Data points: 57
The readout for DeepSeek V3.2 and GLM-4V Flash, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 4 to 2.
Evidence depth
57 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 5 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with DeepSeek V3.2
The charts below split 5 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Model compare DeepSeek V3.2 vs GLM-4V Flashdeepseek-v3-2-vs-glm-4v-flash | Model A DeepSeek V3.2 | Model B GLM-4V Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Verified metric wins | 4 wins | 2 wins |
| Where it leads | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3.2 | GLM-4V Flash |
|---|---|---|
| No shared benchmark metrics are available yet. | ||
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | DeepSeek V3.2 | GLM-4V Flash |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | DeepSeek V3.2 | GLM-4V Flash |
|---|---|---|
35 tests | DeepSeek V3.2 speed / latency 227 tok/s / 1884ms input / output No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for DeepSeek V3.2 and GLM-4V Flash: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | DeepSeek V3.2 | GLM-4V Flash |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek V3.2 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests. | GLM-4V Flash GLM-4V Flash is stronger when you prioritize Average speed, First-token latency. |
TL;DR: DeepSeek V3.2 leads across 57 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from DeepSeek V3.2 vs GLM-4V Flash into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
| Average speed, First-token latency |
| Model metadata | DeepSeek V3.2 exposes 131.1K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Text output, Tool calling, Structured outputs. | No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model. |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | DeepSeek | Zhipu AI |
| Context window | 131.1K tokens | No data |
| Max output | 64K tokens | No data |
| Released | Dec 2025 | No data |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | No data |
| Features | Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | None listed |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | DeepSeek | No data |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | deepseek/deepseek-v3.2 | No data |
| References | No data | No data |
GLM-4V Flash
speed / latency
N/A / N/A
input / output
No data
素墨API10 tests | DeepSeek V3.2 qwen3.5-omni-plus-thinking-nx speed / latency 22 tok/s / 5987ms input / output $0.010/M / $0.010/M | GLM-4V Flash glm-4v-flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.010/M / $0.010/M |
|---|
APDSM5 tests | DeepSeek V3.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GLM-4V Flash speed / latency 58 tok/s / 1205ms input / output No data |
|---|
Aitoke0 tests | DeepSeek V3.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GLM-4V Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
|---|
EasyMore0 tests | DeepSeek V3.2 deepseek-v3.2-speciale speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.274/M / $0.411/M | GLM-4V Flash glm-4v-flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.014/M / $0.014/M |
|---|
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
