LogoLMSpeed
  • Home
  • Free
  • Models
  • Providers
  • Docs
LogoLMSpeed
LogoLMSpeed

The best API speed test tool

GitHubGitHubTwitterX (Twitter)Email
Product
  • Features
  • Pricing
  • FAQ
Leaderboard
  • Overview
  • Speed Ranking
  • Latency Ranking
  • Health Ranking
  • Model Pricing
  • Model Speed
  • Reasoning
  • Coding
Models
  • All Models
  • GPT
  • Claude
  • Gemini
  • DeepSeek
  • Llama
  • Qwen
Free Models
  • All Free Models
  • Free GPT
  • Free Claude
  • Free Gemini
  • Free DeepSeek
  • Free Llama
  • Free Qwen
Resources
  • Speed Test
  • Provider Directory
  • Documentation
Legal
  • Cookie Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
© 2026 LMSpeed All Rights Reserved.Made by Nexmoe with ❤️
Back to models

Data points: 80

On this page

Key TakeawaysComparison sheetBenchmark score comparisonAPI audit comparisonProvider examplesWhen to choose each modelFAQRelated compare reports

Key Takeaways

The readout for Gemini 3.1 Pro and GPT-5.2, before the detailed comparison sheet.

Decision read

Tie

Tie currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 3 to 3.

Evidence depth

80 data points

Includes 8 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 8 provider examples.

Selection signal

Tie

The charts below split 16 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.

Model compare

Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.2

gemini-3-1-pro-vs-gpt-5-2

Model A

Gemini

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Model B

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

Overall leaderTieTie
Verified metric wins3 wins3 wins
Where it leadsCheapest input price, Average speed, Free providersFirst-token latency, Provider coverage, Recent tests
Model metadataGemini 3.1 Pro exposes 1.0M tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Audio input.GPT-5.2 exposes 128K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output.
DeveloperGoogleOpenAI
Context window1.0M tokens128K tokens
Max output65.5K tokens16.4K tokens
ReleasedFeb 2026Dec 2025
Modalities

Input

AudioFileImageTextvideo

Output

Text

Input

FileImageText

Output

Text
Features
Text inputImage inputFile inputAudio inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON modeReasoning
Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputTool callingStructured outputsJSON mode
ParametersNo dataNo data
TokenizerGeminiGPT
Knowledge cutoffNo dataNo data
OpenRouter IDgoogle/gemini-3.1-pro-previewopenai/gpt-5.2-chat
ReferencesNo dataNo data

Benchmark score comparison

Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.

Metric
GeminiGemini 3.1 Pro
OpenAIGPT-5.2
GPQA
94.1%#1
90.3%#9
SciCode
58.9%#2
52.1%#9
HLE
44.7%#3
35.4%#9
Input price
$2.00/M#36
$1.75/M#35
Output speed
133.4 tok/s#35
72.8 tok/s#71
Output price
$12.00/M#42
$14.00/M#43
Blended price
$4.50/M#61
$4.81/M#62
Time to first answer token
28.68 s#84
115.69 s#109

API audit comparison

Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.

Provider
GeminiGemini 3.1 Pro
OpenAIGPT-5.2
No completed audits are available from shared providers yet.

Provider examples

Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.

Provider
GeminiGemini 3.1 Pro
OpenAIGPT-5.2
N1N15 tests
Gemini

Gemini 3.1 Pro

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

56 tok/s / 1798ms

input / output

No data

星见雅 API15 tests
Gemini

Gemini 3.1 Pro

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

52 tok/s / 2671ms

input / output

No data

CatClaw API10 tests
Gemini

Gemini 3.1 Pro

speed / latency

121 tok/s / 11404ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

PackyAPI10 tests
Gemini

Gemini 3.1 Pro

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

94 tok/s / 11492ms

input / output

No data

TradingBase API10 tests
Gemini

Gemini 3.1 Pro

speed / latency

102 tok/s / 12933ms

input / output

No data

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

speed / latency

N/A / N/A

input / output

No data

钠 API
Gemini

Gemini 3.1 Pro

gemini-3.1-pro-preview

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.0041/M / $0.0041/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2(xhigh)

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.041/M / $0.329/M

KFCV50
Gemini

Gemini 3.1 Pro

gemini-3.1-pro-preview

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.014/M / $0.014/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2-openai-compact

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$10.27/M / $10.27/M

RinkoAI
Gemini

Gemini 3.1 Pro

gemini-3.1-pro-preview-c

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.018/M / $0.018/M

OpenAI

GPT-5.2

gpt-5.2

speed / latency

No data

input / output

$0.300/M / $2.40/M

When to choose each model

This report only uses LMSpeed data for Gemini 3.1 Pro and GPT-5.2: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.

Guidance
GeminiGemini 3.1 Pro
OpenAIGPT-5.2
When to choose each model

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Gemini 3.1 Pro is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Average speed, Free providers.

GPT-5.2

GPT-5.2 is stronger when you prioritize First-token latency, Provider coverage, Recent tests.

FAQ

TL;DR: Tie leads across 80 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.

Why is this comparison indexable?
It has 6 verifiable comparison points, and both models have pricing or benchmark data.
Are missing metrics invented?
No. Metrics without LMSpeed data are omitted from this report.

Related compare reports

Continue from Gemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.2 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.

GeminiGemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-5.46 verified data pointsClaudeClaude Opus 4.6 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro6 verified data pointsGeminiGemini 3.1 Pro vs GPT-56 verified data pointsGeminiGemini 2.5 Pro vs Gemini 3.1 Pro6 verified data points

Data as of Jun 13, 2026, 02:50 PM·Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.