Data points: 57
The readout for GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash and GPT-5, before the detailed comparison sheet.
Decision read
GPT-5
GPT-5 currently has the stronger profile, with verified wins split 2 to 4.
Evidence depth
57 data points
Includes 0 benchmark rows, 0 audit samples, and 7 provider examples.
Selection signal
Start with GPT-5
The charts below split 7 high-signal samples across speed, scores, and audit health.
Model compare GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash vs GPT-5glm-4-1v-thinking-flash-vs-gpt-5 | Model A GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash | Model B GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall leader | Contender | Leading |
| Verified metric wins | 2 wins | 4 wins |
| Where it leads | Cheapest input price, Recent tests | Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage |
| Model metadata | No OpenRouter metadata is available yet for this model. | GPT-5 exposes 128K tokens; notable signals: Text input, Image input, File input, Text output. |
| Developer | Zhipu AI | OpenAI |
| Context window | No data | 128K tokens |
| Max output | No data | 16.4K tokens |
| Released | No data | Aug 2025 |
| Modalities | No data | Input FileImageText Output Text |
| Features | None listed | Text inputImage inputFile inputText outputStructured outputsJSON mode |
| Parameters | No data | No data |
| Tokenizer | No data | GPT |
| Knowledge cutoff | No data | 2024-09-30 |
| OpenRouter ID | No data | openai/gpt-5-chat |
| References | No data | No data |
Third-party benchmark profile synced into LMSpeed; only metrics available for both models are shown.
| Metric | GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| No shared benchmark metrics are available yet. | ||
Latest completed audits from shared providers, with four safety and integrity score groups plus report links.
| Provider | GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| No completed audits are available from shared providers yet. | ||
Speed aggregates and input/output pricing share each provider row for real API selection and migration cost checks.
| Provider | GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
6345ywz API0 tests | GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash zhipu/glm-4.1v-thinking-flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.137/M / $0.137/M | GPT-5 gpt-5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.171/M / $1.37/M |
DMXAPI0 tests | GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
IXIOCCAPI0 tests | GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash glm-4.1v-thinking-flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.0002/M / $0.0002/M | GPT-5 openai/gpt-5-chat speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $75.00/M / $75.00/M |
KFCV500 tests | GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data | GPT-5 speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output No data |
Koyeb AI Gateway0 tests | GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash glm-4.1v-thinking-flash speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.037/M / $0.037/M | GPT-5 gpt-5-chat speed / latency N/A / N/A input / output $0.037/M / $0.300/M |
GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash glm-4.1v-thinking-flash speed / latency No data input / output $0.037/M / $0.037/M | GPT-5 gpt-5-chat speed / latency No data input / output $0.037/M / $0.300/M | |
GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash glm-4.1v-thinking-flash speed / latency No data input / output $0.098/M / $0.098/M | GPT-5 gpt-5-search-api-2025-10-14 speed / latency No data input / output $0.612/M / $4.90/M |
This report only uses LMSpeed data for GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash and GPT-5: pricing, speed aggregates, third-party benchmark scores, and shared provider samples.
| Guidance | GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash | GPT-5 |
|---|---|---|
| When to choose each model | GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash is stronger when you prioritize Cheapest input price, Recent tests. | GPT-5 GPT-5 is stronger when you prioritize Average speed, First-token latency, Free providers, Provider coverage. |
TL;DR: GPT-5 leads across 57 verifiable data points, including pricing, speed, latency, benchmarks, and provider examples.
Continue from GLM-4.1v Thinking Flash vs GPT-5 into nearby model comparisons with enough verified LMSpeed data.
Rankings are based on community-submitted tests and periodic health probes. Advisory only, not official data.
