / latency No data input / output $40.15/M/$200.75/M | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2 speed / latency No data input / output $0/M | |
Claude Opus 4.7 claude-opus-4-7 speed / latency No data input / output $0/M/$0/M | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-openai-compact speed / latency No data input / output $0/M | |
Claude Opus 4.7 claude-opus-4-7 speed / latency No data input / output $0/request | GPT-5.2 gpt-5.2-chat-latest speed / latency No data input / output $0/request |
Weighted outcome: Claude Opus 4.7. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Input
Output
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
|---|
