LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 79

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for DeepSeek R1 and Kimi K2.5, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

Kimi K2.5

Kimi K2.5 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 2 to 4.

Evidence depth

79 data points

Includes 6 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 8 provider examples.

Selection signal

Start with Kimi K2.5

The charts below split 14 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

DeepSeek R1 vs Kimi K2.5

deepseek-r1-vs-kimi-k2-5

Model A

DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

Model B

MoonshotAI

Kimi K2.5

Overall leaderContenderLeading
Verified metric wins2 wins4 wins
Where it leadsFirst-token latency, Recent testsCheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage
Model metadataDeepSeek R1 exposes 163.8K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs.Kimi K2.5 exposes 262.1K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, Text output, Tool calling.
DeveloperDeepSeekMoonshot AI
Context window163.8K tokens262.1K tokens
Max output32.8K tokens262.1K tokens
ReleasedMay 2025Jan 2026
Modalities

Input

Text

Output

Text

Input

TextImage

Output

Text
Features
Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
Text inputImage inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerDeepSeekOther
Knowledge cutoff2025-03-31No data
OpenRouter IDdeepseek/deepseek-r1-0528moonshotai/kimi-k2.5
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
DeepSeekDeepSeek R1
MoonshotAIKimi K2.5
HLE
14.9%#52
29.4%#14
SciCode
40.3%#45
49.0%#14
GPQA
81.3%#51
87.9%#16
Input price
$1.35/M#31
$0.580/M#21
Output price
$4.20/M#32
$3.00/M#28
Blended price
$2.06/M#52
$1.19/M#43

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
DeepSeekDeepSeek R1
MoonshotAIKimi K2.5
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
DeepSeekDeepSeek R1
MoonshotAIKimi K2.5
阿里云百炼 DashScope150 tests
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

speed / latency

25 tok/s / 38312ms

input / output

No data

MoonshotAI

Kimi K2.5

speed / latency

45 tok/s / 2058ms

input / output

No data

Tencent60 tests
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

speed / latency

13 tok/s / 54820ms

input / output

No data

MoonshotAI

Kimi K2.5

speed / latency

41 tok/s / 14388ms

input / output

No data

Gitee AI50 tests
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

speed / latency

32 tok/s / 21696ms

input / output

No data

MoonshotAI

Kimi K2.5

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

火山引擎 Ark50 tests
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

speed / latency

29 tok/s / 27766ms

input / output

No data

MoonshotAI

Kimi K2.5

speed / latency

18 tok/s / 25450ms

input / output

No data

NVIDIA NIM35 tests
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

speed / latency

88 tok/s / 8956ms

input / output

No data

MoonshotAI

Kimi K2.5

speed / latency

48 tok/s / 18528ms

input / output

No data

MapleLeaf API
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

deepseek-ai/deepseek-r1-0528

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

MoonshotAI

Kimi K2.5

moonshotai/kimi-k2.5

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.300/M / $1.90/M

素墨API
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

deepseek-r1-0528

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.010/M

MoonshotAI

Kimi K2.5

moonshotai/kimi-k2.5

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.010/M

紫脑喵
DeepSeek

DeepSeek R1

deepseek-r1

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.010/M

MoonshotAI

Kimi K2.5

kimi-k2.5

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.010/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for DeepSeek R1 and Kimi K2.5: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
DeepSeekDeepSeek R1
MoonshotAIKimi K2.5
When to choose each model

DeepSeek R1

DeepSeek R1 is stronger when you prioritize First-token latency, Recent tests.

Kimi K2.5

Kimi K2.5 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers, Provider coverage.

FAQ

TL;DR: Kimi K2.5 leads across 79 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from DeepSeek R1 vs Kimi K2.5 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

DeepSeekDeepSeek R1 vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek R16 verified data pointsDeepSeekDeepSeek R1 vs GPT-56 verified data pointsDeepSeekDeepSeek R1 vs GPT-5.26 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 03:01 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.