Data points: 85
Model compare
The readout for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.1, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Weighted outcome: Gemini 2.5 Flash. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Decision read
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash has the higher weighted result; Model A / B score 73.3 to 26.7.
Evidence depth
85 data points
Includes 11 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 5 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with Gemini 2.5 Flash
The charts below split 16 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Switch either side of this report to compare another model with the same LMSpeed data pipeline.
Select a different model to open a new comparison URL.
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.1: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Model compare | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Leading | Contender |
| Weighted overall score | 73.3 pts | 26.7 pts |
| Benchmark category leads | 2 categories | 1 categories |
| Operational advantages | Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage | No data |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 131.1K tokens |
| Max output | 65.5K tokens | No data |
| Modalities | Input FileImageTextAudiovideo Output |
The overall result weights benchmark capability categories at 80% and price, API speed/latency, and availability at 20%. Recent test volume does not affect the winner, and missing benchmark categories are excluded.
| Model compare | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Developer | Mistral | |
| Released | Jun 2025 | Aug 2025 |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | Gemini | Mistral |
| Knowledge cutoff | 2025-01-31 | 2025-06-30 |
| OpenRouter ID | google/gemini-2.5-flash | mistralai/mistral-medium-3.1 |
| References | No data | No data |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for Gemini 2.5 Flash and Mistral Medium 3.1: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash is stronger in benchmark categories (Reasoning, Math) and operational dimensions (Cheapest input price, Free providers, Provider coverage).
Mistral Medium 3.1
Mistral Medium 3.1 leads these benchmark categories: Coding.
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
Compare benchmark category scores on a 0-100 scale. Select a category to inspect the gap.
Avg. score
Gemini 2.5 Flash
45.1
Avg. score
Mistral Medium 3.1
44.5
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Mistral Medium 3.1 leads by 1.4
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads by 6.5
Metric-level scores with benchmark source, rank depth, confidence, error, and evaluation date where available.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
8.45 s
Rank #73/139 · confidence 4
Mistral Medium 3.1
winner0.52 s
Rank #9/139 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Flash
8.45 s
Rank #115/139 · confidence 4
Mistral Medium 3.1
winner0.52 s
Rank #13/139 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Flash
winner218.0 tok/s
Rank #14/139 · confidence 4
Mistral Medium 3.1
81.5 tok/s
Rank #76/139 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Flash
winner$0.300/M
Rank #46/163 · confidence 4
Mistral Medium 3.1
$0.400/M
Rank #61/163 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Flash
$2.50/M
Rank #76/163 · confidence 4
Mistral Medium 3.1
winner$2.00/M
Rank #61/163 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Flash
$0.850/M
Rank #68/163 · confidence 4
Mistral Medium 3.1
winner$0.800/M
Rank #64/163 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Flash
winner83.2%
Rank #40/125 · confidence 4
Mistral Medium 3.1
68.3%
Rank #107/125 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Flash
winner79.0%
Rank #75/187 · confidence 4
Mistral Medium 3.1
58.8%
Rank #145/187 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Flash
winner11.1%
Rank #88/186 · confidence 4
Mistral Medium 3.1
4.4%
Rank #146/186 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Flash
winner69.5%
Rank #30/115 · confidence 4
Mistral Medium 3.1
40.6%
Rank #71/115 · confidence 4
Gemini 2.5 Flash
winner39.4%
Rank #79/184 · confidence 4
Mistral Medium 3.1
33.8%
Rank #117/184 · confidence 4
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | Gemini 2.5 Flash | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|
10 tests | Gemini 2.5 Flash speed / latency 141 tok/s / 2052ms input / output No data | Mistral Medium 3.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Gemini 2.5 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Mistral Medium 3.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Gemini 2.5 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Mistral Medium 3.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
0 tests | Gemini 2.5 Flash gemini-2.5-flash-preview-05-20 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.300/M/$1.20/M | Mistral Medium 3.1 mistralai/mistral-medium-3.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $75.00/M |
0 tests | Gemini 2.5 Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | Mistral Medium 3.1 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Weighted outcome: Gemini 2.5 Flash. Benchmark capability categories carry 80%, while price, API performance, and availability carry 20%.
Input TextImageFile Output Text |
| Features | Text inputImage inputFile inputAudio inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode |
|---|
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads by 7.2
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
