LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 64

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for DeepSeek V4 Pro and Gemini 2.5 Pro, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

Tie

Tie currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 3 to 3.

Evidence depth

64 data points

Includes 8 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 9 provider examples.

Selection signal

Tie

The charts below split 17 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

deepseek-v4-pro-vs-gemini-2-5-pro

Model A

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Pro

Model B

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Overall leaderTieTie
Verified metric wins3 wins3 wins
Where it leadsFirst-token latency, Free providers, Recent testsCheapest input price, Average speed, Provider coverage
Model metadataNo OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model.No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model.
DeveloperDeepSeekGoogle
Context windowNo dataNo data
Max outputNo dataNo data
ReleasedNo dataNo data
ModalitiesNo dataNo data
FeaturesNone listedNone listed
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerNo dataNo data
Knowledge cutoffNo dataNo data
OpenRouter IDNo dataNo data
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Pro
GeminiGemini 2.5 Pro
HLE
35.9%#8
21.1%#37
SciCode
50.0%#12
42.8%#32
GPQA
88.8%#13
84.4%#36
Output price
$0.870/M#13
$10.00/M#40
Input price
$0.435/M#17
$1.25/M#29
Blended price
$0.544/M#26
$3.44/M#57
Output speed
53.2 tok/s#83
128.7 tok/s#38
Time to first token
1.06 s#40
22.02 s#96

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Pro
GeminiGemini 2.5 Pro
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Pro
GeminiGemini 2.5 Pro
CatClaw API35 tests
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Pro

speed / latency

38 tok/s / 6365ms

input / output

No data

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

speed / latency

48 tok/s / 23637ms

input / output

No data

6345ywz API10 tests
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Pro

speed / latency

27 tok/s / 51460ms

input / output

No data

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

ZenMux10 tests
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Pro

speed / latency

41 tok/s / 5113ms

input / output

No data

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

DeepRouter5 tests
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Pro

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

speed / latency

92 tok/s / 16347ms

input / output

No data

Koyeb AI Gateway5 tests
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Pro

speed / latency

33 tok/s / 5043ms

input / output

No data

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

91VIP API
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Pro

deepseek-ai/deepseek-v4-pro

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

gemini-2.5-pro

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$1.25/M / $10.00/M

Dibin84 API Hub
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Pro

deepseek-ai/deepseek-v4-pro

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

gemini-2.5-pro

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$2.50/M / $20.00/M

小水管 API
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Pro

deepseek-v4-pro

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

gemini-2.5-pro

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0/M / $0/M

素墨API
DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4 Pro

deepseek-v4-pro

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.010/M / $0.010/M

Gemini

Gemini 2.5 Pro

gemini-2.5-pro

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.100/M / $0.100/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for DeepSeek V4 Pro and Gemini 2.5 Pro: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Pro
GeminiGemini 2.5 Pro
When to choose each model

DeepSeek V4 Pro

DeepSeek V4 Pro is stronger when you prioritize First-token latency, Free providers, Recent tests.

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, Provider coverage.

FAQ

TL;DR: Tie leads across 64 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini 2.5 Pro into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Pro vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro6 verified data pointsDeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Pro vs GPT-56 verified data pointsDeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Pro vs GPT-5.26 verified data points

Data as of Jun 11, 2026, 10:48 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.