Data points: 67
The readout for DeepSeek V3 and GPT-5.4, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
Tie
Tie currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 3 to 3.
Evidence depth
67 data points
Includes 6 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 8 provider examples.
Selection signal
Tie
The charts below split 14 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Model compare DeepSeek V3 vs GPT-5.4deepseek-v3-vs-gpt-5-4 | Model A DeepSeek V3 | Model B GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Tie | Tie |
| Verified metric wins | 3 wins | 3 wins |
| Where it leads | Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency | Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests |
| Model metadata | No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model. | GPT-5.4 exposes 1.1M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output. |
| Developer | No data | OpenAI |
| Context window | No data | 1.1M tokens |
| Max output | No data | 128K tokens |
| Released | No data | Mar 2026 |
| Modalities | No data | Input TextImageFile Output Text |
| Features | None listed | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | No data | GPT |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | No data |
| OpenRouter ID | No data | openai/gpt-5.4 |
| References | No data | No data |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA | 55.7%#113 | 92.0%#3 |
| SciCode | 35.4%#75 | 56.6%#3 |
| HLE | 3.6%#99 | 41.6%#4 |
| Output price | $0.890/M#14 | $15.00/M#44 |
| Input price | $0.400/M#16 | $2.50/M#37 |
| Blended price | $0.523/M#24 | $5.63/M#63 |
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | DeepSeek V3 | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | DeepSeek V3 | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
天宫造物50 tests | DeepSeek V3 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.4 speed / latency 50 tok/s / 7305ms input / output No data |
AIHubMix30 tests | DeepSeek V3 speed / latency 95 tok/s / 519ms input / output No data | GPT-5.4 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
星见雅 API20 tests | DeepSeek V3 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.4 speed / latency 49 tok/s / 5435ms input / output No data |
6345ywz API15 tests | DeepSeek V3 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.4 speed / latency 41 tok/s / 6581ms input / output No data |
Fengsili API10 tests | DeepSeek V3 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5.4 speed / latency 88 tok/s / 6075ms input / output No data |
DeepSeek V3 deepseek-chat-search speed / latency No data input / output $0.0041/M / $0.027/M | GPT-5.4 gpt-5.4-medium speed / latency No data input / output $0.014/M / $0.085/M | |
DeepSeek V3 deepseek-v3-0324 speed / latency No data input / output $0.010/M / $0.010/M | GPT-5.4 gpt-5.4-openai-compact speed / latency No data input / output $75.00/M / $450.00/M | |
DeepSeek V3 deepseek-v3 speed / latency No data input / output $0.014/M / $0.055/M | GPT-5.4 gpt-5.4-xhigh speed / latency No data input / output $0.034/M / $0.205/M |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for DeepSeek V3 and GPT-5.4: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | DeepSeek V3 | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | DeepSeek V3 DeepSeek V3 is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, First-token latency. | GPT-5.4 GPT-5.4 is stronger when you prioritize Free providers, Provider coverage, Recent tests. |
TL;DR: Tie leads across 67 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from DeepSeek V3 vs GPT-5.4 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
