LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 83

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for DeepSeek R1 and DeepSeek V3.2, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

DeepSeek V3.2

DeepSeek V3.2 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 2 to 3.

Evidence depth

83 data points

Includes 8 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 8 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with DeepSeek V3.2

The charts below split 16 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

DeepSeek R1 vs DeepSeek V3.2

deepseek-r1-vs-deepseek-v3-2

Model A

DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

Model B

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

Overall leaderContenderLeading
Verified metric wins2 wins3 wins
Where it leadsAverage speed, Recent testsFirst-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage
Model metadataDeepSeek R1 exposes 163.8K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs.DeepSeek V3.2 exposes 131.1K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs.
DeveloperDeepSeekDeepSeek
Context window163.8K tokens131.1K tokens
Max output32.8K tokens64K tokens
ReleasedMay 2025Dec 2025
Modalities

Input

Text

Output

Text

Input

Text

Output

Text
Features
Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerDeepSeekDeepSeek
Knowledge cutoff2025-03-31No data
OpenRouter IDdeepseek/deepseek-r1-0528deepseek/deepseek-v3.2
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
DeepSeekDeepSeek R1
DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.2
Input price
$1.35/M#31
$0.500/M#18
MMLU-Pro
84.9%#18
83.7%#23
Output price
$4.20/M#32
$1.60/M#21
LiveCodeBench
77.0%#23
59.3%#43
Blended price
$2.06/M#52
$0.775/M#31
SciCode
40.3%#45
38.7%#54
GPQA
81.3%#51
75.1%#68
HLE
14.9%#52
10.5%#64

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
DeepSeekDeepSeek R1
DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.2
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
DeepSeekDeepSeek R1
DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.2
SiliconFlow133 tests
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

speed / latency

15 tok/s / 62393ms

input / output

No data

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

speed / latency

26 tok/s / 11490ms

input / output

No data

云智API85 tests
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

speed / latency

20 tok/s / 21397ms

input / output

No data

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

speed / latency

29 tok/s / 3036ms

input / output

No data

阿里云百炼 DashScope65 tests
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

speed / latency

25 tok/s / 38312ms

input / output

No data

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

speed / latency

27 tok/s / 1295ms

input / output

No data

火山引擎 Ark60 tests
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

speed / latency

29 tok/s / 27766ms

input / output

No data

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

speed / latency

29 tok/s / 1828ms

input / output

No data

Gitee AI55 tests
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

speed / latency

32 tok/s / 21696ms

input / output

No data

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

speed / latency

35 tok/s / 6182ms

input / output

No data

MapleLeaf API
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

deepseek-ai/deepseek-r1-0528

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

deepseek-3.2

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$75.00/M / $75.00/M

10dian-API
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

deepseek-r1

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0010/M / $0.0010/M

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V3.2

deepseek-v3.2(次模型)

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.100/M / $0.100/M

素墨API
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

deepseek-r1-0528

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.010/M

Qwen

DeepSeek V3.2

qwen3.5-omni-plus-thinking-nx

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.010/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for DeepSeek R1 and DeepSeek V3.2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
DeepSeekDeepSeek R1
DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.2
When to choose each model

DeepSeek R1

DeepSeek R1 is stronger when you prioritize Average speed, Recent tests.

DeepSeek V3.2

DeepSeek V3.2 is stronger when you prioritize First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage.

FAQ

TL;DR: DeepSeek V3.2 leads across 83 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from DeepSeek R1 vs DeepSeek V3.2 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

DeepSeekDeepSeek R1 vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek R16 verified data pointsDeepSeekDeepSeek R1 vs GPT-56 verified data pointsDeepSeekDeepSeek R1 vs GPT-5.26 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 03:01 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.