LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 82

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for DeepSeek R1 and GPT-5.2, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

GPT-5.2

GPT-5.2 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 2 to 4.

Evidence depth

82 data points

Includes 8 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 9 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with GPT-5.2

The charts below split 17 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

DeepSeek R1 vs GPT-5.2

deepseek-r1-vs-gpt-5-2

Model A

DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

Model B

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

Overall leaderContenderLeading
Verified metric wins2 wins4 wins
Where it leadsFree providers, Recent testsCheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Provider coverage
Model metadataDeepSeek R1 exposes 163.8K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs.GPT-5.2 exposes 128K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.
DeveloperDeepSeekOpenAI
Context window163.8K tokens128K tokens
Max output32.8K tokens16.4K tokens
ReleasedMay 2025Dec 2025
Modalities

Input

Text

Output

Text

Input

FileImageText

Output

Text
Features
Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerDeepSeekGPT
Knowledge cutoff2025-03-31No data
OpenRouter IDdeepseek/deepseek-r1-0528openai/gpt-5.2-chat
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
DeepSeekDeepSeek R1
OpenAIGPT-5.2
LiveCodeBench
77.0%#23
88.9%#4
MMLU-Pro
84.9%#18
87.4%#6
GPQA
81.3%#51
90.3%#9
HLE
14.9%#52
35.4%#9
SciCode
40.3%#45
52.1%#9
Input price
$1.35/M#31
$1.75/M#35
Output price
$4.20/M#32
$14.00/M#43
Blended price
$2.06/M#52
$4.81/M#62

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
DeepSeekDeepSeek R1
OpenAIGPT-5.2
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
DeepSeekDeepSeek R1
OpenAIGPT-5.2
ChatGTP30 tests
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

speed / latency

47 tok/s / 15233ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenRouter24 tests
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

speed / latency

43 tok/s / 16905ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

N1N15 tests
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

56 tok/s / 1798ms

input / output

No data

ocool AI13 tests
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

speed / latency

104 tok/s / 2242ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Gpt API10 tests
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

speed / latency

38 tok/s / 2259ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

10dian-API
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

deepseek-r1

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0010/M / $0.0010/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.010/M

CookingAI
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

deepseek-r1-0528

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.010/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.050/M / $0.050/M

紫脑喵
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

deepseek-r1-0528

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.010/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2-chat-latest

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$75.00/M / $600.00/M

CHB API
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1-0528

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.024/M / $0.096/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2-medium

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.024/M / $0.192/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for DeepSeek R1 and GPT-5.2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
DeepSeekDeepSeek R1
OpenAIGPT-5.2
When to choose each model

DeepSeek R1

DeepSeek R1 is stronger when you prioritize Free providers, Recent tests.

GPT-5.2

GPT-5.2 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency, Provider coverage.

FAQ

TL;DR: GPT-5.2 leads across 82 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from DeepSeek R1 vs GPT-5.2 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

DeepSeekDeepSeek R1 vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek R16 verified data pointsDeepSeekDeepSeek R1 vs GPT-56 verified data pointsDeepSeekDeepSeek R1 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro6 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 01:12 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.