Data points: 54
Model compare
The readout for DeepSeek V3.2 and Solar Instruct, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: DeepSeek V3.2. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2 has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 100 to 0.
Evidence depth
54 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 5 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with DeepSeek V3.2
The charts below split 5 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for DeepSeek V3.2 and Solar Instruct: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | DeepSeek V3.2 | Solar Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 100.0 pts | 0.0 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 0 categories | 0 categories |
| Operational advantages | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage | No data |
| Context window | 163.8K tokens | No data |
| Max output | 65.5K tokens | No data |
| Modalities | Input Text Output Text | No data |
| Features |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | DeepSeek V3.2 | Solar Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | DeepSeek | No data |
| Released | Dec 2025 | No data |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | DeepSeek | No data |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | deepseek/deepseek-v3.2 | No data |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for DeepSeek V3.2 and Solar Instruct: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2 has these operational advantages: Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage.
Solar Instruct
Solar Instruct does not clearly lead in the benchmark or operational dimensions shared by both models.
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
DeepSeek V3.2
46.4
Avg. score
Solar Instruct
-
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2
DeepSeek V3.2
No data
No data
DeepSeek V3.2
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
No shared professional benchmark scores are available yet.
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | DeepSeek V3.2 | Solar Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | DeepSeek V3.2 | Solar Instruct |
|---|---|---|
10 tests | DeepSeek V3.2 deepseek-v3.2-speciale speed / latency 22 tok/s / 5987ms input / output $0.010/request | Solar Instruct upstage/solar-10.7b-instruct speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.010/request |
0 tests | DeepSeek V3.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Solar Instruct speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | DeepSeek V3.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Solar Instruct speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | DeepSeek V3.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Solar Instruct speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | DeepSeek V3.2 deepseek-ai/deepseek-v3.2 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $75.00/M/$75.00/M | Solar Instruct upstage/solar-10.7b-instruct speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $75.00/M |
Weighted outcome: DeepSeek V3.2. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Text inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
| None listed |
