Data points: 58
The readout for DeepSeek R1 and GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
Tie
Tie currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 3 to 3.
Evidence depth
58 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 5 provider examples.
Selection signal
Tie
The charts below split 5 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Model compare DeepSeek R1 vs GLM-4.1v Thinking Flashdeepseek-r1-vs-glm-4-1v-thinking-flash | Model A DeepSeek R1 | Model B GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Tie | Tie |
| Verified metric wins | 3 wins | 3 wins |
| Where it leads | Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 | GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash |
|---|---|---|
| No shared benchmark metrics are available yet. | ||
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | DeepSeek R1 | GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | DeepSeek R1 | GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash |
|---|---|---|
354 tests | DeepSeek R1 speed / latency 46 tok/s / 11949ms input / output No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for DeepSeek R1 and GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | DeepSeek R1 | GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | DeepSeek R1 DeepSeek R1 is stronger when you prioritize Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests. | GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency. |
TL;DR: Tie leads across 58 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from DeepSeek R1 vs GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
| Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency |
| Model metadata | DeepSeek R1 exposes 163.8K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs. | No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model. |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | DeepSeek | Zhipu AI |
| Context window | 163.8K tokens | No data |
| Max output | 32.8K tokens | No data |
| Released | May 2025 | No data |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | No data |
| Features | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | None listed |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | DeepSeek | No data |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-03-31 | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | deepseek/deepseek-r1-0528 | No data |
| References | No data | No data |
GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash
speed / latency
85 tok/s / 7460ms
input / output
No data
APDSM5 tests | DeepSeek R1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash speed / latency 70 tok/s / 9293ms input / output No data |
|---|
6345ywz API0 tests | DeepSeek R1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
DMXAPI0 tests | DeepSeek R1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
IXIOCCAPI0 tests | DeepSeek R1 deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1-0528 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $1.10/M / $4.40/M | GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash glm-4.1v-thinking-flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.0002/M / $0.0002/M |
|---|
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
